Connecticut 2021 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05598 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 04/15/2021

                     
Researcher: JO 	Page 1 	4/15/21 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
HB 5598  
 
AN ACT CONCERNING A PROPERTY OWNER'S LIABILITY FOR 
THE EXPENSES OF REMOVING A FALLEN TREE OR LIMB.  
 
SUMMARY 
This bill establishes conditions under which a private real property 
owner (“land owner”) is presumed liable for the expenses of removing 
a tree or tree limb that fell from his or her property onto an adjoining 
private owner’s land.  
It generally makes the land owner liable if he or she failed to act 
within 90 days after the adjoining owner notified him or her that, 
based on an arborist’s inspection, a tree or limb on the property was 
likely to fall within five years. The bill specifies how the presumption 
may be rebutted.   
Among other things, it also (1) exempts certain property from its 
provisions and (2) allows an insurance company, when paying for a 
related claim, to deduct any amount the adjoining land owner recovers 
under the bill. 
EFFECTIVE DATE:  October 1, 2021 
LIABILITY FOR FALLEN TREES 
Presumption of Liability  
Under the bill, a private land owner is presumed liable for the 
expenses of removing a tree or tree limb that fell from his or her 
property onto an adjoining private owner’s land if, before the tree or 
limb fell:  
1. a licensed arborist inspected the tree and documented that the 
tree or limb was diseased, decayed, or damaged and likely to 
fall within five years of the inspection date;  2021HB-05598-R000466-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JO 	Page 2 	4/15/21 
 
2. the adjoining private property owner notified the land owner of 
this determination and requested that the land owner cure the 
condition by any appropriate method (including removing, 
pruning, or spraying the tree); and 
3. the land owner failed to do so within 90 days after receiving this 
notice. 
The notice must be in writing and sent by certified mail, return 
receipt requested. The bill specifies that this notice is deemed personal 
to the owner who provided it and does not run with the land (i.e., the 
presumption of liability would not apply if the owner providing the 
notice sold the property before the tree fell, unless the new owner 
provided his or her own notice). 
Rebutting the Presumption 
The bill’s presumption of liability may be rebutted if the land owner 
shows that: 
1. after he or she received the notice, an arborist inspected the tree 
or limb and documented that it was not diseased, decayed, or 
damaged and likely to fall or 
2. the tree or limb fell due to a reason other than the condition 
described in the notice, including a motor vehicle collision, fire, 
lightning, or other act of God. 
Private Real Property 
The bill’s provisions apply only to trees on “private real property” 
that fall onto other such private property. Under the bill, “private real 
property” does not include:  
1. property owned by a political subdivision of the state, a water 
company, or a tax-exempt nonprofit organization;  
2. property subject to a conservation easement held by a tax-
exempt nonprofit organization;  
3. timber land of more than 10 years’ growth; or  2021HB-05598-R000466-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JO 	Page 3 	4/15/21 
 
4. farm land, forest land, or open space land eligible for the “PA 
490 program” (which allows this land to be assessed for 
property tax purposes based on its current use value rather than 
its full market value). 
Arborist Access and Impact on the Presumption  
The bill provides that: 
1. land owners are not required to allow access to their property 
for an arborist’s inspection and 
2. if an arborist is unable to access the property, this does not 
waive the requirement for the arborist’s determination as 
described above to establish the presumption.   
Insurance and Other Remedies 
The bill allows an insurance company to deduct from a payment 
under a liability policy the amount the policyholder recovers under the 
bill, to the extent that amount would be a covered loss under the 
policy. It does not otherwise affect a policyholder’s rights under a 
liability policy.  
The bill specifies that it does not limit anyone’s right to pursue other 
civil remedies as allowed by law. 
COMMITTEE ACTION 
Judiciary Committee 
Joint Favorable 
Yea 34 Nay 3 (03/29/2021)