Connecticut 2021 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05429 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 03/18/2021

                     
Researcher: HP 	Page 1 	3/18/21 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
sHB 5429  
 
AN ACT CONCERNING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY, VISION ZERO 
COUNCIL, SPEED LIMITS IN MUNICIPALITIES, FINES AND 
CHARGES FOR CERTAIN VIOLATIONS, THE GREENWAYS 
COMMEMORATIVE ACCOUNT AND MAINTENANCE WORK ZONE 
AND SCHOOL ZONE SAFETY ENFORCEMENT.  
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS: 
§ 1 — YIELDING TO PEDESTRIANS AT CROSSWALKS 
Expands the circumstances under which drivers must yield to pedestrians at uncontrolled 
crosswalks 
§ 2 — VISION ZERO 
Establishes a Vision Zero Council and charges it with developing a statewide policy to 
eliminate all transportation-related fatalities and severe injuries 
§ 3 — CERTIFICATE OF OPERATION FOR MAJOR TRAFFIC 
GENERATORS 
Requires OSTA to consider major traffic generators’ impact on bicycle and pedestrian 
access and safety when awarding certificates of operation 
§ 4 — DOORING 
Prohibits causing physical contact with moving traffic by (1) opening a vehicle door or (2) 
leaving it open longer than necessary to load or unload passengers 
§ 5 — MUNICIPAL SURCHARGE 
Increases, from $20 to $25, the surcharge on certain moving violations that is remitted to 
municipalities and subjects dooring violations to the surcharge 
§§ 6-12 — LOCAL ROAD SPEED LIMITS AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY 
ZONES 
Allows municipalities to establish speed limits on local roads without OSTA approval and 
allows for the establishment of pedestrian safety zones with speed limits as low as 15 mph 
in downtown districts and community centers 
§ 13 — DISTRACTED DRIVING FINES 
Increases the fines for distracted driving 
§ 14 — GREENWAYS COMMEMORAT IVE PLATES 
Requires that greenways commemorative plate fees be deposited into a dedicated account 
and used to fund grant programs for greenways and other bicycle and pedestrian trails 
§§ 5, 15-17, 19 & 21-23 — SPEED CAMERAS IN MAINTENANCE 
WORK ZONES AND SCHOO L AND HOSPITAL ZONES  2021HB-05429-R000083-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: HP 	Page 2 	3/18/21 
 
Allows the use of speed cameras to enforce speed violations in (1) maintenance work zones 
and (2) school and hospital zones under a pilot program in up to 10 municipalities 
§ 18 — WORK ZONE SAFETY ACC OUNT 
Requires that money in the work zone safety account be used only to pay costs of state 
police traffic enforcement in highway work zones 
§ 20 — HOSPITAL ZONES 
Allows LTAs to establish hospital zones on roads adjacent or sufficiently close to hospital 
property 
BACKGROUND 
 
SUMMARY 
This bill creates programs for using speed cameras to detect and 
enforce violations in school and hospital zones, under a pilot program 
the bill establishes, and in maintenance work zones. These programs 
may begin operation in 2023, and only if the Departm ent of 
Transportation (DOT) adopts regulations on speed camera data 
privacy and related matters.  
The bill allows for (1) local control of speed limits on local roads and 
(2) the establishment of pedestrian safety zones. 
It also makes changes related to bicycle and pedestrian access and 
safety, such as: 
1. expanding the circumstances under which drivers must yield to 
pedestrians at uncontrolled crosswalks, 
2. establishing a Vision Zero Council with the goal of eliminating 
transportation-related deaths and serious injuries, 
3. establishing an infraction for “dooring” moving traffic, 
4. increasing distracted driving fines, and 
5. dedicating revenue from greenways commemorative license 
plates to fund greenways-related grant programs. 
It also makes a number of technical and conforming changes. 
EFFECTIVE DATE:  October 1, 2021, unless otherwise noted below.  2021HB-05429-R000083-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: HP 	Page 3 	3/18/21 
 
