Connecticut 2021 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01093 Chaptered / Bill

Filed 06/03/2021

                     
 
 
Substitute Senate Bill No. 1093 
 
Public Act No. 21-33 
 
 
AN ACT CONCERNING CIVILIAN POLICE REVIEW BOARDS, 
SECURITY GUARDS, BODY -WORN RECORDING EQUIPMENT, 
SEARCHES BY POLICE, LIMITATIONS ON OFFENSES SUBJECT 
TO AUTOMATIC ERASURE, ENTICING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT A 
CRIME, LAWFUL ORDERS BY POLICE OFFICERS AND NOTICE TO 
A VICTIM CONCERNING AUTOMATIC ERASURE OF CRIMINAL 
RECORD HISTORY. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General 
Assembly convened: 
 
Section 1. Section 7-294aaa of the general statutes is repealed and the 
following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2021): 
(a) The legislative body of a town may, by ordinance, establish a 
civilian police review board. The ordinance shall, at a minimum, 
prescribe: (1) The scope of authority of the civilian police review board; 
(2) the number of members of the civilian police review board; (3) the 
process for the selection of board members, whether elected or 
appointed; (4) the term of office for board members; and (5) the 
procedure for filling any vacancy in the membership of the civilian 
police review board. 
(b) Any civilian police review board established pursuant to 
subsection (a) of this section may be vested with the authority to: (1) 
Issue subpoenas to compel the attendance of witnesses before such  Substitute Senate Bill No. 1093 
 
Public Act No. 21-33 	2 of 21 
 
board; and (2) require the production for examination of any books and 
papers that such board deems relevant to any matter under 
investigation or in question. 
(c) (1) The person to whom such subpoena is issued may, not later 
than fifteen days after service of such subpoena, or on or before the time 
specified in the subpoena for compliance if such time is less than fifteen 
days after service, serve upon the board written objection to the 
subpoena and file such objection in the Superior Court which shall 
adjudicate such objection in accordance with the rules of the court. 
(2) If the person to whom such subpoena is issued fails to appear or 
if having appeared refuses to testify or produce the evidence required 
by such subpoena, the Superior Court, upon application of such board, 
shall have jurisdiction to order such person to appear or to give 
testimony or produce such evidence, as the case may be. 
[(c)] (d) The provisions of this section shall not be construed to affect 
the operation of, or impose any limitation upon, a civilian police review 
board established prior to July 31, 2020. 
[(d)] (e) Upon receipt of a written request from the Office of the 
Inspector General, established pursuant to section 51-277e, a civilian 
police review board shall stay and take no further action in connection 
with any proceeding that is the subject of an investigation or criminal 
prosecution that is being conducted pursuant to said section or section 
51-277a. Any stay of proceedings imposed pursuant to this subsection 
shall not exceed six months from the date on which the civilian police 
review board receives such written request from the Office of the 
Inspector General, and such stay of proceedings may be terminated 
sooner if the Office of the Inspector General provides written 
notification to the civilian police review board that a stay of proceedings 
is no longer required.  Substitute Senate Bill No. 1093 
 
Public Act No. 21-33 	3 of 21 
 
Sec. 2. Subsection (f) of section 29-6d of the general statutes is 
repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 
1, 2021): 
(f) (1) If a police officer is giving a formal statement about the use of 
force or if a police officer is the subject of a disciplinary investigation in 
which a recording from body-worn recording equipment or a 
dashboard camera with a remote recorder, as defined in subsection (c) 
of section 7-277b, is being considered as part of a review of an incident, 
the officer shall [(1)] have the right to review (A) such recording in the 
presence of the officer's attorney or labor representative, and [(2) have 
the right to review] (B) recordings from other body-worn recording 
equipment capturing the officer's image or voice during the incident. 
Not later than forty-eight hours following an officer's review of a 
recording under subparagraph (A) of this subdivision, [(1) of this 
subsection,] or if the officer does not review the recording, not later than 
ninety-six hours following the [recorded incident] initiation of such 
disciplinary investigation, whichever is earlier, such recording shall be 
disclosed, upon request, to the public, subject to the provisions of 
subsection (g) of this section. 
(2) If a request is made for public disclosure of a recording from body-
worn recording equipment or a dashboard camera of an incident about 
which (A) a police officer has not been asked to give a formal statement 
about the alleged use of force, or (B) a disciplinary investigation has not 
been initiated, any police officer whose image or voice is captured on 
the recording shall have the right to review such recording in the 
presence of the officer's attorney or labor representative. Not later than 
forty-eight hours following an officer's review of a recording under this 
subdivision, or if the officer does not review the recording, not later than 
ninety-six hours following the request for disclosure, whichever is 
earlier, such recording shall be disclosed to the public, subject to the 
provisions of subsection (g) of this section.  Substitute Senate Bill No. 1093 
 
