Connecticut 2021 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06504 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 05/26/2021

                    OFFICE OF FISCAL ANALYSIS 
Legislative Office Building, Room 5200 
Hartford, CT 06106  (860) 240-0200 
http://www.cga.ct.gov/ofa 
sHB-6504 
AN ACT CONCERNING ANIMAL WELFARE. 
As Amended by House "A" (LCO 9152) 
House Calendar No.: 326  
 
Primary Analyst: MR 	5/26/21 
Contributing Analyst(s):    
 
 
 
 
OFA Fiscal Note 
 
State Impact: 
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 22 $ FY 23 $ 
Department of Agriculture Animal 
Population 
Control - 
Acceleration of 
Costs 
See Below See Below 
Department of Agriculture GF - Potential 
Revenue Gain 
Less than 
20,000 
Less than 
20,000 
Note: GF=General Fund  
Municipal Impact: None  
Explanation 
The bill makes various changes to animal-related laws. 
It extends to animal shelter operators the same requirement that 
animal importers currently have (that dogs and cats be examined by a 
veterinarian within 48 hours of the animals entering the state).  
Currently, violators are subject to a fine of up to $500 for each animal 
in violation. The bill instead subjects an animal importer or animal 
shelter operator to a $250 fine per animal for a first violation and $500 
fine per animal for subsequent violations. 
Additionally, the bill requires animal shelter operators or 
maintainers to keep records of certain veterinary services for each dog 
or cat for three years, as current law does for animal importers. The bill 
subjects an animal importer or animal shelter operator or maintainer  2021HB-06504-R01-FN.DOCX 	Page 2 of 3 
 
 
who violates this provision to a $250 fine for a first violation and $500 
fine for subsequent violations. These provisions may result in a 
minimal revenue gain, expected to be less than $20,000 annually, to the 
extent violations occur.  
Also, the bill requires the Department of Agriculture (DoAg) to 
develop a waiver request process and form for an animal’s owner or 
veterinarian to request a reduction of a rabies quarantine period from 
six months to four months for animals exposed to rabies. The bill 
requires DoAg to post the process and form on their website. This is 
not anticipated to result in a fiscal impact as the agency currently has 
expertise for this purpose.  
It increases, from 10% to 20%, the maximum amount of funds that 
may be expended from the animal population control account, 
administered by DoAg, that may be used for sterilizing and 
vaccinating feral cats.
1
  
These sections update the reimbursement paid to veterinarians 
participating in the animal population control program up to 75% of 
the market rate for sterilization and vaccination services, plus $30, 
instead of $20 as under current law. Currently, a veterinarian receives, 
$120 for a female dog, $100 for a male dog, $70 for a female cat, and 
$50 for a male cat, per sterilization, which is expected to be less than 
market rate in most municipalities.  
The increase in reimbursement rate would result in the animal 
population control account expending funds at a rate faster than it 
otherwise would under the bill. The current balance in the animal 
population control account is $644,517. In 2020, there were 5,946 
vouchers were issued under the animal population control program. 
                                                
1
 DoAg's Animal Population Control Program: (1) provides low-income Connecticut 
residents discounted sterilization and vaccination options for dogs and cats, and (2) 
assists registered nonprofit rescue groups with the sterilization and vaccination of 
feral cats. DoAg uses a separate, nonlapsing APC account for these costs. Revenue is 
derived from a surcharge on municipal dog licenses, certain animal adoption fees for 
pounds’ unsterilized cats and dogs, and proceeds from commemorative APCP 
“Caring for Pets” license plates.  2021HB-06504-R01-FN.DOCX 	Page 3 of 3 
 
 
The bill requires a veterinarian to establish a veterinarian-client-
patient relationship with the animal and the animal’s owner which has 
no impact on the state or municipalities, as it applies to private, third-
parties.  
Lastly, the bill makes technical and conforming changes that have 
no fiscal impact.  
House Amendment “A” removes certain provisions about service 
animals and adds the veterinarian-client-patient and veterinary 
telemedicine provisions.  This has no fiscal impact.  
The Out Years 
The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would 
continue into the future subject to the number of animals served under 
the program and the number of violations that occur.