§ 1 — YIELDING TO PEDESTRIANS AT CROSSWALKS 
Expands the circumstances under which drivers must yield to pedestrians at uncontrolled 
crosswalks 
The bill expands the circumstances under which drivers must yield 
the right-of-way to pedestrians at marked and unmarked crosswalks 
that are not controlled by traffic signals or police officers (i.e., 
uncontrolled crosswalks).  
Under current law, a driver must yield to a pedestrian, slowing or 
stopping as necessary, if the pedestrian has stepped off the curb or into 
the crosswalk at the entrance. Under the bill, a driver must do so if the 
pedestrian:  
1. is within any portion of the crosswalk;  
2. steps to the curb at a crosswalk’s entrance and indicates intent 
to cross the road by raising his or her hand and arm toward 
oncoming traffic; or  
3. indicates intent to cross the road by moving into the crosswalk’s 
entrance any body part or any extension of a body part, 
including a wheelchair, cane, walking stick, crutch, bicycle, 
electric bicycle, stroller, carriage, cart, or leashed or harnessed 
dog.  
As under existing law, drivers who fail to yield at a crosswalk when 
required are subject to a $500 fine.  
By law, pedestrians crossing at crosswalks controlled by traffic 
signals or police officers may cross only as indicated by the signal or 
officer. Pedestrians must also yield the right of way to emergency 
vehicles.  
§ 2 — VISION ZERO 
Establishes a Vision Zero Council and charges it with developing a statewide policy to 
eliminate all transportation-related fatalities and severe injuries 
The bill establishes a Vision Zero Council and charges it with 
developing a statewide policy and interagency approach to eliminate 
all transportation-related fatalities and severe injuries to pedestrians,  2021HB-05429-R000083-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: HP 	Page 4 	3/18/21 
 
bicyclists, transit users, drivers, and passengers. It must consider ways 
to improve safety in all transportation modes using data, new 
partnerships, safe planning, and community-based solutions to 
achieve the goal of zero transportation-related fatalities. 
The council is composed of the DOT, Department of Motor Vehicles 
(DMV), and Department of Energy and Environmental Protection 
(DEEP) commissioners and any other agency commissioners they 
invite. Any commissioner may instead send a designee. The DOT 
commissioner, or his designee, serves as chairperson of the council and 
must schedule its first meeting by September 1, 2021. DOT must also 
serve as administrative staff for the council.  
Starting by February 1, 2022, the council must annually submit the 
statewide policy and interagency approach, along with any other 
recommendations, to the Transportation Committee. 
EFFECTIVE DATE:  Upon passage 
§ 3 — CERTIFICATE OF OPERA TION FOR MAJOR TRAFFIC 
GENERATORS 
Requires OSTA to consider major traffic generators’ impact on bicycle and pedestrian 
access and safety when awarding certificates of operation 
The law generally requires an entity that is building, expanding, 
establishing, or operating an open air theatre, shopping center, or any 
other development generating large volumes of traffic that 
substantially affect highway traffic (i.e., “major traffic generators”) to 
obtain the Office of the State Traffic Administration’s (OSTA) 
certification that the operation will not endanger public safety. State 
regulations specify that a development qualifies as a major traffic 
generator if it has (1) 200 or more parking spaces or (2) a gross floor 
area of at least 100,000 square feet (Conn. Agencies Regs. § 14-312-1). 
Existing law (1) establishes a number of factors that OSTA must 
include in its consideration of highway safety (e.g., traffic density and 
highway width and character) and (2) allows OSTA to require 
applicants to make certain improvements t o address the 
development’s highway safety impact. The bill adds bicycle and  2021HB-05429-R000083-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: HP 	Page 5 	3/18/21 
 
