Connecticut House Bill HJ00109

Connecticut 2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/16/20
• Refer: 3/16/20

Caption

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Jeffrey Nield.

Impact

The confirmation of this resolution does not change existing state laws directly, as it primarily validates an administrative decision by the Claims Commissioner. However, it has implications for how claims against the state are treated and underscores the authority of the Claims Commissioner in dismissing financial claims. This process may affect the willingness of individuals to bring forward claims against the state, knowing that there is a system in place that can dismiss claims before they reach the legislative level.

Summary

House Joint Resolution 109 confirms the decision made by the Claims Commissioner to dismiss a claim against the state brought forth by Jeffrey Nield. The claim was significant, exceeding one million dollars, and the resolution finalizes the commissioner's order of dismissal, affirming that the state will not be liable for the claim made by Nield. This resolution is procedural, ensuring that there is legislative affirmation regarding the dismissal of claims made against the state, thus clarifying the state's stance on this matter.

Contention

There are inherent contentions in such decisions, particularly regarding the transparency and fairness in the handling of claims against the state. Supporters of the resolution may argue that it promotes efficiency in dealing with claims, whereas opponents may raise concerns about the potential for unjust dismissals and the need for a more thorough examination of claims presented. The context under which claims are dismissed could lead to significant discussions about state accountability and financial oversight.