Connecticut House Bill HB05559

Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/26/21
• Refer: 1/26/21

Caption

An Act Concerning Assault Of Loss Prevention Agents.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would modify Section 53a-167c of the general statutes in the state, thereby increasing the legal repercussions for those who assault loss prevention agents. This change is anticipated to deter potential assaults against these individuals during their work hours. Proponents of the bill argue that it will empower loss prevention workers by offering them better protection and encourage them to perform their duties without the fear of higher risks involved in confronting offenders. The overall expectation is that this would improve workplace safety in retail and other environments where loss prevention is critical.

Summary

House Bill 05559 aims to enhance the protection of loss prevention agents by amending the state law concerning assault crimes. The bill proposes to categorize loss prevention agents as victims of assault who are entitled to elevated penalties if assaulted while performing their duties. This legislative change seeks to recognize the risks that loss prevention personnel face on the job and to promote a safer working environment. The inclusion of loss prevention agents in this category signifies the recognition of their role in maintaining security and preventing theft in retail settings.

Contention

While there is a general support for improving safety for workers, the bill may face some contention regarding the implications of elevating penalties specifically for loss prevention agents. Critics might argue that the focus on one specific role could lead to disparities in protection among other roles within the workplace. The bill's efficacy in actually deterring violence or assaults is also a point of debate, with some lawmakers questioning whether increased penalties alone are sufficient to change behavior. Thus, while the bill aims to provide recognition and support for loss prevention personnel, discussions surrounding its broader implications may continue.