Connecticut House Bill HJ00092

Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/7/19
• Refer: 3/7/19

Caption

Resolution Granting The Claims Commissioner An Extension Of Time To Dispose Of The Claim Of Joe Burgos Vega.

Impact

The passage of HJ00092 would directly affect claim processing mechanisms within state administrative procedures. By granting an extension, the state acknowledges the complexity that can arise in legal claims against it. It emphasizes the importance of ensuring that all claims are adequately addressed rather than rushing to resolution, which can lead to oversight or injustice. This resolution reflects the state's commitment to careful and deliberate handling of claims, which is essential for maintaining legal integrity and public trust in state administrative processes.

Summary

HJ00092 is a Resolution granting the Claims Commissioner an extension of time to dispose of the claim of Joe Burgos Vega against the state. This bill was introduced and referred to the Judiciary Committee during the January 2019 session of the General Assembly. The essence of the resolution is to provide additional time for the Claims Commissioner to evaluate and make a decision on an existing claim, which is outlined under file number 24312. This procedural extension does not change the nature of the claim but allows for thorough consideration by the commissioner before a final decision is made.

Contention

While there may not be significant contention regarding the extension itself, resolutions like HJ00092 can ignite discussions regarding the efficiency of the Claims Commissioner's office and the broader implications of delays in legal claims processing. Stakeholders may argue about the accountability of the Claims Commissioner and the necessity of timely decisions, especially in cases where claimants may be adversely affected by extended processing times. Moreover, depending on public awareness of the claim in question, there could be debates surrounding the merits of how such extensions are granted and their implications for the state’s responsiveness to citizens’ claims.