Connecticut Senate Bill SJ00051

Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 7/22/19

Caption

Resolution Concerning The Joint Rules Of The Reconvened Session Of The 2019 General Assembly.

Impact

The resolution modifies several procedural rules that govern how disapproved bills are reconsidered. Noteworthy changes include stipulations that no amendments may be made to any disapproved bill during the reconvened session. All disapproved bills must be sent back to their chamber of origin, where they can only be passed again if two-thirds of the membership approves them. This requirement could significantly impact the legislative process, creating a more stringent standard for overcoming a gubernatorial veto.

Summary

SJ00051, also known as the Resolution Concerning The Joint Rules Of The Reconvened Session Of The 2019 General Assembly, establishes the operational procedures for the reconvened session. The resolution effectively continues the rules from the previous 2019 regular session while making specific amendments related to the reconsideration of disapproved bills. The resolution outlines that the sole purpose of this session is to revisit bills that were passed by the General Assembly but vetoed by the Governor, establishing a clear framework for how these disapproved bills should be managed.

Contention

A key point of contention regarding SJ00051 stems from the limitations imposed on the reconsideration process. Critics may argue that the inability to amend disapproved bills during the reconvened session could stifle necessary changes that might address concerns raised by the Governor at the time of the veto. Furthermore, the requirement for a supermajority vote raises questions about whether enough support exists to overcome a veto, especially for bills with previously contentious provisions.

Standardization

By codifying these rules, SJ00051 aims to standardize the procedures associated with reconvened sessions, which could facilitate a more organized approach to handling legislation that has faced executive disapproval. While it clarifies the path forward for disapproved legislation, it also centralizes the authority to pass such bills, potentially reducing individual lawmakers' influence in the process.