pedestrian access and safety to the factors OSTA must consider and 
allows it to require improvements that address impacts to bicycle and 
pedestrian access and safety, conforming to current OSTA practice.  
§ 4 — DOORING  
Prohibits causing physical contact with moving traffic by (1) opening a vehicle door or (2) 
leaving it open longer than necessary to load or unload passengers 
The bill prohibits a person from causing physical contact between a 
vehicle door and moving traffic by (1) opening the door or (2) leaving 
it open longer than is necessary to load or unload passengers. 
Violations of the bill are infractions. 
Under the bill, “moving traffic” includes (1) motor vehicles, 
bicycles, electric bicycles, and electric foot scooters traveling on the 
highway and (2) pedestrians and people riding bicycles, electric 
bicycles, or electric foot scooters on sidewalks, shoulders, or bikeways. 
§ 5 — MUNICIPAL SURCHARGE 
Increases, from $20 to $25, the surcharge on certain moving violations that is remitted to 
municipalities and subjects dooring violations to the surcharge 
The act increases, from $20 to $25, the surcharge paid, in addition to 
a fine, by people who violate specified motor vehicle laws, regulations, 
and ordinances, such as speeding and reckless driving. It also adds 
dooring to the list of violations to which the surcharge applies. 
By law, the state must remit this fee to the municipality in which a 
violation occurs. 
§§ 6-12 — LOCAL ROAD SPEED LIMITS AND PEDESTRIAN 
SAFETY ZONES 
Allows municipalities to establish speed limits on local roads without OSTA approval and 
allows for the establishment of pedestrian safety zones with speed limits as low as 15 mph 
in downtown districts and community centers 
By law, a municipality’s local traffic authority (LTA) is responsible 
for setting speed limits on streets, highways, or bridges or parking 
areas for 10 or more cars within the town’s jurisdiction (i.e., local 
roads). But under current law, the LTA must obtain approval from 
OSTA before the limits can take effect.    2021HB-05429-R000083-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: HP 	Page 6 	3/18/21 
 
Under certain conditions, the bill allows LTAs to establish or modify 
speed limits on local roads without OSTA approval and establish 
pedestrian safety zones on those roads. It also allows OSTA to 
establish pedestrian safety zones on state roads at an LTA’s or DOT’s 
request. 
By law, the entity designated as the LTA varies by town, but may be 
the police commission, board of selectman, mayor, town manager, 
police chief, or traffic authority (CGS § 14-297(6)). 
The bill also makes numerous technical and conforming changes. 
EFFECTIVE DATE:  July 1, 2021, for the provisions allowing LTAs 
to set local speed limits and authorizing the establishment of 
pedestrian safety zones; October 1, 2021, for the other provisions, 
including certain conforming changes.  
Speed Limits on Local Roads  
The bill allows LTAs to establish or modify speed limits on local 
roads without OSTA approval, as long as the LTA:  
1. establishes, modifies, and maintains speed limits on all roads, 
bridges, and parking areas under its jurisdiction; 
2. conducts an engineering study (see below); 
3. notifies OSTA of its intent to assume responsibility and 
authority for establishing speed limits within its jurisdiction; 
and 
4. notifies DOT of each speed limit change so the department can 
maintain a statewide inventory of speed limits. 
Under the bill, LTAs may not set a speed limit lower than 20 mph 
unless (1) the speed limit is part of a pedestrian safety zone (see below) 
or (2) the engineering study indicates a speed limit lower than 25 mph 
is reasonable. Under existing law and the bill, LTAs may establish 
speed limits on private roads wholly within the municipality under its 
jurisdiction without OSTA approval.  2021HB-05429-R000083-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: HP 	Page 7 	3/18/21 
 
