Connecticut 2019 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07393 Introduced / Bill

Filed 03/20/2019

                       
 
LCO No. 6440  	1 of 13 
  
General Assembly  Raised Bill No. 7393  
January Session, 2019  
LCO No. 6440 
 
 
Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY  
 
 
Introduced by:  
(JUD)  
 
 
 
 
AN ACT CONCERNING CO URT PROCEEDINGS IN FAMIL Y 
RELATIONS MATTERS. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General 
Assembly convened: 
 
Section 1. Section 46b-87 of the general statutes is repealed and the 1 
following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2019): 2 
(a) When any person is found in contempt of an order of the 3 
Superior Court entered under [section 46b-60 to 46b-62, inclusive, 46b-4 
81 to 46b-83, inclusive, or 46b-86] the provisions of this chapter, the 5 
court may award to the petitioner a reasonable attorney's fee and the 6 
fees of the officer serving the contempt citation, such sums to be paid 7 
by the person found in contempt, provided if any such person is found 8 
not to be in contempt of such order, the court may award a reasonable 9 
attorney's fee to such person. The costs of commitment of any person 10 
imprisoned for contempt of court by reason of failure to comply with 11 
such an order shall be paid by the state as in criminal cases. 12 
(b) In addition to the award of fees pursuant to subsection (a) of this 13 
section, when any person is found in contempt of a court order 14  Raised Bill No.  7393 
 
 
 
LCO No. 6440   	2 of 13 
 
concerning an assignment of custody, visitation with a minor child or 15 
parental access, the court may impose additional sanctions against the 16 
person found to be in contempt of the court order that include, but are 17 
not limited to, (1) fines, (2) a reduction or suspension of visitation or 18 
parental access, and (3) a change in the assignment of physical and 19 
legal custody. 20 
Sec. 2. Section 46b-56 of the general statutes is repealed and the 21 
following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2019): 22 
(a) In any controversy before the Superior Court as to the custody or 23 
care of minor children, and at any time after the return day of any 24 
complaint under section 46b-45, the court may make or modify any 25 
proper order regarding the custody, care, education, visitation and 26 
support of the children if it has jurisdiction under the provisions of 27 
chapter 815p. Subject to the provisions of section 46b-56a, the court 28 
may assign parental responsibility for raising the child to the parents 29 
jointly, or may award custody to either parent or to a third party, 30 
according to its best judgment upon the facts of the case and subject to 31 
such conditions and limitations as it deems equitable. The court may 32 
also make any order granting the right of visitation of any child to a 33 
third party to the action, including, but not limited to, grandparents. 34 
Notwithstanding the provisions of this subsection, the court shall not 35 
make or modify any order as to the custody of a child involving an 36 
allegation of abuse, unless and until there is an evidentiary offer of 37 
proof and hearing concerning such allegation of abuse. 38 
(b) In making or modifying any order as provided in subsection (a) 39 
of this section, the rights and responsibilities of both parents shall be 40 
considered and the court shall enter orders accordingly that serve the 41 
best interests of the child and provide the child with the active and 42 
consistent involvement of both parents commensurate with their 43 
abilities and interests. Such orders may include, but shall not be 44 
limited to: (1) Approval of a parental responsibility plan agreed to by 45 
the parents pursuant to section 46b-56a; (2) the award of joint parental 46 
responsibility of a minor child to both parents, which shall include (A) 47  Raised Bill No.  7393 
 
 
 
