Connecticut 2021 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06450 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 04/01/2021

                     
Researcher: ND 	Page 1 	4/1/21 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
HB 6450  
 
AN ACT IMPLEMENTING THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET 
RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING PUBLIC HEALTH.  
 
SUMMARY 
Starting January 1, 2022, this bill prohibits e-cigarette dealers from 
selling, delivering, giving, or possessing with the intent to sell, e-
cigarettes and vapor products with (1) a nicotine content great than 35 
milligrams per milliliter (mg/ml) or (2) a flavoring agent other than 
tobacco. It excludes from the flavor ban “modified risk tobacco 
products” designated by the U.S. Department of Health and Human 
Services (see BACKGROUND).  
Additionally, the bill: 
1. requires e-cigarette manufacturers to provide documentation to 
e-cigarette dealers on the nicotine content of their products and 
requires dealers to maintain the documentation (§ 2); 
2. requires the Department of Mental Health and Addiction 
Services (DMHAS) to conduct unannounced compliance checks 
on e-cigarette dealers and refer non-compliant dealers to the 
Department of Revenue Services (DRS) commissioner who may 
impose civil penalties (§ 3); 
3.  increases the penalties for sales of cigarettes, tobacco products, 
e-cigarettes, and vapor products to individuals under age 21 
and extends the same increased penalties to e-cigarette dealers 
who violate the bill’s flavor ban and nicotine content 
requirements (§§ 3-6); 
4. increases the penalties on owners of establishments with 
cigarette vending machines and restricted cigarette vending 
machines for sales to individuals under the legal age (§ 4);  2021HB-06450-R000237-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: ND 	Page 2 	4/1/21 
 
5. allows the state’s health insurance exchange to (a) impose 
assessments on health carriers to cover the costs of the all-payer 
claims database (APCD) and (b) with the Office of Policy and 
Management’s (OPM) approval, enter into an agreement with 
the Office of Health Strategy (OHS) to use these funds for the 
APCD (§ 7); and  
6. requires the amount annually appropriated from the Insurance 
Fund to OHS, including the cost of fringe benefits for personnel, 
to be reduced by the amount of Medicaid reimbursement the 
state received for allowable administrative expenses (§ 8).  
Lastly, the bill makes technical and conforming changes.  
EFFECTIVE DATE:  January 1, 2022 
§§ 1-3 & 6 — E-CIGARETTES AND VAPOR PRODUCTS 
Definition of Flavoring 
Under the bill, flavored e-cigarettes and vapor products are those 
with a flavoring agent that has been added for the purpose of flavoring 
these products. It defines a “flavoring agent” as an additive: 
1. used in accordance with good manufacturing practice principles 
and in the minimum quantity required to produce its intended 
effect; 
2. (a) consisting of one or more ingredients generally recognized 
as safe in food or drugs, (b) has been previously sanctioned for 
such use by the state or federal government, (c) meets U.S. 
Pharmacopeia standards, or (d) is an additive permitted for 
direct addition to food for human consumption under FDA 
regulations; 
3. that is inert and produces no effect other than the instillation or 
modification of flavor; and 
4. is no greater than 5% of the product’s total weight.  
  2021HB-06450-R000237-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: ND 	Page 3 	4/1/21 
 
Nicotine Content 
The bill prohibits e-cigarette dealers from selling e-cigarettes or 
vapor products with a nicotine content greater than 35 mg/ml. It 
requires e-cigarette manufacturers to provide documentation to 
dealers on the nicotine content of these products (expressed as mg/ml) 
that the manufacturers sell to them.  
Under the bill, dealers must maintain this documentation at their 
registered place of business for each product sold, delivered, or given 
to them by a manufacturer. They must also provide the documentation 
to DMHAS upon request, during any unannounced compliance check 
the department conducts.  
Compliance Checks 
The bill requires the DMHAS commissioner, or her designee, to 
conduct unannounced compliance checks on e-cigarette dealers to 
determine whether they are complying with the bill’s flavor ban and 
nicotine content requirements. Existing law already requires DMHAS 
to conduct these checks for underage sales (i.e., sales to individuals 
under age 21). 
Under the bill, the department must refer e-cigarette dealers to the 
DRS commissioner after the initial compliance check who (1) do not 
produce documentation on the nicotine content of their products or (2) 
sell products that violate the nicotine threshold. In the case of the 
flavor ban, the department must refer non-compliant dealers to DRS 
after completing an unannounced follow-up compliance check. The 
DRS may impose a penalty (see Table 1 below).  
§§ 3-6 — PENALTIES FOR UNDERAGE SALES 
Existing law allows the DRS commissioner, after a hearing, to 
impose civil penalties on e-cigarette dealers, cigarette dealers and 
distributors, or their employees for sales to individuals under age 21. 
The bill increases these penalties as shown in the table below and 
extends the same penalties to e-cigarette dealers who violate the bill’s 
flavor ban and nicotine content requirements.  2021HB-06450-R000237-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: ND 	Page 4 	4/1/21 
 
Table 1: Civil Penalties for Underage Sales 
 Current Law Under the Bill 
Penalties on Cigarette Dealers and Distributors and E-Cigarette Dealers 
1
st
 violation $300, if they fail to complete an 
online tobacco prevention 
education program within 30 
days 
$600, if they fail to complete an 
online tobacco prevention 
education program within 30 
days 
2
nd
 violation  $750   	$1,500  
3
rd
 violation $1,000, plus minimum 30-day 
license suspension  
$2,000, plus minimum 30-day 
license suspension 
4
th
 violation $1,000, plus license revocation  $2,000, plus license revocation 
Penalties on Their Employees  
1
st
 violation $200, if the employee fails to 
complete an online tobacco 
education program within 30 
days 
$400, if the employee fails to 
complete an online tobacco 
education program within 30 
days 
2
nd
 violation $250  	$500  
 
