Connecticut 2021 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00837 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 06/08/2021

                     
Researcher: KLM 	Page 1 	6/8/21 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
sSB 837 (File 126, as amended by House "A" and Senate "A")*  
 
AN ACT CONCERNING THE USE OF PERFLUOROALKYL OR 
POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES IN CLASS B FIREFIGHTING 
FOAM.  
 
SUMMARY 
This bill generally prohibits (1) using class B firefighting foam with 
intentionally added perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substance 
(PFAS) and (2) offering for sale or promotional purposes food 
packaging with PFAS intentionally introduced during manufacturing 
or distribution. Under the bill, class B firefighting foam is used to 
extinguish flammable liquid fires and PFAS is a class of fluorinated 
organic chemicals containing at least one fully fluorinated carbon 
atom. 
With respect to the foam, the bill prohibits, upon passage, any 
person, local government, or state agency from using class B 
firefighting foam with intentionally added PFAS in any amount for 
training purposes or testing purposes (i.e., calibration, conformance, 
and fixed system testing). Beginning October 1, 2021, it also prohibits 
anyone from using this foam for vapor suppression or firefighting 
purposes, unless the fire is flammable liquid-based and the 
Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) 
commissioner does not identify an alternative to the foam by July 1, 
2021. 
The bill also exempts from the ban on using the foam for vapor 
suppression or firefighting (1) anyone required by federal law to use it; 
(2) certain facility operators who obtain a limited extension of time for 
compliance; and (3) until October 1, 2023, airport-related entities with 
systems that prevent its release into the environment.  
For packaging, the bill prohibits (1) by December 31, 2023, 
manufacturers and distributors from offering for sale or promotional  2021SB-00837-R02-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: KLM 	Page 2 	6/8/21 
 
purposes food packaging or packaging components with intentionally 
introduced PFAS and (2) using a material that replaces a chemical 
regulated by the state packaging and packaging components law in an 
amount or way that creates an equal or greater hazard than the 
regulated chemical (see BACKGROUND). 
The bill expands on the current procedure to show that a package or 
packaging component complies with the law’s restrictions (i.e., 
certificates of compliance), which applies to existing restrictions on 
lead, mercury, cadmium, and hexavalent chromium and the bill’s 
PFAS ban. It applies existing civil and criminal penalties for violating 
the packaging and component law to the ban on PFAS in food 
packaging, including those for making false statements in certificates 
of compliance (see BACKGROUND). 
The bill requires the DEEP commissioner, by October 1, 2021, to 
develop or identify a take-back program for municipally owned class B 
firefighting foam with PFAS that applies best management practices 
for its disposal.  
Lastly, it makes minor, technical, and conforming changes. 
*Senate Amendment “A” principally (1) expands the general ban on 
using class B firefighting foam with PFAS to include testing, rather 
than only training, purposes; (2) forwards the dates associated with, 
and adds three exemptions to, the ban on using the foam for 
firefighting, and also adds using the foam for vapor suppression to this 
ban; (3) limits the municipal take-back program to class B firefighting 
foam with PFAS, rather than any municipal source of PFAS; (4) adds 
the provisions on food packaging with PFAS; and (5) adds the 
provision on substitute chemical hazards in packaging. 
*House Amendment “A” (1) extends the effective date of the ban on 
PFAS in food packaging from July 1, 2021, to October 1, 2021, and (2) 
eliminates the provision that considers using PFAS as a processing 
agent, mold release agent, or intermediate to be an intentional 
introduction when it is detected in the final package or component.  2021SB-00837-R02-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: KLM 	Page 3 	6/8/21 
 
EFFECTIVE DATE:  Upon passage, except that the provisions on 
PFAS in food packaging and packaging components are effective 
October 1, 2021. 
§ 1 — FIREFIGHTING FOAM  
Firefighting and Vapor Suppression Use Exemptions 
Beginning October 1, 2021, the bill generally prohibits using class B 
firefighting foam with intentionally added PFAS for vapor suppression 
or firefighting purposes. However, the bill allows the foam to be used 
when: 
1. the fire is a flammable liquid-based fire and the DEEP 
commissioner does not identify an alternative by July 1, 2021, or 
2. federal law requires someone to use the foam, but only until the 
earlier of (a) a change in federal law prohibiting the foam’s use 
or (b) one year after federal law no longer requires its use. 
The bill also allows the foam to be used by (1) certain facility 
operators who obtain a limited extension of time for compliance from 
the DEEP commissioner and (2) until October 1, 2023, an airport-
related entity with a fire suppression system that uses the foam has 
measures to prevent its release into the environment (see below). 
Extension of Time to Comply. Under the bill, the operator of a 
chemical plant; oil refinery; or flammable liquid terminal, storage, or 
distribution facility may apply to the DEEP commissioner for an 
extension of time to comply with the restrictions on using the foam for 
vapor suppression or firefighting purposes. The extension request 
must specify (1) why the extension is necessary and (2) what 
containment, treatment, and disposal measures will be used to prevent 
releases of the foam into the environment until compliance can occur. 
The bill allows the commissioner to grant an extension, for no 
longer than two years, if she determines that it is needed to remove or 
repurpose a fire suppression system containing the foam. 
Airport Entities. The bill exempts, until October 1, 2023, fire  2021SB-00837-R02-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: KLM 	Page 4 	6/8/21 
 