LCO No. 6440   	3 of 13 
 
provisions for residential arrangements with each parent in accordance 48 
with the needs of the child and the parents, and (B) provisions for 49 
consultation between the parents and for the making of major 50 
decisions regarding the child's health, education and religious 51 
upbringing; (3) the award of sole custody to one parent with 52 
appropriate parenting time for the noncustodial parent where sole 53 
custody is in the best interests of the child; or (4) any other custody 54 
arrangements as the court may determine to be in the best interests of 55 
the child. In making or modifying any order concerning visitation with 56 
a child pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, absent agreement of 57 
the parties, the court shall not order that a parent's visitation with a 58 
child be supervised unless the court enters a finding on the record of 59 
the circumstances necessitating that such visitation be supervised. 60 
(c) In making or modifying any order as provided in subsections (a) 61 
and (b) of this section, the court shall consider the best interests of the 62 
child, and in doing so may consider, but shall not be limited to, one or 63 
more of the following factors: (1) The temperament and developmental 64 
needs of the child; (2) the capacity and the disposition of the parents to 65 
understand and meet the needs of the child; (3) any relevant and 66 
material information obtained from the child, including the informed 67 
preferences of the child; (4) the wishes of the child's parents as to 68 
custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship of the 69 
child with each parent, the child's siblings and any other person who 70 
may significantly affect the best interests of the child; [(6) the 71 
willingness and ability of each parent to facilitate and encourage such 72 
continuing parent-child relationship between the child and the other 73 
parent as is appropriate, including compliance with any court orders; 74 
(7)] (6) any manipulation by or coercive behavior of the parents in an 75 
effort to involve the child in the parents' dispute; [(8)] (7) the ability of 76 
each parent to be actively involved in the life of the child; [(9)] (8) the 77 
child's adjustment to his or her home, school and community 78 
environments; [(10)] (9) the length of time that the child has lived in a 79 
stable and satisfactory environment and the desirability of maintaining 80 
continuity in such environment, provided the court may consider 81  Raised Bill No.  7393 
 
 
 
LCO No. 6440   	4 of 13 
 
favorably a parent who voluntarily leaves the child's family home 82 
pendente lite in order to alleviate stress in the household; [(11)] (10) the 83 
stability of the child's existing or proposed residences, or both; [(12)] 84 
(11) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except 85 
that a disability of a proposed custodial parent or other party, in and of 86 
itself, shall not be determinative of custody unless the proposed 87 
custodial arrangement is not in the best interests of the child; [(13)] (12) 88 
the child's cultural background; [(14)] (13) the effect on the child of the 89 
actions of an abuser, if any domestic violence has occurred between 90 
the parents or between a parent and another individual or the child; 91 
[(15)] (14) whether the child or a sibling of the child has been abused or 92 
neglected, as defined respectively in section 46b-120; and [(16)] (15) 93 
whether the party satisfactorily completed participation in a parenting 94 
education program established pursuant to section 46b-69b. The court 95 
is not required to assign any weight to any of the factors that it 96 
considers, but shall articulate the basis for its decision. 97 
(d) There shall be a rebuttable presumption that a parent is not 98 
acting in the best interests of a child when such parent's conduct 99 
evidences an unwillingness or inability to (1) facilitate and encourage 100 
the other parent's relationship with the child, as is appropriate under 101 
the circumstances, or (2) comply with court orders that seek to 102 
facilitate and encourage such relationship. 103 
 [(d)] (e) Upon the issuance of any order assigning custody of the 104 
child to the Commissioner of Children and Families, or not later than 105 
sixty days after the issuance of such order, the court shall make a 106 
determination whether the Department of Children and Families made 107 
reasonable efforts to keep the child with his or her parents prior to the 108 
issuance of such order and, if such efforts were not made, whether 109 
such reasonable efforts were not possible, taking into consideration the 110 
best interests of the child, including the child's health and safety. 111 
[(e)] (f) In determining whether a child is in need of support and, if 112 
in need, the respective abilities of the parents to provide support, the 113 
court shall take into consideration all the factors enumerated in section 114  Raised Bill No.  7393 
 
 
 
