Connecticut Senate Bill SB01042

Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/7/19
• Refer: 3/7/19
• Report Pass: 3/29/19
• Refer: 4/11/19
• Report Pass: 4/17/19

Caption

An Act Concerning The Automatic Dismissal Of State Elections Enforcement Commission Complaints.

Impact

This bill potentially streamlines the handling of complaints within the State Elections Enforcement Commission, as it shifts the procedural focus towards quicker resolutions. Stakeholders argue that by enforcing timelines and automatic dismissals for less serious complaints, the bill will alleviate administrative burdens and enhance operational efficiency. This has implications for how complaints regarding election laws are managed, thereby affecting the overall integrity and responsiveness of state election enforcement.

Summary

SB01042 is a legislative act aimed at modifying the process related to the dismissal of complaints lodged with the State Elections Enforcement Commission. The bill introduces a framework wherein complaints that do not demonstrate substantial violations of state election laws can be dismissed automatically after a specific timeframe. Additionally, it outlines the criteria under which complaints can be resolved, either through dismissal or further investigation, reinforcing the efficiency of the investigative process by setting clear deadlines for the commission's actions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB01042 appears to be mixed among lawmakers and advocacy groups. Supporters believe that simplification of the complaint process is paramount for maintaining an effective electoral system. Yet, opponents express concerns that automatic dismissals might undermine accountability and the thorough vetting of complaints, particularly those that may involve more nuanced or lesser-known violations of election law.

Contention

Notable points of contention focus on the automatic dismissal clause, which some critics argue could lead to important complaints being overlooked. The definitions introduced in the bill regarding 'foreign national' and 'foreign-influenced entity' also spark debate. These definitions could impact how cases involving foreign entities are approached and addressed within the state's election law framework, raising questions about the potential effects on state sovereignty and election security.