The bill also (1) specifies that any speed limit established with OSTA 
approval remains in effect until the LTA modifies it and (2) makes 
conforming changes to specify that exceeding a speed limit established 
by an LTA without OSTA approval is prima facie evidence that a 
driver is traveling unreasonably fast. 
Pedestrian Safety Zones 
The bill authorizes LTAs, in the case of local roads, or OSTA, in the 
case of state roads, to establish pedestrian safety zones with speed 
limits as low as 15 mph on roads in clearly defined downtown districts 
and community centers frequented by pedestrians. 
Under the bill, LTAs may establish a zone on local roads after 
completing an engineering study as the bill requires. In municipalities 
where OSTA approves speed limits, LTAs must notify OSTA in 
writing that it is establishing a pedestrian safety zone and confirm that 
the bill’s applicable requirements have been satisfied. 
If an LTA or DOT seeks to establish a pedestrian safety zone on a 
state highway that passes through a downtown district or community 
center, it must submit a written request for approval to OSTA that 
includes the required engineering study and speed management plan. 
If OSTA denies the request, it must provide a written explanation of 
the reasons for doing so. 
Engineering Studies and Speed Management Plans 
Under the bill, before an LTA establishes or modifies a speed limit 
or establishes a pedestrian safety zone, the LTA must conduct an 
engineering study in accordance with the Federal Highway 
Administration’s (FHWA) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices 
(MUTCD) and other generally accepted engineering principles and 
guidance. (A study must also be conducted in order for OSTA to 
approve an LTA’s or DOT’s request for a pedestrian safety zone on a 
state highway.) 
The study must be completed by a professional engineer licensed in 
the state and consider factors including pedestrian activity, land use  2021HB-05429-R000083-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: HP 	Page 8 	3/18/21 
 
and development, parking, and traffic accident records in the LTA’s 
jurisdiction or area under consideration for a pedestrian safety zone. 
If an engineering study on establishing a pedestrian safety zone 
recommends doing so, the study must also include a speed 
management plan and recommended actions to achieve lower motor 
vehicle speeds. 
Regulations 
The bill authorizes OSTA to adopt regulations on (1) setting local 
speed limits without OSTA approval and (2) establishing pedestrian 
safety zones. 
§ 13 — DISTRACTED DRIVING FINES  
Increases the fines for distracted driving  
The bill increases the fines for violating the state’s distracted driving 
law from (1) $150 to $200 for a first violation, (2) $300 to $375 for a 
second violation, and (3) $500 to $625 for a third or subsequent 
violation. 
The distracted driving law generally prohibits a person, while 
driving, from using a handheld mobile telephone to engage in a call, 
using a mobile electronic device (e.g., texting), and engaging in any 
activity unrelated to driving in a manner that interferes with safely 
operating the vehicle, among other things. 
§ 14 — GREENWAYS COMMEMORAT IVE PLATES 
Requires that greenways commemorative plate fees be deposited into a dedicated account 
and used to fund grant programs for greenways and other bicycle and pedestrian trails 
Under current law, the purpose of greenways commemorative 
plates is to enhance public awareness of state and local efforts to 
preserve, restore, and protect greenways. The money collected from 
the special fee for greenways plates, less a $15 administrative fee, goes 
to the General Fund.  
The bill expands the purpose of the plate to include providing 
funding for greenways and requires that the money collected be 
deposited in the “greenways commemorative account,” which the bill  2021HB-05429-R000083-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: HP 	Page 9 	3/18/21 
 
establishes as a separate, nonlapsing account within the General Fund. 
Account funds must be spent by DEEP for the greenways capital grant 
program and the bikeway, pedestrian walkway, recreation trail, and 
greenways grant program. 
The bill also (1) codifies regulations regarding greenways plate fees, 
(2) allows, rather than requires, the DMV commissioner to establish 
regulations on the plates, and (3) eliminates the requirement that any 
regulations be developed in consultation with DEEP. 
§§ 5, 15-17, 19 & 21-23 — SPEED CAMERAS IN MAI NTENANCE 
WORK ZONES AND SCHOO L AND HOSPITAL ZONES 
Allows the use of speed cameras to enforce speed violations in (1) maintenance work zones 
and (2) school and hospital zones under a pilot program in up to 10 municipalities 
The bill authorizes the use of speed cameras (“automated traffic 
enforcement safety devices”) to detect and enforce violations for 
exceeding the posted speed limit by 11 mph or more in (1) 
maintenance work zones and (2) school and hospital zones under a 
pilot program the bill establishes. The cameras may be operated only 
(1) on or after January 1, 2023, and (2) after DOT has adopted privacy-
related regulations as the bill requires (see below). 
The bill defines “automated traffic enforcement safety device” as a 
photographic, radar, or laser device or other electrical or mechanical 
device that (1) records motor vehicles’ speed and (2) produces one or 
more recorded images indicating the date, time, and location of each 
vehicle committing a speed camera violation (i.e., exceeding the posted 
speed limit by 11 mph or more in a zone monitored by a speed camera, 
see below). 
Maintenance Work Zone Speed Cameras (§ 15) 
The bill allows the DOT commissioner to install, operate, and 
maintain speed cameras in maintenance work zones or enter into an 
agreement with a contractor to do so. A “maintenance work zone” is 
an area of limited access highway where DOT is performing 
maintenance work.  
The bill establishes requirements for operating speed cameras,  2021HB-05429-R000083-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: HP 	Page 10 	3/18/21 
 