LCO No. 6440   	5 of 13 
 
46b-84. 115 
[(f)] (g) When the court is not sitting, any judge of the court may 116 
make any order in the cause which the court might make under this 117 
section, including orders of injunction, prior to any action in the cause 118 
by the court. 119 
[(g)] (h) A parent not granted custody of a minor child shall not be 120 
denied the right of access to the academic, medical, hospital or other 121 
health records of such minor child, unless otherwise ordered by the 122 
court for good cause shown. 123 
[(h)] (i) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (b) and (c) of 124 
this section, when a motion for modification of custody or visitation is 125 
pending before the court or has been decided by the court and the 126 
investigation ordered by the court pursuant to section 46b-6, as 127 
amended by this act, recommends psychiatric or psychological therapy 128 
for a child, and such therapy would, in the court's opinion, be in the 129 
best interests of the child and aid the child's response to a 130 
modification, the court may order such therapy and reserve judgment 131 
on the motion for modification. 132 
[(i)] (j) As part of a decision concerning custody or visitation, the 133 
court may order either parent or both of the parents and any child of 134 
such parents to participate in counseling and drug or alcohol 135 
screening, provided such participation is in the best interests of the 136 
child. 137 
Sec. 3. Section 46b-54 of the general statutes is repealed and the 138 
following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2019): 139 
(a) The court may appoint counsel or a guardian ad litem for any 140 
minor child or children of either or both parties at any time after the 141 
return day of a complaint under section 46b-45, if the court deems it to 142 
be in the best interests of the child or children. The court may appoint 143 
counsel or a guardian ad litem on its own motion, or at the request of 144 
either of the parties or of the legal guardian of any child or at the 145  Raised Bill No.  7393 
 
 
 
LCO No. 6440   	6 of 13 
 
request of any child who is of sufficient age and capable of making an 146 
intelligent request. 147 
(b) Counsel or a guardian ad litem for the minor child or children 148 
may also be appointed on the motion of the court or on the request of 149 
any person enumerated in subsection (a) of this section in any case 150 
before the court when the court finds that the custody, care, education, 151 
visitation or support of a minor child is in actual controversy, provided 152 
the court may make any order regarding a matter in controversy prior 153 
to the appointment of counsel or a guardian ad litem where it finds 154 
immediate action necessary in the best interests of any child. 155 
(c) In the absence of an agreement of the parties to the appointment 156 
of counsel or a guardian ad litem for a minor child in the parties' 157 
matter and a canvassing by the court concerning the terms of such 158 
agreement, the court shall only appoint such counsel or guardian ad 159 
litem under this section when, in the court's discretion, reasonable 160 
options and efforts to resolve a dispute of the parties concerning the 161 
custody, care, education, visitation or support of a minor child have 162 
been made. 163 
(d) If the court deems the appointment of counsel or a guardian ad 164 
litem for any minor child or children to be in the best interests of the 165 
child or children, such appointment shall be made in accordance with 166 
the provisions of section 46b-12. 167 
(e) Counsel or a guardian ad litem for the minor child or children 168 
shall be heard on all matters pertaining to the interests of any child, 169 
including the custody, care, support, education and visitation of the 170 
child, so long as the court deems such representation to be in the best 171 
interests of the child. To the extent practicable, when hearing from 172 
such counsel or guardian ad litem, the court shall permit such counsel 173 
or guardian ad litem to participate at the beginning of the matter, at 174 
the conclusion of the matter or at such other time the court deems 175 
appropriate so as to minimize legal fees incurred by the parties due to 176 
the participation of such counsel or guardian ad litem in the matter. 177  Raised Bill No.  7393 
 
 
 
