Connecticut 2021 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06443 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 05/10/2021

                    OFFICE OF FISCAL ANALYSIS 
Legislative Office Building, Room 5200 
Hartford, CT 06106  (860) 240-0200 
http://www.cga.ct.gov/ofa 
sHB-6443 
AN ACT CONCERNING REVENUE ITEMS TO IMPLEMENT THE 
BIENNIAL BUDGET.  
 
Primary Analyst: MM 	5/10/21 
Contributing Analyst(s): WL, PM, CW, EW   
 
 
 
OFA Fiscal Note 
 
State Impact: 
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 22 $ FY 23 $ 
Various 	Various - See 
Below 
See Below See Below 
Note: Various=Various  
Municipal Impact: 
Municipalities 	Effect FY 22 $ FY 23 $ 
All Municipalities STATE MANDATE
1
 - 
See Below 
See Below See Below 
  
Explanation 
The bill makes changes to state tax and revenue policies and 
establishes the "Connecticut Equitable Investment Fund." Summary 
and detailed table of changes are provided below, along with 
additional information and estimates for certain aspects of the bill. 
 
                                                
1
 State mandate is defined in Sec. 2-32b(2) of the Connecticut General Statutes, "state 
mandate" means any state initiated constitutional, statutory or executive action that 
requires a local government to establish, expand or modify its activities in such a 
way as to necessitate additional expenditures from local revenues.  2021HB-06443-R000638-FN.DOCX 	Page 2 of 5 
 
 
 
  2021HB-06443-R000638-FN.DOCX 	Page 3 of 5 
 
 
 
Sections 1 & 2 effectively allow certain employees or contractors to 
shift their state income tax burden to employers, beginning in calendar 
year 2022.  It is unknown to what extent employers would adjust 
future compensation levels in response to any such shift.  The potential 
for employers to adjust future compensation levels would be limited 
by collective bargaining agreements and competition within some 
industries/job categories.  Most state and municipal employees are 
compensated according to collective bargaining agreements.  To the 
extent these employees choose to participate in the program there 
would be a cost equal to 5% of wages paid to the state and  2021HB-06443-R000638-FN.DOCX 	Page 4 of 5 
 
 
municipalities.  For illustrative purposes, the state and local payroll for 
unionized employees is approximately $4 billion and $8.6 billion, 
respectively.  If all these employees participated in the program, there 
would be a cost of $200 million and $430 million to the state and 
municipalities, respectively. 
The bill designates any revenue collected under the Voluntary Wage 
Compensation Tax to the newly established Equitable Investment 
Fund, with the General Fund absorbing the negative revenue impact of 
resulting credits against the state income tax.
2
 The preliminary fiscal 
note on the bill reflected a $50 million revenue target in FY 23 to the 
Equitable Investment Fund due to the new Voluntary Wage 
Compensation Tax, which (if achieved) would reduce General Fund 
revenue by an approximately equivalent amount. 
There is a potential net revenue loss and a potential net revenue 
gain to the two funds depending on the behavior of taxpayers who 
choose to take part in the program.  The potential revenue loss is from 
participants whose income is reduced or who forgo an increase in 
income as a result of the program.
3
  The potential revenue gain is from 
participants who are able to keep their income relatively flat or 
maintain scheduled increases.
4
 
Section 6 expands the existing estate tax reduction for decedents 
that made qualifying investments during their lifetimes.  This could 
result in a significant, future state revenue loss to the extent that 
participation in the new program reduces tax liabilities under the 
estate tax. 
                                                
2
 Under the bill, participating employees and contractors would continue to be 
subject to the state income tax but with a credit equal to 95% of the new Voluntary 
Wage Compensation Tax paid by their employer.    
3
 The revenue loss is relatively small per participant, typically less than $100 per tax 
filer.   
4
 The potential revenue gain is a result of the state benefiting from providing a credit 
for payroll taxes paid of 95% (rather than 100%) which is worth .0025% of a 
participant’s income.  For an average tax payer making $75,000 the benefit would be 
approximately $188 per tax filer.  2021HB-06443-R000638-FN.DOCX 	Page 5 of 5 
 
 
Section 13 establishes the Connecticut Equitable Investment Fund 
(CEIF) as a permanent investment fund to receive, invest, and 
distribute specified tax revenue, including revenue from new taxes 
established in the bill (consumption tax, voluntary wage compensation 
tax, digital advertising services tax) as well as revenues potentially 
generated via other bills authorizing adult-use cannabis and online 
gaming. Under Section 5 of the bill, the state Earned Income Tax 
Credit (EITC) is to be funded through the CEIF at a rate equal to 40% 
of the federal EITC level. 
Costs to implement the tax provisions of the bill are estimated to 
total approximately $2.5 million in FY 22 and $1.9 million in FY 23.  
This includes $768,722 in FY 22 and $1.4 million in FY 23 in salary and 
fringe benefits costs for Revenue Agents, Revenue Examiners, and a 
Tax Appellate Officer, as well as one-time costs totaling $1.7 million in 
FY 22 and $500,000 in FY 23 for new tax type programming and 
information technology costs, after which the only ongoing costs 
would be for personnel. The annualized ongoing fiscal impact 
identified above would continue into the future subject to inflation.  
The Out Years 
Outyear impacts identified above.