Connecticut 2020 2020 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00251 Introduced / Bill

Filed 02/25/2020

                        
 
LCO No. 2073  	1 of 9 
 
General Assembly  Raised Bill No. 251  
February Session, 2020  
LCO No. 2073 
 
 
Referred to Committee on GENERAL LAW  
 
 
Introduced by:  
(GL)  
 
 
 
 
AN ACT CONCERNING TH E AVAILABILITY OF GENERIC 
PHARMACEUTICALS. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General 
Assembly convened: 
 
Section 1. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2020) For purposes of this 1 
section and section 2 of this act: 2 
(1) "ANDA" means abbreviated new drug application. 3 
(2) "ANDA filer" means a party that owns or controls an ANDA filed 4 
with the Food and Drug Administration or has the exclusive rights 5 
under that ANDA to distribute the ANDA product. 6 
(3) "Agreement resolving or settling a patent infringement claim" 7 
includes any agreement that is entered into not later than thirty days 8 
after the resolution or the settlement of the claim, or any other 9 
agreement that is contingent upon, provides a contingent condition for, 10 
or is otherwise related to the resolution or settlement of the claim. 11 
"Agreement resolving or settling a patent infringement claim" includes, 12 
but is not limited to, the following: 13  Raised Bill No.  251 
 
 
 
LCO No. 2073   	2 of 9 
 
(A) Any agreement required to be provided to the Federal Trade 14 
Commission or the Antitrust Division of the United States Department 15 
of Justice under the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and 16 
Modernization Act of 2003. 17 
(B) Any agreement between a biosimilar or interchangeable 18 
biological product applicant and a reference drug product sponsor that 19 
resolves patent claims between the applicant and sponsor. 20 
(4) "Biosimilar biological product application filer" means a party that 21 
owns or controls a biosimilar biological product application filed with 22 
the Food and Drug Administration under subsection (k) of section 351 23 
of the Public Health Service Act, 42 USC 262, for licensure of a biological 24 
product as biosimilar to, or interchangeable with, a reference drug 25 
product or that has the exclusive rights under the application to 26 
distribute the biosimilar biological product. 27 
(5) "NDA" means new drug application. 28 
(6) "Nonreference drug filer" means (A) an ANDA filer, or (B) a 29 
biosimilar biological product application filer. 30 
(7) "Nonreference drug product" means the product to be 31 
manufactured under an ANDA that is the subject of the patent 32 
infringement claim, a biosimilar biological product that is the product 33 
to be manufactured under the biosimilar biological product application 34 
that is the subject of the patent infringement claim, or both. 35 
(8) "Patent infringement" means infringement of any patent or of any 36 
filed patent application, extension, reissue, renewal, division, 37 
continuation, continuation in part, reexamination, patent term 38 
restoration, patents of addition and extensions thereof. 39 
(9) "Patent infringement claim" means any allegation made to a 40 
nonreference drug filer, whether or not included in a complaint filed 41 
with a court of law, that its nonreference drug product or application 42 
infringes any patent held by, or exclusively licensed to, the reference 43  Raised Bill No.  251 
 
 
 
LCO No. 2073   	3 of 9 
 
drug holder. 44 
(10) "Reference drug holder" means:  45 
(A) A brand holder that is any of the following: 46 
(i) The holder of an approved NDA for a drug product application 47 
filed under subsection (b) of section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and 48 
Cosmetic Act, 21 USC 355, 49 
(ii) A person owning or controlling enforcement of the patent listed 50 
in the Approved Drug Products With Therapeutic Equivalence 51 
Evaluations, commonly known as the "FDA Orange Book" in connection 52 
with the NDA, or 53 
(iii) The predecessors, subsidiaries, divisions, groups and affiliates 54 
controlled by, controlling or under common control with, any of the 55 
entities described in this subparagraph or subparagraph (B) of this 56 
subdivision, with control to be presumed by direct or indirect share 57 
ownership of fifty per cent or greater, as well as the licensees, licensors, 58 
successors and assigns of each of those entities, or 59 
(B) A biological product license holder, which includes any of the 60 
following: 61 
(i) The holder of an approved biological product license application 62 
for a biological drug product under subsection (a) of section 351 of the 63 
Public Health Service Act, 42 USC 262, 64 
(ii) A person owning or controlling enforcement of any patents that 65 
claim the biological product that is the subject of the approved biological 66 
patent license application, or 67 
(iii) The predecessors, subsidiaries, divisions, groups and affiliates 68 
controlled by, controlling or under common control with, any of the 69 
entities described in this subparagraph or subparagraph (A) of this 70 
subdivision, with control to be presumed by direct or indirect share 71 
ownership of fifty per cent or greater, as well as the licensees, licensors, 72  Raised Bill No.  251 
 