LCO No. 6440   	7 of 13 
 
Such counsel or guardian ad litem may be heard on a matter 178 
pertaining to a medical diagnosis or conclusion concerning a minor 179 
child made by a health care professional treating such child when (1) 180 
such counsel or guardian ad litem is in possession of a medical record 181 
or report of the treating health care professional that indicates or 182 
supports such medical diagnosis or conclusion; or (2) one or more 183 
parties have refused to cooperate in paying for or obtaining a medical 184 
record or report that contains the treating health care professional's 185 
medical diagnosis or conclusion. If the court deems it to be in the best 186 
interests of the minor child, such health care professional shall be 187 
heard on matters pertaining to the interests of any such child, 188 
including the custody, care, support, education and visitation of such 189 
child. 190 
(f) When recommending the entry of any order as provided in 191 
subsections (a) and (b) of section 46b-56, as amended by this act, 192 
counsel or a guardian ad litem for the minor child shall consider the 193 
best interests of the child, and in doing so shall consider, but not be 194 
limited to, one or more of the following factors: (1) The temperament 195 
and developmental needs of the child; (2) the capacity and the 196 
disposition of the parents to understand and meet the needs of the 197 
child; (3) any relevant and material information obtained from the 198 
child, including the informed preferences of the child; (4) the wishes of 199 
the child's parents as to custody; (5) the past and current interaction 200 
and relationship of the child with each parent, the child's siblings and 201 
any other person who may significantly affect the best interests of the 202 
child; [(6) the willingness and ability of each parent to facilitate and 203 
encourage such continuing parent-child relationship between the child 204 
and the other parent as is appropriate, including compliance with any 205 
court orders; (7)] (6) any manipulation by or coercive behavior of the 206 
parents in an effort to involve the child in the parents' dispute; [(8)] (7) 207 
the ability of each parent to be actively involved in the life of the child; 208 
[(9)] (8) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school and 209 
community environments; [(10)] (9) the length of time that the child 210 
has lived in a stable and satisfactory environment and the desirability 211  Raised Bill No.  7393 
 
 
 
LCO No. 6440   	8 of 13 
 
of maintaining continuity in such environment, provided counsel or a 212 
guardian ad litem for the minor child may consider favorably a parent 213 
who voluntarily leaves the child's family home pendente lite in order 214 
to alleviate stress in the household; [(11)] (10) the stability of the child's 215 
existing or proposed residences, or both; [(12)] (11) the mental and 216 
physical health of all individuals involved, except that a disability of a 217 
proposed custodial parent or other party, in and of itself, shall not be 218 
determinative of custody unless the proposed custodial arrangement is 219 
not in the best interests of the child; [(13)] (12) the child's cultural 220 
background; [(14)] (13) the effect on the child of the actions of an 221 
abuser, if any domestic violence has occurred between the parents or 222 
between a parent and another individual or the child; [(15)] (14) 223 
whether the child or a sibling of the child has been abused or 224 
neglected, as defined respectively in section 46b-120; and [(16)] (15) 225 
whether a party satisfactorily completed participation in a parenting 226 
education program established pursuant to section 46b-69b. Counsel or 227 
a guardian ad litem for the minor child shall not be required to assign 228 
any weight to any of the factors considered. 229 
(g) There shall be a rebuttable presumption that a parent is not 230 
acting in the best interests of a child when such parent's conduct 231 
evidences an unwillingness or inability to (1) facilitate and encourage 232 
the other parent's relationship with the child, as is appropriate under 233 
the circumstances, or (2) comply with court orders that seek to 234 
facilitate and encourage such relationship. 235 
Sec. 4. Section 46b-6 of the general statutes is repealed and the 236 
following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2019): 237 
(a) In any pending family relations matter the court [or any judge 238 
may cause] may order an investigation, evaluation or study to be made 239 
with respect to any circumstance of the matter which may be helpful 240 
or material or relevant to a proper disposition of the case. Such 241 
investigation, evaluation or study may include an examination of the 242 
parentage and surroundings of any child, his age, habits and history, 243 
inquiry into the home conditions, habits and character of his parents or 244  Raised Bill No.  7393 
 
 
 