including that: 
1. at least one highway worker (see BACKGROUND) must be 
present in the zone,  
2. state police must not be performing highway traffic 
enforcement or control in the zone pursuant to a memorandum 
of understanding,  
3. signs indicating that the cameras are being used must be posted 
at least 500 feet ahead of the zone, and  
4. the cameras must be removed from the zone after the 
maintenance work is complete. 
School and Hospital Zones Speed Camera Pilot Program (§ 21) 
The bill requires the Office of Policy and Management (OPM) 
secretary, in consultation with the DOT commissioner, to establish a 
pilot program allowing up to 10 municipalities to install, operate, and 
maintain speed cameras in school and hospital zones (see below) or to 
enter into an agreement with a contractor to do so. OPM may allow 
these municipalities to participate in the program for a period of five 
years from when the first camera starts operating in the municipality, 
and each participating municipality may operate cameras in up to 12 
school and hospital zones. 
Under the bill, participating municipalities must consider certain 
factors when selecting zones for speed camera operation, including a 
zone’s speed data, crash history, and roadway geometry. The bill 
requires that towns post signs indicating that speed cameras are in use 
proximate to the signs indicating the designated school or hospital 
zone.  
Image Review and Ticket Issuance (§§ 15 (c)-(d) & 21 (c)-(d)) 
Under the bill, police officers must review speed camera images and 
issue tickets—state police in the case of cameras in maintenance work 
zones and state or municipal police in the case of the pilot program.   2021HB-05429-R000083-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: HP 	Page 11 	3/18/21 
 
Whenever a speed camera detects, and produces a recorded image 
of, the license plate of a vehicle allegedly committing a speed camera 
violation, a police officer must review the images. If, after doing so, the 
officer determines there are reasonable grounds to believe a speed 
camera violation occurred, the officer may authorize a citation for the 
violation. However, under the pilot program, police must issue 
warnings for violations occurring in the first 30 days after a camera 
begins operating.  
If an officer issues a ticket or a warning, the state police or the 
municipal police department must mail the ticket and a copy of the 
recorded images to the vehicle’s registered owner within (1) 10 days 
after the alleged violation in a maintenance work zone and (2) 30 days 
after the alleged violation in a school or hospital zone. Violations are 
processed through the Centralized Infractions Bureau (CIB) (see 
BACKGROUND). 
Under the bill, a recorded image that clearly shows the license plate 
of a vehicle exceeding the posted speed limit by 11 mph or more in a 
maintenance work, school, or hospital zone is sufficient proof of the 
vehicle’s identity. Proof of registration number is prima facie evidence 
that the vehicle’s owner was driving at the time of the violation, except 
that for rented or leased motor vehicles, it is proof that the lessee was 
driving.   
Use of Speed Cameras to Support Conviction (§§ 15 (e), 19 & 
21(e)) 
Under the bill, there is a prima facie presumption of a speed 
camera’s accuracy sufficient to support a violation only upon 
testimony from a DOT employee, municipal employee, or a contactor, 
as applicable, that: 
1. the employee or contractor has adequate experience and 
training in installing, maintaining, and operating speed 
cameras; 
2. the speed camera was in proper working condition when it 
detected and recorded a motor vehicle allegedly committing a  2021HB-05429-R000083-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: HP 	Page 12 	3/18/21 
 
