Connecticut 2021 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06504 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 04/14/2021

                     
Researcher: JKL 	Page 1 	4/14/21 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
sHB 6504  
 
AN ACT CONCERNING ANIMAL WELFARE.  
 
SUMMARY 
This bill makes a number of unrelated changes to animal-related 
statutes. Among other things, it:  
1. replaces references to guide dogs in certain environment 
statutes with the federally defined term “service animals” and 
applies existing provisions to service animals in training; 
2. requires, when an animal control officer (ACO) seizes an animal 
that is neglected or cruelly treated and a veterinarian 
determines the animal is too injured or diseased to be treated, 
the ACO to have the animal humanely euthanized by a licensed 
veterinarian; 
3. allows municipalities and regional animal control facilities to 
appoint a temporary ACO from another municipality for up to 
90 days; 
4. requires regional animal control facilities to meet the same 
construction, maintenance, and sanitation standards as 
municipal pounds must under state law and regulations; 
5. requires animal shelters to have dogs and cats examined 
regularly by a licensed veterinarian and maintain records of 
veterinary services rendered, which existing law requires of 
animal importers, and revises fines for violations; 
6. requires the agriculture commissioner to develop a process to 
allow an animal’s owner to request a reduction, from six 
months to four months, in the rabies quarantine period under 
specified circumstances;   2021HB-06504-R000434-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JKL 	Page 2 	4/14/21 
 
7. increases, from 10% to 20%, the maximum amount of the animal 
population control account funds that may be used for 
sterilizing and vaccinating feral cats under the agriculture 
department’s animal population control program (APCP); and 
8. updates the reimbursement amount paid to veterinarians 
participating in the APCP.  
The bill also makes technical and conforming changes. 
EFFECTIVE DATE:  Upon passage, except the APCP provisions are 
effective October 31, 2021. 
§ 1 — POULTRY DEFINITION 
The bill makes a minor change to align the definition of poultry in 
the dog and companion animal statutes with the definition of poultry 
in the poultry dealer statute. (Under the poultry dealer statute, poultry 
is any domestic fowl or game bird raised for food production, 
breeding, exhibition, or sale (CGS § 22-326s).) 
§§ 2, 9 & 10 — SERVICE ANIMALS 
The bill updates the terminology in the environment statutes 
concerning guide dogs to conform with the federal Americans with 
Disabilities Act (ADA). For example, it replaces the phrase “blind, 
deaf, or mobility impaired person” with “person with a disability” and 
the term “guide dog” with “service animal.” 
The bill broadens the applicability of related statutes by defining 
“service animal” as a dog that is (1) individually trained to do work or 
perform tasks for a person with a disability (which is the definition in 
the ADA regulations) or (2) in training to become a service animal.  
Similar to current law, the bill requires a person with a disability to 
obtain a license and tag for his or her dog that is a service animal from 
the town clerk in the town where the animal is owned or kept. It 
eliminates a requirement that the animal’s owner present written 
evidence that the dog is trained to perform services for the person.  2021HB-06504-R000434-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JKL 	Page 3 	4/14/21 
 
Under current law, dog owners must keep control of their dogs 
when near a guide dog. The bill similarly requires dog owners to keep 
control of their dogs when near a service animal. Under current law, a 
guide dog must wear a harness or orange-colored leash and collar that 
readily identifies it as a guide dog. The bill instead requires a service 
animal to wear a harness, vest, or leash and collar that readily 
identifies it as a service animal. 
§§ 3, 4 & 7 — ANIMAL CONTROL OFFIC ERS AND SEIZED 
ANIMALS 
Under current law, if an ACO takes physical custody of an animal 
that the ACO believes is in imminent harm and is neglected or cruelly 
treated and the animal is so injured or diseased in the opinion of a 
licensed veterinarian that it should be destroyed immediately, the 
ACO may humanely destroy it or cause it to be humanely destroyed. 
The bill instead allows the ACO to have the animal hum anely 
euthanized by a licensed veterinarian under those circumstances. 
Under current law, if a court is involved in a case of animal neglect 
or cruelty and determines that the animal is so injured or diseased that 
it should be destroyed, the court may order that the animal be 
humanely destroyed. The bill instead allows the court to order that the 
animal be humanely euthanized by a licensed veterinarian. 
The bill also makes minor, technical, and conforming changes, 
including replacing references to “the chief ACO, any ACO, and any 
municipal ACO” with references to ACOs appointed under state law. 
§ 5 — APPOINTMENT OF TEMPORARY ACO 
The bill allows a municipality’s chief elected official or a regional 
animal control facility (presumably the facility’s operator) to appoint 
an ACO from another municipality to act as the temporary ACO for 
the municipality or region for up to 90 days. The bill grants the 
temporary ACO the same powers and authority he or she has in the 
municipality or region from which he or she came. 
Temporary appointments must be in writing and include 
information on the ACO’s compensation, insurance, and use of  2021HB-06504-R000434-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JKL 	Page 4 	4/14/21 
 