Public Act No. 21-33 	4 of 21 
 
Sec. 3. Subsection (f) of section 29-6d of the general statutes, as 
amended by section 19 of public act 20-1 of the July special session, is 
repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 
2022): 
(f) (1) If a police officer is giving a formal statement about the use of 
force or if a police officer is the subject of a disciplinary investigation in 
which a recording from body-worn recording equipment or a 
dashboard camera is being considered as part of a review of an incident, 
the officer shall [(1)] have the right to review (A) such recording in the 
presence of the officer's attorney or labor representative, and [(2) have 
the right to review] (B) recordings from other body-worn recording 
equipment capturing the officer's image or voice during the incident. 
Not later than forty-eight hours following an officer's review of a 
recording under subparagraph (A) of this subdivision, [(1) of this 
subsection,] or if the officer does not review the recording, not later than 
ninety-six hours following the [recorded incident] initiation of such 
disciplinary investigation, whichever is earlier, such recording shall be 
disclosed, upon request, to the public, subject to the provisions of 
subsection (g) of this section. 
(2) If a request is made for public disclosure of a recording from body-
worn recording equipment or a dashboard camera of an incident about 
which (A) a police officer has not been asked to give a formal statement 
about the alleged use of force, or (B) a disciplinary investigation has not 
been initiated, any police officer whose image or voice is captured on 
the recording shall have the right to review such recording in the 
presence of the officer's attorney or labor representative. Not later than 
forty-eight hours following an officer's review of a recording under this 
subdivision, or if the officer does not review the recording, not later than 
ninety-six hours following the request for disclosure, whichever is 
earlier, such recording shall be disclosed to the public, subject to the 
provisions of subsection (g) of this section.  Substitute Senate Bill No. 1093 
 
Public Act No. 21-33 	5 of 21 
 
Sec. 4. Subsection (c) of section 29-161h of the general statutes is 
repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 
1, 2021): 
(c) No license shall be issued to any person who has been (1) 
convicted of any felony, (2) convicted of any misdemeanor under 
section 21a-279, 53a-58, 53a-61, 53a-61a, 53a-62, 53a-63, 53a-96, 53a-175, 
53a-176, 53a-178 or 53a-181d, or equivalent conviction in another 
jurisdiction, within the past seven years, (3) convicted of any offense 
involving moral turpitude, (4) discharged from military service under 
conditions that demonstrate questionable moral character, or (5) 
decertified as a police officer or otherwise had his or her certification 
canceled, revoked or refused renewal pursuant to subsection (c) of 
section 7-294d, as amended by this act, or under the laws of any other 
jurisdiction. 
Sec. 5. Section 29-161q of the general statutes is repealed and the 
following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2021): 
(a) Any security service or business may employ as many security 
officers as such security service or business deems necessary for the 
conduct of the business, provided such security officers are of good 
moral character and at least eighteen years of age. 
(b) No person hired or otherwise engaged to perform work as a 
security officer, as defined in section 29-152u, shall perform the duties 
of a security officer prior to being licensed as a security officer by the 
Commissioner of Emergency Services and Public Protection, except as 
provided in subsection (h) of this section. Each applicant for a license 
shall complete a minimum of eight hours training in the following areas: 
Basic first aid, search and seizure laws and regulations, use of force, 
basic criminal justice and public safety issues. The commissioner shall 
waive such training for any person who, while serving in the armed 
forces or the National Guard, or if such person is a veteran, within two  Substitute Senate Bill No. 1093 
 