As under current law, the above fines for second and subsequent 
violations may be imposed for violations that occur within 24 months 
after the first violation. 
Under the bill, as under current law, the DRS commissioner may 
only impose the above fines on e-cigarette dealers (or their employees) 
who violate the bill’s flavor ban and nicotine threshold if they are 
referred to him by the DMHAS commissioner after completing 
unannounced compliance checks (see above). For third and fourth 
violations, the DRS commissioner must direct the Department of 
Consumer Protection (DCP) commissioner to suspend or revoke the e-
cigarette dealer’s registration.  
Before taking such action, existing law requires the DRS 
commissioner to notify the e-cigarette dealer in writing of the hearing 
time and location and require the dealer to show cause why the 
registration should not be suspended or revoked. The notice must be 
delivered personally, or by registered or certified mail at least 10 days 
before the hearing date. When the DRS commissioner directs the DCP  2021HB-06450-R000237-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: ND 	Page 5 	4/1/21 
 
commissioner to suspend or revoke the dealer’s registration, the DCP 
commissioner is not required to hold an additional hearing before 
doing so. 
§ 4 — VENDING MACHINE SALE S  
Current law allows the DRS commissioner, after a hearing, to 
impose penalties on owners of establishments with cigarette vending 
machines and restricted cigarette vending machines (see 
BACKGROUND) for sales to individuals under the legal age. The bill 
increases these penalties as follows:  
1. for a 1
st
 violation, if the owner fails to successfully complete an 
online tobacco education program within 30 days, from $500 to 
$1,000; 
2. for a 2
nd
 violation, from $750 to $1,500; and  
3. for a 3
rd
 violation, from $1,000 to $2,000.  
As under current law, the commissioner may impose fines for 2
nd
 
and 3
rd
 violations that occur within 24 months after the date of the first 
violation.  
Existing law, unchanged by the bill, requires an establishment 
owner who commits a third violation, to immediately remove the 
vending machine from the establishment and prohibits any vending 
machine at the establishment for one year after the removal.  
By law, the DRS commissioner may also assess the following civil 
penalties against a person, dealer, or distributor who violates the 
vending machine laws: (1) $250 for a first violation and (2) $500 for a 
second or third violation within 18 months. After the third violation, 
the vending machine must be immediately removed from the area, 
facility, or business where it is placed and such machines are 
prohibited from the location for one year after the removal (CGS § 12-
289a(b)). 
§ 7 — ALL PAYER CLAIMS DAT ABASE  2021HB-06450-R000237-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: ND 	Page 6 	4/1/21 
 
By law, the state’s health insurance exchange (HIE) charges 
assessments or user fees to health carriers capable of offering a 
qualified health plan through the exchange to cover the exchange’s 
costs. The bill allows the HIE to also charge these assessments or user 
fees to cover the costs of the state’s all-payer claims database. As under 
current law, the HIE may impose interest and penalties on health 
carriers for delinquent payments of these assessments or fees.  
The bill also authorizes the HIE to enter into an agreement with 
OHS to transfer the funds collected for the APCD’s operation and to 
receive data from the ACPD database. Under the bill, the agreement 
must be approved by OPM and is not considered proprietary.  
By law, OHS administers the APCD, which collects data relating to 
medical, pharmacy, dental, and other insurance claims information 
from public and private health insurers. 
§ 8 — INSURANCE FUND 
Existing law requires insurance companies and hospital and 
medical service corporations to annually pay into the Insurance Fund 
an amount that covers OHS’s appropriation, including fringe benefits 
and certain capital equipment purchases. The bill requires the 
appropriation amount to be reduced by the amount of federal 
Medicaid reimbursement it receives for allowable Medicaid 
administrative expenses.  
BACKGROUND 
Modified Risk Tobacco Products (MRTP) 
MRTPs are tobacco products designated by the federal Food and 
Drug Administration as providing less harm or risk of tobacco-related 
disease when compared to other commercially-marketed tobacco 
products, such as combustible cigarettes.  
To qualify as an MRTP, product manufacturers must show, among 
other things, (1) scientific evidence that supports their claims about 
reduced harm or risk, (2) that consumers can adequately understand 
the information and appropriately perceive the relative risk of these  2021HB-06450-R000237-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: ND 	Page 7 	4/1/21 
 
products compared to other tobacco products, and (3) the use of the 
MRTP will significantly reduce the harm and risk of tobacco-related 
disease to individual users and benefit the health of the population as 
a whole.  
Cigarette Vending Machines  
Existing law distinguishes between two types of machines that it 
authorizes to dispense cigarettes. One is the traditional coin-operated 
vending machine. The other is the “restricted cigarette vending 
machine,” which (1) automatically deactivates and cannot be operated 
after each sale and (2) requires a face-to-face interaction or display of 
identification between the purchaser and employee of the business 
where the machine is located. 
Related Bill 
sSB 326 (File 98), favorably reported by the Public Health 
Committee, prohibits e-cigarette dealers and cigarette dealers and 
distributors from selling, offering or displaying for sale, or possessing 
with the intent to sell, flavored cigarettes, tobacco products, e-
cigarettes, and vapor products and extends current law’s underage 
sale penalties for violations. 
COMMITTEE ACTION 
Public Health Committee 
Joint Favorable 
Yea 24 Nay 9 (03/12/2021)