Connecticut House Bill HJ00087

Connecticut 2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/16/20
• Refer: 3/16/20

Caption

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of George M. Leniart.

Impact

If enacted, HJ00087 will reinforce the Claims Commissioner's authority to dismiss claims and thereby clarify the state's position on the matter in question. This could have broader effects on how claims against the state are managed and processed, potentially streamlining future claims that may arise. The decision to affirm the dismissal signifies a reliance on the established procedures of claims handling within the state's jurisdiction, ensuring that unmerited claims do not burden the state financially.

Summary

House Joint Resolution No. 87 (HJ00087) aims to confirm the decision of the Claims Commissioner regarding the dismissal of a claim against the state made by George M. Leniart. The resolution essentially supports the previously made decision that orders the dismissal of Leniart's claim, which exceeds twenty thousand dollars. The bill was referred to the Judiciary Committee for consideration, indicating its legal implications and requirement for judicial review before any final actions on the claim can take place.

Contention

While specific points of contention surrounding HJ00087 were not documented in the materials provided, the nature of claims against the state often leads to debate regarding state accountability and the financial implications of such claims. Opponents or advocates of similar resolutions might argue about the fairness and criteria used in dismissing claims, especially when substantial amounts are involved. The decision could also impact public sentiment regarding state transparency and accountability when interacting with individual claims.