 
 
LCO No. 2073   	4 of 9 
 
successors and assigns of each of those entities. 73 
(11) "Reference drug product" means the product to be manufactured 74 
by the reference drug holder and includes branded drugs of the NDA 75 
holder and the biological drug product of the biological product license 76 
applicant. 77 
(12) "Statutory exclusivity" means those prohibitions on the approval 78 
of drug applications under subsection (c) of section 505, section 527 or 79 
505A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 USC 355, 360cc 80 
and 355a, or on the licensing of biological product applications under 81 
subsection (k) or (m) of section 262 of the Public Health Service Act, 42 82 
USC 262. 83 
Sec. 2. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2020) (a) (1) Except as provided in 84 
subdivision (3) of this subsection, an agreement resolving or settling, on 85 
a final or interim basis, a patent infringement claim, shall be presumed 86 
to have anticompetitive effects and shall be a violation of this section if 87 
both of the following apply: 88 
(A) A nonreference drug filer receives anything of value from 89 
another company asserting patent infringement, including, but not 90 
limited to, an exclusive license or a promise that the brand company will 91 
not launch an authorized generic version of its brand drug; and 92 
(B) The nonreference drug filer agrees to limit or forego research, 93 
development, manufacturing, marketing or sales of the nonreference 94 
drug filer's product for any period of time. 95 
(2) As used in subparagraph (A) of subdivision (1) of this subsection, 96 
"anything of value" does not include a settlement of a patent 97 
infringement claim in which the consideration granted by the brand or 98 
reference drug filer to the nonreference drug filer as part of the 99 
resolution or settlement consists of one or more of the following: 100 
(A) The right to market the competing product in the United States 101 
before the expiration of either: 102  Raised Bill No.  251 
 
 
 
LCO No. 2073   	5 of 9 
 
(i) A patent that is the basis for the patent infringement claim, or 103 
(ii) A patent right or other statutory exclusivity that would prevent 104 
the marketing of the drug, 105 
(B) A covenant not to sue on a claim that the nonreference drug 106 
product infringes a United States patent; 107 
(C) Compensation for saved reasonable future litigation expenses of 108 
the reference drug holder but only if both of the following are true: 109 
(i) The total compensation for saved litigation expenses is reflected in 110 
budgets that the reference drug holder documented and adopted at least 111 
six months before the settlement, and 112 
(ii) The compensation does not exceed the lower of the following: 113 
(I) Seven million five hundred thousand dollars, or 114 
(II) Five per cent of the revenue that the nonreference drug holder 115 
projected or forecasted it would receive in the first three years of sales 116 
of its version of the reference drug documented at least twelve months 117 
before the settlement. If no projections or forecasts are available, the 118 
compensation does not exceed two hundred fifty thousand dollars; 119 
(D) An agreement resolving or settling a patent infringement claim 120 
that permits a nonreference drug filer to begin selling, offering for sale 121 
or distributing the nonreference drug product if the reference drug 122 
holder seeks approval to launch, obtains approval to launch or launches 123 
a different dosage, strength or form of the reference drug having the 124 
same active ingredient before the date set by the agreement for entry of 125 
the nonreference drug filer. A different form of the reference drug does 126 
not include an authorized generic version of the reference drug; 127 
(E) An agreement by the reference drug holder not to interfere with 128 
the nonreference drug filer's ability to secure and maintain regulatory 129 
approval to market the nonreference drug product or an agreement to 130 
facilitate the nonreference drug filer's ability to secure and maintain 131  Raised Bill No.  251 
 
 
 