LCO No. 6440   	9 of 13 
 
guardians and evaluation of his mental or physical condition. In any 245 
action for dissolution of marriage, legal separation or annulment of 246 
marriage such investigation, evaluation or study may include an 247 
examination into the age, habits and history of the parties, the causes 248 
of marital discord and the financial ability of the parties to furnish 249 
support to either spouse or any dependent child. 250 
(b) A report with respect to any investigation, evaluation or study, 251 
undertaken pursuant to subsection (a) of this section by an individual 252 
who is not an employee of the Judicial Department, shall be completed 253 
and filed with the court not later than one hundred twenty days after 254 
the date on which the court ordered such investigation, evaluation or 255 
study, unless the court enters a finding on the record that 256 
extraordinary circumstances warrant an extended period of time for 257 
the completion and filing of the report with respect to such 258 
investigation, evaluation or study. Upon the filing of such report, the 259 
court shall not order that a further investigation, evaluation or study 260 
be undertaken within the twelve-month period following the date on 261 
which the report was filed, unless the court enters a finding on the 262 
record that extraordinary circumstances necessitate that further 263 
investigation, evaluation or study be undertaken. 264 
(c) If the court orders that an investigation, evaluation or study be 265 
undertaken in any controversy involving the custody or care of a 266 
minor child, absent agreement of the parties, the court shall enter a 267 
finding on the record articulating the reasoning for undertaking such 268 
investigation, evaluation or study. 269 
(d) Whenever an investigation, evaluation or study has been 270 
ordered by the court pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, the case 271 
shall not be disposed of until a report with respect to such 272 
investigation, evaluation or study has been filed in accordance with 273 
this section, and counsel and the parties have had a reasonable 274 
opportunity to examine such report prior to the date on which the case 275 
is to be heard, unless the court orders that the case be heard before the 276 
report is filed. Unless otherwise permitted to do so by the court, 277  Raised Bill No.  7393 
 
 
 
LCO No. 6440   	10 of 13 
 
counsel for the parties, including any guardian ad litem, and any self-278 
represented parties shall not initiate contact with the individual who is 279 
undertaking the investigation, evaluation or study until such 280 
individual files a report in accordance with subsection (b) of this 281 
section. 282 
Sec. 5. Section 46b-6a of the general statutes is repealed and the 283 
following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2019): 284 
(a) In a family relations matter, as defined in section 46b-1, if a court 285 
orders that a parent undergo treatment from a qualified, licensed 286 
health care provider, the court shall permit the parent to select a 287 
qualified, licensed health care provider to provide such treatment. 288 
(b) In a family relations matter, as defined in section 46b-1, if a court 289 
orders that a child undergo treatment from a qualified, licensed health 290 
care provider, the court shall permit the parent or legal guardian of 291 
such child to select a qualified, licensed health care provider to provide 292 
such treatment. Except in a case where one of the parents has been 293 
awarded sole custody, if both parents do not agree on the selection of a 294 
qualified, licensed health care provider to provide such treatment to a 295 
child, the court shall continue the matter for two weeks to allow the 296 
parents an opportunity to jointly select a qualified, licensed health care 297 
provider. If after the two-week period, the parents have not reached an 298 
agreement on the selection of a qualified, licensed health care provider, 299 
the court shall select such provider after giving due consideration to 300 
the health insurance coverage and financial resources available to such 301 
parents.  302 
(c) (1) In a family relations matter, as defined in section 46b-1, if the 303 
parties agree or if a court orders that a parent or child undergo an 304 
evaluation from a qualified, licensed health care provider, the court 305 
shall first make a finding that the parties have the financial resources 306 
to pay for such evaluation.  307 
(2) If the court has determined that an evaluation can be undertaken 308 
and a qualified, licensed health care provider has been selected to 309  Raised Bill No.  7393 
 
 
 
