Connecticut Senate Bill SJ00020

Connecticut 2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/24/20
• Refer: 2/24/20
• Report Pass: 2/28/20
• Engrossed: 3/4/20
• Report Pass: 3/6/20
• Passed: 3/11/20

Caption

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable Gladys Idelis Nieves Of New Haven To Be A Member Of The Judicial Review Council As An Alternate Family Support Magistrate.

Impact

The approval of this resolution holds significance for the state's judicial system as it ensures that the Judicial Review Council has the necessary personnel to perform its role effectively. The council's responsibilities include overseeing the actions of family support magistrates, which is critical in matters concerning family law and support determinations. Thus, confirming a qualified and dedicated individual like Nieves to this position reinforces the integrity of the family support magistrate's role within Connecticut's judicial framework.

Summary

SJ00020 is a resolution that confirms the nomination of the Honorable Gladys Idelis Nieves of New Haven as a member of the Judicial Review Council, serving as an alternate Family Support Magistrate. This resolution was introduced by Senate members Duff and Vargas and is part of the executive and legislative nominations process. The appointment is intended to fill the vacancy left by the Honorable Frederic Gilman and will be effective until a successor is appointed, or November 30, 2021, whichever is longer.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SJ00020 appears to be positive, as the resolution passed unanimously with a vote of 33 to 0. This level of bipartisan support suggests a consensus on the importance of appointing competent individuals to judicial bodies and the importance of having sufficient representation within the Judicial Review Council. Supporters likely view this confirmation as a sound decision that upholds the standards of the judicial system.

Contention

There are minimal points of contention regarding SJ00020, primarily because the resolution pertains to a nomination rather than contentious legislation. However, discussions in the legislative context may revolve around the requisite qualifications for judicial nominees and the transparency of the appointment process. As the bill is a straightforward appointment resolution, significant opposition is not prevalent.