speed camera violation, established by proof that the suggested 
methods were followed for testing the camera’s proper 
functioning; 
3. the speed camera was used in an area where road conditions 
provide a minimum possibility of distortion; and 
4. the speed camera was expertly tested within a reasonable time 
after it detected and recorded the vehicle, and the testing was 
done in a way that does not rely on the camera’s internal 
calibrations. 
Available Defenses (§§ 15(f) & 21(f)) 
The bill makes all defenses available to a person who allegedly 
committed a speed camera violation. These defenses specifically 
include the following: 
1. the violation was necessary to (a) allow an emergency vehicle to 
pass or (b) avoid injuring a person or property, 
2. the violation occurred during a time that the vehicle was 
reported stolen to law enforcement and had not yet been 
recovered, 
3. the person was not operating the vehicle at the time, and  
4. the violation was necessary for the driver to comply with 
another law concerning vehicle operation.  
In the case of speed cameras in school and hospital zones, the bill 
also specifically makes available the defense that the person was 
convicted of traveling unreasonably fast (CGS § 14-218a) or speeding 
(CGS § 14-219) for the same incident based upon a separate and 
distinct citation issued by an officer.  
Speed Camera Violations and Fine Revenue Distribution (§§ 5, 22 
& 23) 
The bill creates a specific violation for speeding captured by speed 
cameras. Specifically, it prohibits people operating motor vehicles,  2021HB-05429-R000083-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: HP 	Page 13 	3/18/21 
 
other than emergency vehicles, from exceeding the posted speed limit 
by 11 mph or more, as detected by a speed camera, in a maintenance 
work, school, or hospital zone.  
 The violation is separate from other speed-related violations under 
the law, and the bill specifically prohibits prosecution for a speed 
camera violation and the other speed -related violations or 
endangerment of a highway worker because of the same offense.  
The bill establishes a fine for speed camera violations of (1) $75 for a 
first offense and (2) $90 for a subsequent offense. The fines are not 
subject to any additional surcharges.  
Under the bill, the state must remit all fine revenue collected from 
speed camera violations in schools and hospital zones, less $10 per 
ticket, to the municipalities in which the violations occurred. The 
municipalities must use the revenue to improve traffic safety within 
the town. The $10 from each ticket must be deposited into a DOT-
controlled account and used to fund its required public awareness 
campaign (see below). The bill does not specify where revenue from 
speed camera violations in maintenance work zones must be 
deposited, but presumably it must be deposited in the General Fund. 
Under existing law, fines from speed-related violations (CGS §§ 14-
218a, -219 & -222) are deposited into the Special Transportation Fund 
(STF)(CGS §§ 13b-59 & -61(b)(4)). It is unclear whether the bill has 
implications for the STF “lockbox” (see BACKGROUND) because it 
does not deposit speed camera violation revenue into the STF.  
The bill requires each clerk of the Superior Court or the Chief Court 
Administrator, or any other Superior Court official designated by the 
Chief Court Administrator, to certify to the comptroller, by the 30
th
 day 
of each January, April, July, and October, the amount due for the 
previous quarter to each municipality serviced by the office of the clerk 
or official. 
Image and Data Privacy and Security (§§ 15(b)(3), 16, 21(b)(5) & 
21(g)) 
Image Recording. Under the bill, speed cameras must be installed  2021HB-05429-R000083-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: HP 	Page 14 	3/18/21 
 