equipment, if any. The chief elected officials of the affected 
municipalities and the affected regional facilities must all approve of 
the temporary appointment. The agriculture commissioner must be 
notified in writing of a temporary appointment within five days after 
the appointment is made. (Presumably, the officials and facility 
operators provide this notice.) 
§ 6 — REGIONAL ANIMAL CONT ROL FACILITIES 
By law, any two or more towns with populations of less than 50,000 
may share a regional pound and be served by a regional ACO. Under 
current law, the towns’ legislative bodies must approve the regional 
pound. The bill instead specifies that if there is a board of selectmen or  
town council, then it approves the regional pound. Otherwise, 
approval lies with a town’s governing body.  
The bill also requires regional pounds to meet the same 
construction, maintenance, and sanitation standards as municipal 
pounds must under state law and regulations. 
§ 8 — ANIMAL SHELTERS AND ANIMAL IMPORTERS 
Veterinary Services Required 
The bill extends to animal shelter operators or maintainers the 
requirement that animal importers have dogs and cats examined by a 
licensed veterinarian within 48 hours of the animals entering the state 
and every 90 days thereafter until the animals are sold, adopted, or 
otherwise transferred. The shelter or importer cannot transfer an 
animal unless a veterinarian (1) examined it within 15 days before the 
transfer and (2) issued a written certificate of health that includes the 
shelter’s or importer’s name, address, and contact information. 
Under current law, an animal importer who violates these 
requirements is subject to a fine of up to $500 for each animal in 
violation. The bill instead subjects an animal importer or animal shelter 
operator or maintainer to a $250 fine per animal for a first violation 
and $500 fine per animal for subsequent violations. 
Record Maintenance  2021HB-06504-R000434-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JKL 	Page 5 	4/14/21 
 
The bill also requires animal shelter operators or maintainers to 
keep records of veterinary services rendered to each dog or cat it 
imported into the state for three years. Existing law requires the same 
of animal importers. 
Under current law, an animal importer who does not maintain the 
records as required is subject to a $500 fine. The bill instead subjects an 
animal importer or animal shelter operator or maintainer who violates 
this provision to a $250 fine for a first violation and $500 fine for 
subsequent violations. 
§ 11 — WAIVER FOR A RABIES QUARANTINE PERIOD 
REDUCTION 
The bill requires the agriculture commissioner to develop a waiver 
request process and form for an animal’s owner, keeper, or 
veterinarian to request a reduction of a rabies quarantine period from 
six months to four months. This applies to an animal that was attacked 
and potentially exposed to rabies and only if the owner, keeper, or 
veterinarian submits proof with the request that the animal was 
vaccinated against rabies within 96 hours after the attack. The 
commissioner must post the waiver request process and form on the 
agriculture department’s website and make them publicly available 
and accessible as well as known to veterinarians in Connecticut. 
§§ 12 & 13 — ANIMAL POPULATION CO NTROL PROGRAM 
(APCP) 
The Department of Agriculture’s APCP (1) provides low-income 
Connecticut residents discounted sterilization and vaccination options 
for their dogs and cats and (2) assists registered nonprofit rescue 
groups with the sterilization and vaccination of feral cats. The 
agriculture commissioner uses an established animal population 
control account for the APCP costs. The account funds come from a 
surcharge on dog licenses, certain animal adoption fees for pounds’ 
unsterilized cats and dogs, and proceeds from commemorative APCP 
“Caring for Pets” license plates. 
The bill increases, from 10% to 20%, the maximum amount of the  2021HB-06504-R000434-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JKL 	Page 6 	4/14/21 
 
animal population control account funds that may be used for 
sterilizing and vaccinating feral cats under the APCP.  
It also updates the reimbursement amount paid to veterinarians 
participating in the APCP. Under current law, a veterinarian receives, 
per sterilization, $120 for a female dog, $100 for a male dog, $70 for a 
female cat, and $50 for a male cat. The bill instead requires the 
agriculture commissioner to establish a reimbursement rate that is up 
to 75% of the market rate or fee charged by veterinarians in 
Connecticut as of October 31, 2021. When services to be performed 
include both sterilization and vaccination, the bill requires the 
reimbursement to be the amount designated for sterilization plus $30, 
instead of $20 as under current law. 
BACKGROUND 
Related Bill 
sHB 6318 (File 119), favorably reported by the Human Services 
Committee, makes changes throughout the general statutes with 
respect to service animals, including aligning state law with the federal 
definition. 
COMMITTEE ACTION 
Environment Committee 
Joint Favorable Substitute 
Yea 32 Nay 0 (03/29/2021)