Connecticut 2021 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00926 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 04/14/2021

                     
Researcher: KLM 	Page 1 	4/14/21 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
sSB 926  
 
AN ACT CONCERNING THE PRESENCE OF PFAS IN CERTAIN 
CONSUMER PACKAGING.  
 
SUMMARY 
This bill prohibits, beginning October 1, 2023, manufacturers, 
suppliers, and distributors from offering for sale or promotional 
purposes packages or packaging components with (1) any detectable 
amount of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) or (2) 
PFAS that was introduced to the package or component during 
manufacturing or distribution (see BACKGROUND). The bill exempts 
from the PFAS ban packages and packaging components for medical 
devices or equipment. 
Existing law authorizes the Department of Energy and 
Environmental Protection (DEEP) commissioner to report to the 
governor and the legislature on the effectiveness of the state’s 
packaging restrictions, including recommending that the law be 
expanded to include other toxic substances. The bill authorizes the 
commissioner to (1) create a list of packaging chemicals of high 
concern, which must be considered toxic chemicals and (2) recommend 
to the Environment Committee that chemicals on the list be statutorily 
banned from packaging within two years after making the 
recommendation.  
The bill expands upon the current procedure for showing that a 
package or packaging components comply with the law’s restrictions 
(i.e., certificates of compliance), which apply to the existing restrictions 
on lead, mercury, cadmium, and hexavalent chromium and the bill’s 
ban on PFAS chemicals. It also prohibits material used to replace a 
chemical that is banned from packaging or packaging components 
from being used in an amount or way that creates a hazard at least 
equal to the hazard of the banned chemical.  2021SB-00926-R000452-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: KLM 	Page 2 	4/14/21 
 
The bill applies existing civil and criminal penalties for violations of 
the packing and packing component law to its ban on PFAS in 
packaging and components, including those for making false 
statements in certificates of compliance (see BACKGROUND). 
It also makes minor, technical, and conforming changes. 
EFFECTIVE DATE:  July 1, 2021 
PFAS IN PACKAGING AN D COMPONENTS 
The law’s existing restrictions on lead, mercury, cadmium, and 
hexavalent chromium in packaging and packaging components 
applies to intentional introductions. The bill expands the law’s 
meaning of intentional introductions to packaging and components by 
applying it to PFAS and other regulated chemicals. But the bill’s ban 
on PFAS in components applies regardless of whether there was intent 
to introduce it.  
The bill also considers using a regulated chemical as a processing 
agent, mold release agent, or intermediate as an intentional 
introduction when the chemical is detected in the final package or 
component. 
CERTIFICATE OF COMPL IANCE 
Current law allows package and packaging component 
manufacturers and distributers to show that they comply with the 
law’s restrictions by providing a certificate of compliance saying that 
they relied on the written assurance from the manufacturer about the 
package’s or component’s content.  
The bill instead makes manufacturers and suppliers responsible for 
providing the certificates. It also (1) requires certificates to be provided 
to the public, not just the DEEP commissioner, upon request; (2) allows 
certificates to be made available through a website; (3) requires an 
amended or new certificate when a package or component is changed 
or new; and (4) if the commissioner suspects a violation of the law, 
requires her to receive certain purchaser information.  2021SB-00926-R000452-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: KLM 	Page 3 	4/14/21 
 
Content 
Under the bill, if requested by a purchaser, a manufacturer or 
supplier of a package or component must provide a certificate of 
compliance, signed by an authorized official, saying that it meets the 
law’s content requirements. If the package or component meets one of 
the existing exemptions that generally apply to the restricted metals, 
the certificate must state the specific reason the exemption applies. 
Manufacturers and suppliers must keep copies of their certificates on 
file. 
Providing Certificates Upon Request 
The bill requires certificates, or copies of them, to be provided to the 
commissioner or the public if either requests them. It allows a 
manufacturer or supplier to make a certificate available (1) on the 
manufacturer’s website or (2) through an authorized representative of 
the manufacturer, such as a packaging clearinghouse. (It is unclear 
how a supplier could make a certificate available on a manufacturer’s 
or representative’s website.) 
Under the bill, a request from the public must be made in writing 
and have a copy provided to the commissioner. It must be specific as 
to the requested package or component information. The manufacturer 
or supplier, as applicable, must respond to the request within 60 days 
after receiving it.  
The bill also requires a purchaser who receives a certificate of 
compliance to keep it for the entire time he or she uses the associated 
package or component.  
The bill specifies that the certificate of compliance requirement does 
not apply to packaging or packaging components for medical devices 
or medical equipment.  
Amended Certificates 
If a package or package component manufacturer or supplier 
reformulates or creates a new package or component, the bill requires 
it to provide an amended or new certificate of compliance to all current  2021SB-00926-R000452-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: KLM 	Page 4 	4/14/21 
 