so that they only record images of a vehicle’s license plate and not of 
the vehicle’s occupants or any other people or vehicles in the vicinity 
when the images are recorded. 
DOT Regulations. Before speed cameras may be operated in a 
maintenance work zone, school zone, or hospital zone, DOT must 
adopt regulations regarding the privacy, security, collection, use, and 
disclosure of recorded images and any other data produced by speed 
cameras. The regulations must include: 
1. procedures to ensure recorded images’ privacy and security; 
2. a description of any other data produced by a speed camera and 
collected by DOT, a municipality, or a contractor; and 
3. provisions to appropriately limit access to the images and data. 
Image Disclosure. The bill prohibits DOT, a municipality, or a 
contractor from disclosing any speed camera images or data to any 
person except where the disclosure is made (1) between DOT, a 
municipality, the police, or a contractor in order to operate the cameras 
or issue a ticket; (2) pursuant to judicial orders (e.g., a search warrant 
or subpoena) in criminal proceedings; or (3) to comply with state or 
federal law. DOT, a municipality, or a contractor may also disclose 
aggregate information and data collected from speed cameras for 
DOT-approved research purposes as long as the data does not directly 
or indirectly identify vehicles. 
Within 30 days after disclosing images or data pursuant to a judicial 
order, DOT, the municipality, or its contractor must notify the subject 
person that it made the disclosure. They are not required to send the 
notice by mail if the United States Postal Service has determined that 
mail is undeliverable to the person at the address they have for the 
person.  
Under the bill, speed camera images or data are not deemed a 
public record for purposes of the Freedom of Information Act. 
Image Destruction. Under the bill, images and data recorded by  2021HB-05429-R000083-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: HP 	Page 15 	3/18/21 
 
speed cameras must be destroyed (1) 60 days after the alleged 
violation’s date, if a citation is not issued, or (2) upon the case’s final 
disposition, if a citation is issued.  
Audit. The bill requires DOT and participating municipalities, or 
their contractors, to conduct internal audits regarding compliance with 
the privacy regulations DOT adopts. In the case of maintenance work 
zone cameras, the audit must be completed annually starting one year 
after a speed camera begins operating in a maintenance work zone. In 
the case of the pilot program, the audit must be conducted one year 
after a speed camera begins operating and in each year of the pilot 
program. 
Annual Reporting. Beginning one year after a speed camera 
becomes operational in a maintenance work zone, school zone or 
hospital zone, DOT or a participating municipality must annually 
submit a report containing the following information:  
1. the number of times speed cameras captured license plates; 
2. the number of times DOT, a municipality, or a contractor, as 
applicable, disclosed speed camera images or data pursuant to a 
criminal search warrant or criminal subpoena; 
3. the number of requests for images or data DOT, a municipality, 
or a contractor received, including the requestor’s identity and a 
copy of the request; and  
4. the results of the internal audit the bill requires. 
DOT must submit the report to the Transportation Committee. 
Municipalities participating in the pilot program must submit their 
reports to OPM, and then OPM must compile them into a consolidated 
report with any recommendations about the pilot program to the 
Transportation Committee. The bill does not specify a deadline by 
which OPM must submit the report.  
Public Safety Awareness Campaigns (§§ 17 & 21(b)(3))  2021HB-05429-R000083-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: HP 	Page 16 	3/18/21 
 
The bill requires DOT, after consulting with pedestrian safety 
advocates, to develop and implement a public awareness campaign to 
educate the public about (1) ways to reduce transportation-related 
fatalities and severe injuries to pedestrians, bicyclists, transit users, 
motorists, and passengers; (2) the importance of obeying speed limits 
in highway work zones, school zones, and hospital zones; and (3) the 
possible use of speed cameras in maintenance work zones. A 
“highway work zone” is an area of a state highway where 
construction, maintenance, or utility work is being performed.  
It also requires municipalities participating in the pilot program, at 
least 30 days before a speed camera is installed and operational, to 
develop and implement a public awareness campaign about (1) the 
importance of obeying speed limits in school and hospital zones and 
(2) the use of speed cameras in the zone. It is unclear whether a 
municipality must conduct this campaign each time it installs a camera 
or just for the first one. 
§ 18 — WORK ZONE SAFETY ACC OUNT 
Requires that money in the work zone safety account be used only to pay costs of state 
police traffic enforcement in highway work zones 
By law, the work zone safety account is a separate, nonlapsing 
account within the Special Transportation Fund. Under current law, 
money in the account must be spent by DOT to protect the safety of 
highway workers in highway work zones through (1) highway traffic 
enforcement, including the expansion of the “Operation Big Orange” 
program, and (2) purchasing and implementing technology and 
equipment. Any money used for purposes other than the Operation 
Big Orange program or direct traffic enforcement in work zones must 
be approved by the Highway Work Zone Safety Advisory Council (see 
BACKGROUND). 
Under the bill, money in the account must instead be used only to 
pay the costs of traffic enforcement and control by state police in 
highway work zones.  
EFFECTIVE DATE:  January 1, 2022  2021HB-05429-R000083-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: HP 	Page 17 	3/18/21 
 