Public Act No. 21-33 	6 of 21 
 
years of such person's discharge from the armed forces, presents proof 
that such person has completed military training that is equivalent to 
the training required by this subsection, and, if applicable, such person's 
military discharge document or a certified copy thereof. For the 
purposes of this subsection, "veteran" means any person who was 
discharged or released under conditions other than dishonorable from 
active service in the armed forces, "armed forces" has the same meaning 
as provided in section 27-103, and "military discharge document" has 
the same meaning as provided in section 1-219. The training shall be 
approved by the commissioner in accordance with regulations adopted 
pursuant to section 29-161x. The commissioner may not grant a license 
to any person who has been decertified as a police officer or otherwise 
had his or her certification canceled, revoked or refused renewal 
pursuant to subsection (c) of section 7-294d, as amended by this act, or 
under the laws of any other jurisdiction. 
(1) On and after October 1, 2008, no person or employee of an 
association, corporation or partnership shall conduct such training 
without the approval of the commissioner except as provided in 
subdivision (2) of this subsection. Application for such approval shall 
be submitted on forms prescribed by the commissioner and 
accompanied by a fee of forty dollars. Such application shall be made 
under oath and shall contain the applicant's name, address, date and 
place of birth, employment for the previous five years, education or 
training in the subjects required to be taught under this subsection, any 
convictions for violations of the law and such other information as the 
commissioner may require by regulation adopted pursuant to section 
29-161x to properly investigate the character, competency and integrity 
of the applicant. No person shall be approved as an instructor for such 
training who has been convicted of a felony, a sexual offense or a crime 
of moral turpitude or who has been denied approval as a security 
service licensee, a security officer or instructor in the security industry 
by any licensing authority, or whose approval has been revoked or  Substitute Senate Bill No. 1093 
 
Public Act No. 21-33 	7 of 21 
 
suspended. The term for such approval shall not exceed two years. Not 
later than two business days after a change of address, any person 
approved as an instructor in accordance with this section shall notify the 
commissioner of such change and such notification shall include both 
the old and new addresses. 
(2) If a security officer training course described in this subsection is 
approved by the commissioner on or before September 30, 2008, the 
instructor of such course shall have until April 1, 2009, to apply for 
approval as an instructor in accordance with subdivision (1) of this 
subsection. 
(3) Each person approved as an instructor in accordance with this 
section may apply for the renewal of such approval on a form approved 
by the commissioner, accompanied by a fee of forty dollars. Such form 
may require the disclosure of any information necessary for the 
commissioner to determine whether the instructor's suitability to serve 
as an instructor has changed since the issuance of the prior approval. 
The term of such renewed approval shall not exceed two years. 
(c) Not later than two years after successful completion of the training 
required pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, or the waiver of such 
training, the applicant may submit an application for a license as a 
security officer on forms furnished by the commissioner and, under 
oath, shall give the applicant's name, address, date and place of birth, 
employment for the previous five years, experience in the position 
applied for, including military training and weapons qualifications, any 
convictions for violations of the law and such other information as the 
commissioner may require, by regulation, to properly investigate the 
character, competency and integrity of the applicant. The commissioner 
shall require any applicant for a license under this section to submit to 
state and national criminal history records checks conducted in 
accordance with section 29-17a. Each applicant shall submit with the 
application two sets of his or her fingerprints on forms specified and  Substitute Senate Bill No. 1093 
 
Public Act No. 21-33 	8 of 21 
 
furnished by the commissioner, two full-face photographs, two inches 
wide by two inches high, taken not earlier than six months prior to the 
date of application, and a one-hundred-dollar licensing fee, made 
payable to the state. Any applicant who received a waiver as provided 
in subsection (b) of this section shall be exempt from payment of such 
licensing fee. Subject to the provisions of section 46a-80, no person shall 
be approved for a license who has been convicted of a felony, any sexual 
offense or any crime involving moral turpitude, or who has been 
refused a license under the provisions of sections 29-161g to 29-161x, 
inclusive, for any reason except minimum experience, or whose license, 
having been granted, has been revoked or is under suspension. Upon 
being satisfied of the suitability of the applicant for licensure, the 
commissioner may license the applicant as a security officer. Such 
license shall be renewed every five years for a one-hundred-dollar fee. 
The commissioner shall send a notice of the expiration date of such 
license to the holder of such license, by first class mail, not less than 
ninety days before such expiration, and shall enclose with such notice 
an application for renewal. The security officer license shall be valid for 
a period of ninety days after its expiration date unless the license has 
been revoked or is under suspension pursuant to section 29-161v. An 
application for renewal filed with the commissioner after the expiration 
date shall be accompanied by a late fee of twenty-five dollars. The 
commissioner shall not renew any license that has been expired for more 
than ninety days. 
(d) Upon the security officer's successful completion of training and 
licensing by the commissioner, or immediately upon hiring a licensed 
security officer, the security service employing such security officer 
shall apply to register such security officer with the commissioner on 
forms provided by the commissioner. Such application shall be 
accompanied by payment of a forty-dollar application fee payable to the 
state. The Division of State Police within the Department of Emergency 
Services and Public Protection shall keep on file the completed  Substitute Senate Bill No. 1093 
 