LCO No. 2073   	6 of 9 
 
regulatory approval to market the nonreference drug product; or 132 
(F) An agreement resolving a patent infringement claim in which the 133 
reference drug holder forgives the potential damages accrued by a 134 
nonreference drug holder for an at-risk launch of the nonreference drug 135 
product that is the subject of that claim. 136 
(3) Parties to an agreement are not in violation of subdivision (1) of 137 
this subsection if they can demonstrate by a preponderance of the 138 
evidence that either of the following are met: 139 
(A) The value received by the nonreference drug filer described in 140 
subparagraph (A) of subdivision (1) of this subsection is a fair and 141 
reasonable compensation solely for other goods or services that the 142 
nonreference drug filer has promised to provide, or 143 
(B) The agreement has directly generated procompetitive benefits 144 
and the procompetitive benefits of the agreement outweigh the 145 
anticompetitive effects of the agreement. 146 
(b) In determining whether the parties to the agreement have met 147 
their burden under subdivision (3) of subsection (a) of this section, the 148 
factfinder shall not presume any of the following: 149 
(1) That entry into the marketplace could not have occurred until the 150 
expiration of the relevant patent exclusivity or that the agreement's 151 
provision for entry of the nonreference drug product before the 152 
expiration of any patent exclusivity means that the agreement is 153 
procompetitive within the meaning of subparagraph (B) of subdivision 154 
(3) of subsection (a) of this section, 155 
(2) That any patent is enforceable and infringed by the nonreference 156 
drug filer in the absence of a final adjudication binding on the filer of 157 
those issues, 158 
(3) That the agreement caused no delay in entry of the nonreference 159 
drug filer's drug product because of the lack of federal Food and Drug 160 
Administration approval of that or of another nonreference drug 161  Raised Bill No.  251 
 
 
 
LCO No. 2073   	7 of 9 
 
product, or 162 
(4) That the agreement caused no harm or delay due to the possibility 163 
that the nonreference drug filer's drug product might infringe some 164 
patent that has not been asserted against the nonreference drug filer or 165 
that is not subject to a final and binding adjudication on that filer as to 166 
the patent's scope, enforceability and infringement. 167 
This subsection shall not be construed to preclude a party from 168 
introducing evidence regarding subdivisions (1) to (4), inclusive, of this 169 
subsection and shall not be construed to preclude the factfinder from 170 
making a determination regarding said subdivisions based on the full 171 
scope of the evidence. 172 
(c) In determining whether the parties to the agreement have met 173 
their burden under subdivision (3) of subsection (a) of this section, the 174 
factfinder shall presume that the relevant product market is that market 175 
consisting of the brand or reference drug of the company alleging patent 176 
infringement and the drug product of the nonreference company 177 
accused of infringement and any other biological product that is 178 
licensed as biosimilar or is an AB-rated generic to the reference product. 179 
(d) (1) The provisions of this section shall not modify, impair, limit or 180 
supersede the right of any drug company applicant to assert claims or 181 
counterclaims against any person under the antitrust laws or other laws 182 
relating to unfair competition of the federal antitrust law or state law. 183 
(2) If any provision of this section, an amendment made to this 184 
section or the application of any provision or amendment to any person 185 
or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this 186 
section, the amendments made to this section and the application of the 187 
provisions of this section or amendments to any person or circumstance 188 
shall not be affected. 189 
(e) (1) (A) Each person that violates or assists in the violation of this 190 
section shall forfeit and pay to the state a civil penalty sufficient to deter 191 
violations of this section, as follows: 192  Raised Bill No.  251 
 
 
 
LCO No. 2073   	8 of 9 
 
(i) If the person who violated this section received any value due to 193 
that violation, an amount up to three times the value received by the 194 
party that is reasonably attributable to the violation of this section, or 195 
twenty million dollars, whichever is greater. 196 
(ii) If the violator has not received anything of value as described in 197 
subparagraph (A)(i), an amount up to three times the value given to 198 
other parties to the agreement reasonably attributable to the violation of 199 
this section, or twenty million dollars, whichever is greater. 200 
(iii) For purposes of this subdivision, "reasonably attributable to the 201 
violation" shall be determined by the state's share of the market for the 202 
brand drug at issue in the agreement. 203 
(B) Any penalty described in subparagraph (A) of this subdivision 204 
shall accrue only to the state and shall be recovered in a civil action 205 
brought by the Attorney General against any party to an agreement that 206 
violates this section. 207 
(2) Each party that violates or assists in the violation of this section 208 
shall be liable for any damages, penalties, costs, fees, injunctions, or 209 
other remedies that may be just and reasonable, as determined by the 210 
court. 211 
(3) If the state is awarded penalties under subparagraph (A) of 212 
subdivision (1) of this subsection, it may not recover penalties pursuant 213 
to subdivision (2) of this subsection. This section shall not be construed 214 
to foreclose the state's ability to claim any relief or damages available in 215 
subdivision (2) of this subsection, other than those that are penalties. 216 
(4) An action to enforce a cause of action for a violation of this section 217 
shall be commenced within four years after the cause of action accrued. 218 
This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following 
sections: 
 
Section 1 October 1, 2020 New section 
Sec. 2 October 1, 2020 New section  Raised Bill No.  251 
 
 
 
LCO No. 2073   	9 of 9 
 
 
Statement of Purpose:   
To preserve consumer access to affordable generic drugs. 
[Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets. Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except 
that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not 
underlined.]