LCO No. 6440   	11 of 13 
 
perform the evaluation, the court's order for an evaluation shall 310 
contain the name of each provider who is to undertake the evaluation, 311 
the estimated cost of the evaluation, each party's responsibility for the 312 
cost of the evaluation, the professional credentials of each provider 313 
and the estimated deadline by which such evaluation shall be 314 
completed and submitted to the court. 315 
(3) Not later than thirty days after the date of completion of such 316 
evaluation, the provider shall (A) file a report containing the results of 317 
the evaluation with the clerk of the court, who shall seal such report, 318 
and (B) unless otherwise ordered by the court, provide a copy of such 319 
report to counsel of record, including any guardian ad litem and any 320 
self-represented parties. Unless otherwise permitted by the court, 321 
counsel of record, including any guardian ad litem and any self-322 
represented parties shall not provide or otherwise disclose such report 323 
to any other person, except that counsel to the plaintiff or the 324 
defendant in the action may provide a copy of the report to his or her 325 
client. 326 
Sec. 6. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2019) (a) As used in this section, 327 
"personal identifying information" means: An individual's date of 328 
birth; mother's maiden name; motor vehicle operator's license number; 329 
Social Security number; other government-issued identification 330 
number, except for juris, license, permit or other business-related 331 
identification numbers that are otherwise made available to the public 332 
directly by any government agency or entity; health insurance 333 
identification number; or any financial account number, security code 334 
or personal identification number. "Personal identifying information" 335 
does not include a person's name unless a judicial authority has 336 
entered an order allowing the use of a pseudonym in place of the name 337 
of a party, in which case a person's name is included in the definition 338 
"personal identifying information". 339 
(b) Any person filing a document with the court, whether in an 340 
electronic or paper format, that includes personal identifying 341 
information shall redact any such information contained in the 342  Raised Bill No.  7393 
 
 
 
LCO No. 6440   	12 of 13 
 
document, unless otherwise required by law or ordered by the court. 343 
The party filing the redacted document shall retain the original, 344 
unredacted document throughout the pendency of the action, any 345 
appeal period and any applicable appellate process. 346 
(c) The person filing the document shall be solely responsible for 347 
omitting or redacting personal identifying information. The court or 348 
the clerk of the court shall not be responsible for reviewing any filed 349 
document to ensure compliance with the provisions of this section. 350 
Sec. 7. (NEW) (Effective July 1, 2019) (a) Notwithstanding the 351 
provisions of sections 46b-12, 46b-62, 51-296 and 51-296a of the general 352 
statutes, on and after January 1, 2020, in any family relations matter, as 353 
described in section 46b-1 of the general statutes, in which the court 354 
orders that a guardian ad litem be appointed on behalf of a minor 355 
child, the Division of Public Defender Services shall be solely 356 
responsible for the assignment of the guardian ad litem in such matter. 357 
(b) The Division of Public Defender Services shall: (1) Prescribe a 358 
uniform fee agreement applicable to the assignment of a guardian ad 359 
litem to a family relations matter under this section; and (2) develop 360 
and implement a methodology for calculating, on a sliding-scale basis, 361 
the fees due and owing from a person who is not indigent to the 362 
guardian ad litem assigned to a matter under this section. The 363 
maximum fee payable to a guardian ad litem pursuant to this section 364 
shall not exceed the fee prescribed by the Judicial Branch under section 365 
46b-62 of the general statutes for a couple with a gross combined 366 
income of one hundred thousand dollars.  367 
(c) The Division of Public Defender Services may assess an 368 
administrative fee to be paid by any person who is not indigent and 369 
who is assigned a guardian ad litem under the provisions of this 370 
section. Any administrative fees collected by the Division of Public 371 
Defender Services pursuant to this subsection shall be used by said 372 
division to defray costs incurred in connection with the administration 373 
of this section.  374  Raised Bill No.  7393 
 
 
 
LCO No. 6440   	13 of 13 
 
This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following 
sections: 
 
Section 1 October 1, 2019 46b-87 
Sec. 2 October 1, 2019 46b-56 
Sec. 3 October 1, 2019 46b-54 
Sec. 4 October 1, 2019 46b-6 
Sec. 5 October 1, 2019 46b-6a 
Sec. 7 July 1, 2019 New section 
 
Statement of Purpose:   
To make revisions to various statutes relating to court proceedings that 
concern family relations matters. 
[Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets. Proposed additions are indicated by underline, 
except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is 
not underlined.]