suppression systems containing the foam that are used by airport-
related entity facilities as long as, by the date of the bill’s passage, the 
system uses mitigation measures to prevent releases of the foam into 
the environment. These measures must include implementing plans 
and physical features designed to prevent the releases by containment, 
treatment, and disposal, even when the foam is used in its intended 
manner. By October 1, 2023, the bill requires the suppression systems 
to be removed entirely or repurposed so that the foam is removed 
from them. 
Enforcement 
The bill authorizes the DEEP commissioner to enforce the 
restrictions on using class B firefighting foam with intentionally added 
PFAS within available appropriations. 
§§ 2-4 — PACKAGING AND PACKAGING COMPONE NTS 
PFAS in Food Packaging 
The bill prohibits, as soon as feasible but no later than December 31, 
2023, manufacturers and distributors from offering for sale or 
promotional purposes food packages with PFAS that was intentionally 
introduced during manufacturing or distribution. It also prohibits 
using a material to replace PFAS or any other chemical regulated by 
the packaging and packaging component law that, either in amount or 
manner, equals or exceeds the hazard created by the regulated 
chemical. (Although the bill adds PFAS, existing law allows the DEEP 
commissioner to report to the governor and the legislature on other 
toxic substances to which the packaging and packaging component 
law should apply (CGS § 22a-255m(a)).) 
Under the bill, “food packaging” is a package or packaging 
component applied to or in direct contact with food or beverage. 
Additionally, the bill considers the act of “intentionally introducing” 
PFAS to be deliberate use to make a package or component where 
PFAS is wanted in the final product for a specific characteristic, 
appearance, or quality.  
However, the bill also specifies that it is not considered “intentional  2021SB-00837-R02-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: KLM 	Page 5 	6/8/21 
 
introduction” to use some amounts of PFAS in the recycled materials 
portion of post-consumer recycled materials as feedstock for 
manufacturing new packaging materials, so long as the new package 
or packaging component complies with the packaging and packaging 
component law. Under the bill, “post-consumer recycled material” is 
household-generated material or a material generated by commercial, 
industrial, and institutional facilities as end-users of the product, 
which can no longer be used for its intended purpose, including 
returns of material from the distribution chain. It does not include 
refuse-derived fuel or other material destroyed by incineration.  
Certificate of Compliance 
Current law allows package and packaging component 
manufacturers and distributors to show that they comply with the 
law’s composition restrictions by providing a certificate of compliance 
stating that they relied on the written assurance from the manufacturer 
about the package’s or component’s content. The provision applies to 
the following four metals: lead, cadmium, mercury, and hexavalent 
chromium. 
Under the bill, upon request by either a packaging or packaging 
component purchaser or the DEEP commissioner, a manufacturer or 
distributor must provide a certificate of compliance, signed by an 
authorized official, stating that it meets the law’s content requirements 
for either PFAS or the four metals current law covers. If the package or 
component meets one of the existing exemptions that generally apply 
to the restricted metals, the certificate must state the specific reason it 
applies.  
Under the bill, a request must be in writing and specific as to the 
requested package or component information. The manufacturer or 
distributor, as applicable, must respond to the request within 60 days 
after receiving it.  
Manufacturers and suppliers must keep copies of their certificates 
on file, but they may make the certificates available on their websites 
or through an authorized representative, such as a packaging  2021SB-00837-R02-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: KLM 	Page 6 	6/8/21 
 
clearinghouse.  
Amended Certificates 
If a package or packaging component manufacturer or distributor 
reformulates or creates a new package or component, the bill requires 
it to amend the applicable certificate of compliance for the 
reformulated or new product.  
Suspected Violation 
Under the bill, if the commissioner has grounds to suspect that a 
package (but not a packaging component) is offered for sale in 
violation of existing law and the bill, she may ask its manufacturer or 
distributor to provide a certificate of compliance within the next 30 
days. 
The bill requires the manufacturer or distributor to (1) give the 
commissioner the certificate attesting that the package complies with 
the law or (2) notify anyone selling the package in Connecticut that 
doing so is prohibited and give the commissioner a copy of the notice 
with the names and addresses of those sellers who received it. 
BACKGROUND 
Packaging and Components 
Under existing law, a “package” is a container used to market, 
protect, or handle a product and includes a unit package, intermediate 
package, and shipping container. It also includes an unsealed 
receptacle, such as a crate, cup, tray, wrapper, or bag, among other 
things. “Packaging components” are package parts such as interior or 
exterior blocking, bracing, cushioning, weatherproofing, exterior 
strapping, coating, closure, ink, label, dye, pigment, adhesive, 
stabilizer, or another additive (CGS § 22a-255h). 
Penalties 
By law, anyone who violates the packaging and packaging 
component law is subject to a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per offense, 
which the court sets. A violation includes making a false statement in a 
certificate of compliance. The law makes each violation, and each day a  2021SB-00837-R02-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: KLM 	Page 7 	6/8/21 
 
violation continues, a separate and distinct offense. 
Knowingly violating this law, including false statements in 
certificates of compliance, is punishable by a fine of up to $50,000, up 
to one year in prison, or both. Each false statement is subject to the 
possible fine. 
The law also allows the DEEP commissioner to ask the attorney 
general to seek an injunction to stop someone from continuing a 
violation. It requires the attorney general, if asked by the 
commissioner, to take court action to recover a civil penalty a court 
imposes for a violation of these laws (CGS § 22a-255l).  
Related Bill 
sSB 926 (File 452), favorably reported by the Environment 
Committee, generally prohibits, beginning October 1, 2023, offering for 
sale or promotional purposes packages or packaging components with 
detectable PFAS or PFAS that was introduced during manufacturing 
or distribution. 
COMMITTEE ACTION 
Environment Committee 
Joint Favorable Substitute 
Yea 32 Nay 0 (02/26/2021)