Public Act No. 21-33 	9 of 21 
 
registration form and all related material. An identification card with 
the name, date of birth, address, full-face photograph, physical 
descriptors and signature of the applicant shall be issued to the security 
officer, and shall be carried by the security officer at all times while 
performing the duties associated with the security officer's employment. 
Registered security officers, in the course of performing their duties, 
shall present such card for inspection upon the request of a law 
enforcement officer. 
(e) The security service shall notify the commissioner not later than 
five days after the termination of employment of any registered 
employee. 
(f) Any fee or portion of a fee paid pursuant to this section shall not 
be refundable. 
(g) No person, firm or corporation shall employ or otherwise engage 
any person as a security officer, as defined in section 29-152u, unless 
such person (1) is a licensed security officer, or (2) meets the 
requirements of subsection (h) of this section. 
(h) During the time that an application for a license as a security 
officer is pending with the commissioner, the applicant may perform the 
duties of security officer, provided (1) the security service employing 
the applicant conducts, or has a consumer reporting agency regulated 
under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act conduct, a state and national 
criminal history records check and determines the applicant meets the 
requirements of subsection (c) of this section to be a security officer, (2) 
the applicant (A) successfully completed the training required pursuant 
to subsection (b) of this section, or obtained a waiver of such training, 
and (B) performs the duties of a security officer under the direct on-site 
supervision of a licensed security officer with at least one year of 
experience as a licensed security officer, and (3) the applicant has not 
been decertified as a police officer or otherwise had his or her  Substitute Senate Bill No. 1093 
 
Public Act No. 21-33 	10 of 21 
 
certification canceled, revoked or refused renewal pursuant to 
subsection (c) of section 7-294d, as amended by this act, or under the 
laws of any other jurisdiction. The applicant shall not perform such 
duties at a public or private preschool, elementary or secondary school 
or at a facility licensed and used exclusively as a child care center, as 
described in subdivision (1) of subsection (a) of section 19a-77. The 
applicant shall cease to perform such duties pursuant to this subsection 
when the commissioner grants or denies the pending application for a 
security license under this section. 
(i) Any person, firm or corporation that violates any provision of 
subsection (b), (d), (e), (g) or (h) of this section shall be fined seventy-
five dollars for each offense. Each distinct violation of this section shall 
be a separate offense and, in the case of a continuing violation, each day 
thereof shall be deemed a separate offense.  
Sec. 6. Section 54-33b of the general statutes is repealed and the 
following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2021): 
(a) [The consent of a person given to a law enforcement official to 
conduct a search of such person shall not, absent the existence of 
probable cause, constitute justification for such law enforcement official 
to conduct such search] A law enforcement official may ask a person if 
he or she may conduct a search of their person, provided such law 
enforcement official has reasonable and articulable suspicion that 
weapons, contraband or other evidence of a crime is contained upon the 
person, or that the search is reasonably necessary to further an ongoing 
law enforcement investigation. A law enforcement official who solicits 
consent to search a person shall, whether or not the consent is granted, 
complete a police report documenting the reasonable and articulable 
suspicion for the solicitation of consent, or the facts and circumstances 
that support the search being reasonably necessary to further an 
ongoing law enforcement investigation.  Substitute Senate Bill No. 1093 
 
Public Act No. 21-33 	11 of 21 
 
(b) A law enforcement official serving a search warrant may, if such 
official has reason to believe that any of the property described in the 
warrant is concealed in the garments of any person in or upon the place 
or thing to be searched, search the person for the purpose of seizing the 
same. When the person to be searched is a woman, the search shall be 
made by a female law enforcement official or other woman assisting in 
the service of the warrant, or by a woman designated by the judge or 
judge trial referee issuing the warrant. 
Sec. 7. Section 54-33a of the general statutes is repealed and the 
following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2021): 
(a) As used in sections 54-33a to 54-33g, inclusive, "property" 
includes, but is not limited to, documents, books, papers, films, 
recordings, records, data and any other tangible thing; and "tracking 
device" means an electronic or mechanical device that permits the 
tracking of the movement of a person or object. 
(b) Upon complaint on oath by any state's attorney or assistant state's 
attorney or by any two credible persons, to any judge of the Superior 
Court or judge trial referee, that such state's attorney or assistant state's 
attorney or such persons have probable cause to believe that any 
property (1) possessed, controlled, designed or intended for use or 
which is or has been used or which may be used as the means of 
committing any criminal offense; or (2) which was stolen or embezzled; 
or (3) which constitutes evidence of an offense, or which constitutes 
evidence that a particular person participated in the commission of an 
offense, is within or upon any place, thing or person, such judge or judge 
trial referee, except as provided in section 54-33j, may issue a warrant 
commanding a proper officer to enter into or upon such place or thing, 
search such place, thing or person and take into such officer's custody 
all such property named in the warrant. 
(c) Upon complaint on oath by any state's attorney or assistant state's  Substitute Senate Bill No. 1093 
 
