Connecticut House Bill HB06080

Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/28/21
• Refer: 1/28/21

Caption

An Act Studying And Participating In Pilot Programs Regarding A Mileage-based User Fee On Motor Vehicles.

Impact

The potential impact of HB 6080 on state laws includes the repeal of section 13b-14b of the general statutes, which could alter the legislative landscape governing funding mechanisms for transportation. By allowing the study of a mileage-based user fee, the state could pave the way for a more sustainable and equitable method of funding transportation infrastructure. Supporters argue that this new system would ensure that those who use the roads the most contribute fairly to their maintenance and improvement, while potentially reducing the reliance on fluctuating fuel tax revenues, which can be adversely affected by shifting consumer behaviors and fuel efficiency standards.

Summary

House Bill 6080 aims to address the funding of transportation infrastructure by permitting the Department of Transportation to study and participate in federal pilot programs focused on implementing a mileage-based user fee for motor vehicles traveling on state highways. This proposed bill seeks to explore alternative revenue sources for transportation that could alleviate the financial burden placed on traditional funding mechanisms such as fuel taxes. The introduction of a mileage-based user fee could represent a significant shift in how transportation systems are financially supported in the state, aligning more closely with road usage.

Contention

Despite its intentions, HB 6080 may face contention from various stakeholders. Concerns may arise around privacy issues related to tracking vehicle mileage, equity implications regarding fees imposed on low-income drivers or those who depend heavily on their vehicles, and the logistical challenges involved in implementing such a system. Critics might also question whether transitioning to a mileage-based user fee is the best solution for addressing the transportation funding crisis, urging instead for a reevaluation of existing funding sources or enhanced efficiencies within the Department of Transportation.