Connecticut 2021 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05598 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 05/27/2021

                     
Researcher: JO 	Page 1 	5/27/21 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
HB 5598 (as amended by House "A")*  
 
AN ACT CONCERNING A PROPERTY OWNER'S LIABILITY FOR 
THE EXPENSES OF REMOVING A FALLEN TREE OR LIMB.  
 
SUMMARY 
This bill establishes conditions under which a private real property 
owner (“land owner”) is presumed liable for the expenses of removing 
a tree or tree limb that fell from his or her property onto an adjoining 
private owner’s land.  
It generally makes the land owner liable if he or she failed to act 
within 90 days after the adjoining owner notified him or her that, 
based on an arborist’s inspection, a tree or limb on the property was 
likely to fall within five years. The bill specifies how the presumption 
may be rebutted.   
Among other things, it also (1) exempts certain property from its 
provisions and (2) allows an insurance company, when paying for a 
related claim, to deduct any amount the adjoining land owner recovers 
under the bill. 
*House Amendment “A” clarifies that the bill does not apply to 
state-owned property.  
EFFECTIVE DATE:  October 1, 2021 
LIABILITY FOR FALLEN TREES 
Presumption of Liability  
Under the bill, a private land owner is presumed liable for the 
expenses of removing a tree or tree limb that fell from his or her 
property onto an adjoining private owner’s land if, before the tree or 
limb fell:  
1. a licensed arborist inspected the tree and documented that the  2021HB-05598-R010746-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JO 	Page 2 	5/27/21 
 
tree or limb was diseased, decayed, or damaged and likely to 
fall within five years of the inspection date; 
2. the adjoining private property owner notified the land owner of 
this determination and requested that the land owner cure the 
condition by any appropriate method (including removing, 
pruning, or spraying the tree); and 
3. the land owner failed to do so within 90 days after receiving this 
notice. 
The notice must be in writing and sent by certified mail, return 
receipt requested. The bill specifies that this notice is deemed personal 
to the owner who provided it and does not run with the land (i.e., the 
presumption of liability would not apply if the owner providing the 
notice sold the property before the tree fell, unless the new owner 
provided his or her own notice). 
Rebutting the Presumption 
The bill’s presumption of liability may be rebutted if the land owner 
shows that: 
1. after he or she received the notice, an arborist inspected the tree 
or limb and documented that it was not diseased, decayed, or 
damaged and likely to fall or 
2. the tree or limb fell due to a reason other than the condition 
described in the notice, including a motor vehicle collision, fire, 
lightning, or other act of God. 
Private Real Property 
The bill’s provisions apply only to trees on “private real property” 
that fall onto other private real property. Under the bill, this property 
does not include:  
1. real property owned by the state, a political subdivision of the 
state, a water company, or a tax-exempt nonprofit organization;  
2. real property subject to a conservation easement held by a tax- 2021HB-05598-R010746-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JO 	Page 3 	5/27/21 
 
exempt nonprofit organization;  
3. timber land of more than 10 years’ growth; or 
4. farm, forest, or open space land eligible for the “PA 490 
program” (which allows this land to be assessed for property 
tax purposes based on its current use value rather than its full 
market value). 
Arborist Access and Impact on the Presumption  
The bill provides that: 
1. land owners are not required to allow access to their property 
for an arborist’s inspection and 
2. if an arborist is unable to access the property, this does not 
waive the requirement for the arborist’s determination as 
described above to establish the presumption.   
Insurance and Other Remedies 
The bill allows an insurance company to deduct from a payment 
under a liability policy the amount the policyholder recovers under the 
bill, to the extent that amount would be a covered loss under the 
policy. It does not otherwise affect a policyholder’s rights under a 
liability policy.  
The bill specifies that it does not limit anyone’s right to pursue other 
civil remedies as allowed by law. 
COMMITTEE ACTION 
Judiciary Committee 
Joint Favorable 
Yea 34 Nay 3 (03/29/2021)