purchasers.  
Suspected Violation 
Under the bill, if the commissioner has grounds to suspect that a 
package (but not a packaging component) is offered for sale in 
violation of existing law and the bill, she may ask the package’s 
manufacturer or distributor (but not the supplier) to provide a 
certificate of compliance within the next 30 days. 
The bill requires the manufacturer or distributor to (1) give the 
commissioner the certificate attesting that the package is free of a 
regulated chemical (but not a metal); (2) notify anyone who sells the 
package in Connecticut that selling it is prohibited; and (3) give the 
commissioner a copy of the notice to sellers and a list of who received 
it, with their addresses. 
TOXIC CHEMICALS LIST 
The bill allows the DEEP commissioner to periodically review, 
revise, and publish a list of packaging chemicals of high concern. 
Chemicals on the list must be considered toxic chemicals. 
 The bill requires the commissioner to remove a chemical from the 
list if it no longer meets the criteria for which it was included. The bill 
caps at 10 the number of chemicals that may be on the list at any time. 
Eligibility for Listing 
The bill establishes three standards for the commissioner to place a 
chemical on the list. 
First, a chemical can be listed if the commissioner included it on 
DEEP’s list of chemicals of concern due to credible scientific evidence 
that it is: 
1. a carcinogen, reproductive or developmental toxicant, or 
endocrine disruptor or 
2. (a) persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; (b) very persistent 
and very bioaccumulative; (c) persistent, mobile and toxic; or  2021SB-00926-R000452-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: KLM 	Page 5 	4/14/21 
 
(d) very persistent and very mobile.  
The commissioner may also include a chemical on the list if she 
determines that there is strong credible scientific evidence (rather than 
just credible scientific evidence) that it is a human carcinogen, 
reproductive or developmental toxicant, or endocrine disruptor. 
Lastly, the list may include a chemical if the commissioner 
determines that there is strong credible scientific evidence that it was: 
1. found in human blood, breast milk, urine, or other bodily 
tissues or fluids, through bioengineering studies; 
2. found in packaging through sampling and analysis; and 
3. added to or in a package. 
Under the bill, “credible scientific evidence” is study results that are 
the product of an independent scientific peer-reviewed experimental 
design and conduct. The results also must be published in a peer-
reviewed journal or a publication from an authoritative federal or 
international governmental agency (e.g., U.S. Department of Health 
and Human Services’ National Toxicology Program, World Health 
Organization, and the European Chemicals Agency).  
The criteria for determining if a substance is “persistent, 
bioaccumulative, and toxic” or “very persistent and very 
bioaccumulative” are set in Annex XIII of the Registration, Evaluation, 
Authorisation, and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) Regulation of 
the European Union (EC) No. 1907/2006 of the European Parliament 
and the Council, or its amendments. Similarly, the criteria for 
determining if a substance is “persistent, mobile, and toxic” or “very 
persistent and very mobile” is set in the following 2019 REACH report: 
“REACH: Improvement of guidance and methods for the identification 
and assessment of PMT/vPvM substances: Final Report.” 
BACKGROUND 
Packaging and Components  2021SB-00926-R000452-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: KLM 	Page 6 	4/14/21 
 
Under existing law, “packaging” is a container used to market, 
protect, or handle a product and includes a unit package, intermediate 
package, and shipping container. It also includes an unsealed 
receptacle, such as a crate, cup, tray, wrapper, or bag, among other 
things. “Packaging components” are package parts such as interior or 
exterior blocking, bracing, cushioning, weatherproofing, exterior 
strapping, coating, closure, ink, label, dye, pigment, adhesive, 
stabilizer, or another additive. 
Penalties 
By law, anyone who violates the packaging and packing component 
law is subject to a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per offense, which the 
court sets. A violation includes making a false statement in a certificate 
of compliance. The law makes each violation, and each day a violation 
continues, a separate and distinct offense. 
Knowingly violating this law, including false statements in 
certificates of compliance, is punishable by a fine of up to $50,000, up 
to two years in prison, or both. Each false statement is subject to the 
possible fine. 
The law also allows the DEEP commissioner to ask the attorney 
general to seek an injunction to stop someone from continuing a 
violation. It requires the attorney general, if asked by the 
commissioner, to take court action to recover a civil penalty a court 
imposes for a violation of these laws (CGS § 22a-255l).  
COMMITTEE ACTION 
Environment Committee 
Joint Favorable Substitute 
Yea 21 Nay 11 (03/29/2021)