Connecticut 2021 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06193 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 04/19/2021

                     
Researcher: TA 	Page 1 	4/19/21 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
sHB 6193  
 
AN ACT SUBJECTING CERTAIN NONSTATE ENTITIES THAT 
SERVE A GOVERNMENTAL FUNCTION TO THE FREEDOM OF 
INFORMATION ACT AND THE CODES OF ETHICS.  
 
SUMMARY 
This bill subjects certain (1) entities that serve a governmental 
function, as defined by the bill, to the Freedom of Information Act 
(FOIA) and (2) individuals appointed to these entities to the state Code 
of Ethics for Public Officials.  
Under the bill, an entity serves a governmental function if, (1) with 
certain exceptions, any of its members are "public officials" under the 
state Code of Ethics for Public Officials; (2) it is authorized to spend 
public funds; or (3) it receives public funds as part of its operations. 
EFFECTIVE DATE:  October 1, 2021 
GOVERNMENTAL FUNCTIO N 
Under the bill, an entity serves a governmental function if it meets 
one of the three criteria outlined above. With respect to the first 
criterion, an entity serves a governmental function if its board of 
directors or corporate governance includes any of the following 
members: 
1. a statewide elected officer or member or member-elect of the 
legislature, 
2. a person appointed to any office in any branch of state 
government by the governor or one of his appointees, 
3. a public member or representative of the teachers' unions or 
state employees' unions appointed to the Investment Advisory 
Council,  2021HB-06193-R000497-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: TA 	Page 2 	4/19/21 
 
4. a quasi-public agency member or director, or 
5. the governor's spouse. 
These individuals (other than judges and members of advisory 
boards) are all "public officials" under the Code of Ethics for Public 
Officials (see below). (Presumably, they must serve on the entity's 
board in their official capacity to trigger the bill's requirements.) 
CODE OF ETHICS 
By law, the Code of Ethics for Public Officials applies to state 
employees and specified public officials. Among other things, the code 
prohibits covered individuals from having any financial interest in a 
business that is in substantial conflict with their official duties (CGS § 
1-84(a)). 
Under existing law, "public officials" includes each of the 
individuals listed above (other than judges and members of advisory 
boards), plus any person appointed or elected by the legislature or a 
member of either house. The bill additionally classifies as "public 
officials" certain members of entities that are not state agencies or 
quasi-public agencies but that serve a governmental function as 
defined in the bill. Specifically, it applies to members of these entities' 
boards who are appointed by the governor or one of his appointees, a 
statewide officer, or a legislator. 
FOIA 
Among other things, FOIA requires state and municipal public 
agencies and quasi-public agencies, with limited exceptions, to (1) 
make their records and files available to the public for inspection and 
copying; (2) post their meeting agendas and minutes; and (3) allow the 
public to attend their meetings (CGS §§ 1-210 & 1-225). 
Under current law, FOIA applies to non-public entities to the extent 
they are deemed to be the functional equivalent of a public agency 
(CGS § 1-200(1)(B)). To determine whether a person is the “functional 
equivalent” of a public agency, courts and the Freedom of Information 
Commission (FOIC) apply a four-part test established by the  2021HB-06193-R000497-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: TA 	Page 3 	4/19/21 
 
Connecticut Supreme Court in Board of Trustees of Woodstock Academy v. 
FOI Commission, 181 Conn. 544 (1980). One component of this test is 
whether the entity performs a governmental function (see 
BACKGROUND). 
The bill expands FOIA's definition of public agency to include non-
public entities that perform a governmental function, as defined by the 
bill (see above). (The bill's definition of "governmental function" is 
broader than the definition used by courts and FOIC for the functional 
equivalent test (see BACKGROUND).) 
The bill additionally classifies, as the "functional equivalent" of a 
public agency, the same entity board members whom it defines as 
"public officials" under the Code of Ethics for Public Officials (see 
above). Specifically, it applies to members (1) appointed by the 
governor or one of his appointees, a statewide officer, or a legislator 
and (2) serving on entities that are not state agencies or quasi-public 
agencies but that serve a governmental function as defined in the bill. 
(The legal effect of this provision is unclear.) 
BACKGROUND 
Functional Equivalent Test 
FOIA's functional equivalent test consists of the following factors: 
1. whether the entity performs a governmental function, 
2. the level of government funding, 
3. the extent of government involvement or regulation, and 
4. whether the entity was created by government (Woodstock, 
supra). 
When it established the test, the Connecticut Supreme Court stated 
that these criteria should be applied on a case-by-case basis. In a later 
case, the court held that an entity need not meet all four criteria in 
order to be held to be a functional equivalent. Rather, “[a]ll relevant 
factors are to be considered cumulatively, with no single factor being  2021HB-06193-R000497-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: TA 	Page 4 	4/19/21 
 
essential or conclusive” (Connecticut Humane Society v. FOI Commission, 
218 Conn. 757, 761 (1991)). 
Governmental Function: Common Law 
In applying the functional equivalent test in a 1998 case, the 
Appellate Court held that “Performing a government service pursuant 
to contract does not make an entity a public agency subject to 
[FOIA]…. The key to determining whether an entity is a government 
agency or merely a contractor with the government is whether the 
government is really involved in the core of the program" (Domestic 
Violence Services of Greater New Haven, Inc. v. Freedom of Information 
Commission, 47 Conn. App. 466 (1998)). 
Governmental Function: Statutory Requirement 
Separate from the functional equivalent test, FOIA also requires that 
each contract exceeding $2.5 million between a public agency and a 
person for the performance of a governmental function provide that 
the public agency is entitled to receive a copy of records and files 
related to the performance of the governmental function (CGS § 1-218). 
For purposes of this requirement, "governmental function" 
generally includes a public agency program's administration or 
management by a person that, among other things, participates in 
formulating governmental policies or decisions connected to the 
program's administration or management. It does not include the mere 
provision of goods or services to a public agency without delegated 
program management or administration responsibilities (CGS § 1-
200(11)). 
COMMITTEE ACTION 
Government Administration and Elections Committee 
Joint Favorable Substitute 
Yea 18 Nay 1 (03/31/2021)