§ 20 — HOSPITAL ZONES 
Allows LTAs to establish hospital zones on roads adjacent or sufficiently close to hospital 
property  
The bill allows LTAs and OSTA to (1) designate as a hospital zone 
any local road or state highway, as applicable, that is adjacent to 
hospital property or sufficiently close to hospital property to 
constitute, in the LTA’s opinion, a risk to public safety under all the 
circumstances and (2) revoke such designation. In the case of state 
roads, OSTA may only designate and revoke a zone at the request of a 
municipality’s legislative body.  
The LTA or OSTA, as applicable, must post an OSTA-approved sign 
at the beginning and end of the zone, in each direction that traffic is 
permitted to flow, indicating the zone’s designation. The sign must 
conform to the MUTCD.  
BACKGROUND 
Highway Worker  
By law, a “highway worker” is a person who is required to perform 
his or her job duties on state bridges, state roads, or in highway work 
zones, including:  
1. a person performing maintenance, repair, or construction of 
state bridges, state roads, shoulders, medians, and associated 
rights-of-way in highway work zones;  
2. a person operating a truck, loader, or other equipment or 
performing any other related maintenance on state bridges, 
state roads, or in highway work zones;  
3. a state or local public safety officer enforcing work zone-related 
transportation management and traffic control;  
4. a state or local public safety officer conducting traffic control or 
enforcement operations on state bridges, state roads, shoulders, 
medians, and associated rights-of-way; and  
5. a state or local public safety officer or firefighter, an emergency 
medical services provider, or any other authorized person (a)  2021HB-05429-R000083-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: HP 	Page 18 	3/18/21 
 
removing hazards on state bridges, state roads, shoulders, 
medians, or associated rights-of-way or (b) responding to 
accidents and other incidents in such locations or in highway 
work zones (CGS § 14-212d). 
Centralized Infractions Bureau (CIB) 
By law, individuals charged with a motor vehicle violation may, 
generally, pay the fine through the CIB without appearing in court. 
Payment is considered a plea of nolo contendere (no contest) and is not 
admissible in any civil or criminal proceeding. If an individual pleads 
not guilty, the CIB must send the plea and request for trial to the clerk 
of the geographical area court where the trial is to take place. The 
practice, procedure, rules of evidence, and burden of proof applicable 
in criminal proceedings apply in such a trial (CGS § 51-164n). 
Special Transportation Fund and the “Lockbox”  
The STF is a dedicated fund used to finance the state’s 
transportation infrastructure program and operate DOT and DMV 
(CGS § 13b-68). The law requires specified tax revenue (e.g., fuel taxes 
and a portion of sales and use tax revenue) and various transportation-
related fees, fines, and charges to be credited to the STF.  
Both the state constitution and the general statutes contain a 
“lockbox” provision, which preserves the STF as a perpetual fund, 
requires that it be used exclusively for transportation purposes, 
including paying transportation-related debt, and requires that any 
funding sources directed to the STF by law continue to be directed 
there, as long as the law authorizes the state to collect or receive them 
(Conn. Const., art. III, § 19; CGS § 13b-68(b)). 
Highway Work Zone Safety Advisory Council 
The six-member council is made up of the DOT, DMV, and 
emergency services and public protection commissioners, or their 
designees; the presidents of Connecticut Employees Union 
Independent and the state police union, or their designees; and a 
representative of Connecticut Construction Industries Association. The 
council is charged with making ongoing recommendations to improve  2021HB-05429-R000083-BA.docx 
 
Researcher: HP 	Page 19 	3/18/21 
 
safety for workers, public safety officers, and drivers in highway work 
zones (CGS § 14-212e). 
COMMITTEE ACTION 
Transportation Committee 
Joint Favorable Substitute 
Yea 34 Nay 0 (03/03/2021)