Public Act No. 21-33 	12 of 21 
 
attorney or by any two credible persons, to any judge of the Superior 
Court or judge trial referee, that such state's attorney or assistant state's 
attorney or such persons have probable cause to believe that a criminal 
offense has been, is being, or will be committed and that the use of a 
tracking device will yield evidence of the commission of that offense, 
such judge or judge trial referee may issue a warrant authorizing the 
installation and use of a tracking device. The complaint shall identify 
the person on which or the property to, in or on which the tracking 
device is to be installed, and, if known, the owner of such property. 
(d) A warrant may issue only on affidavit sworn to by the 
complainant or complainants before the judge or judge trial referee and 
establishing the grounds for issuing the warrant, which affidavit shall 
be part of the arrest file. If the judge or judge trial referee is satisfied that 
grounds for the application exist or that there is probable cause to 
believe that grounds for the application exist, the judge or judge trial 
referee shall issue a warrant identifying the property and naming or 
describing the person, place or thing to be searched or authorizing the 
installation and use of a tracking device and identifying the person on 
which or the property to, in or on which the tracking device is to be 
installed. The warrant shall be directed to any police officer of a 
regularly organized police department or any state police officer, to an 
inspector in the Division of Criminal Justice, to a conservation officer, 
special conservation officer or patrolman acting pursuant to section 26-
6 or to a sworn motor vehicle inspector acting under the authority of 
section 14-8. Except for a warrant for the installation and use of a 
tracking device, the warrant shall state the date and time of its issuance 
and the grounds or probable cause for its issuance and shall command 
the officer to search within a reasonable time the person, place or thing 
named, for the property specified. A warrant for the installation and use 
of a tracking device shall state the date and time of its issuance and the 
grounds or probable cause for its issuance and shall command the 
officer to complete the installation of the device within a specified  Substitute Senate Bill No. 1093 
 
Public Act No. 21-33 	13 of 21 
 
period not later than ten days after the date of its issuance and authorize 
the installation and use of the tracking device, including the collection 
of data through such tracking device, for a reasonable period of time not 
to exceed thirty days from the date the tracking device is installed. Upon 
request and a showing of good cause, a judge or judge trial referee may 
authorize the use of the tracking device for an additional period of thirty 
days. 
(e) No police officer of a regularly organized police department or 
any state police officer, an inspector in the Division of Criminal Justice, 
a conservation officer, special conservation officer or patrolman acting 
pursuant to section 26-6 or a sworn motor vehicle inspector acting under 
the authority of section 14-8, shall seek, execute or participate in the 
execution of a no-knock warrant. A search warrant authorized under 
this section shall require that an officer provide notice of such officer's 
identity, authority and purpose prior to entering the place to be 
searched for the execution of such search warrant. Prior to undertaking 
any search or seizure pursuant to the search warrant, the executing 
officer shall read and give a copy of the search warrant to the person to 
be searched or the owner of the place to be searched or, if the owner is 
not present, to any occupant of the place to be searched. If the place to 
be searched is unoccupied, the executing officer shall leave a copy of the 
search warrant suitably affixed to the place to be searched. For purposes 
of this subsection, "no-knock warrant" means a warrant authorizing 
police officers to enter certain premises without first knocking and 
announcing their presence or purpose prior to entering the place to be 
searched. 
[(e)] (f) A judge or judge trial referee may issue a warrant pursuant to 
this section for records or data that are in the actual or constructive 
possession of a foreign corporation or business entity that transacts 
business in this state, including, but not limited to, a foreign corporation 
or business entity that provides electronic communication services or  Substitute Senate Bill No. 1093 
 
Public Act No. 21-33 	14 of 21 
 
remote computing services to the public. Such a warrant may be served 
on an authorized representative of the foreign corporation or business 
entity by hand, mail, commercial delivery, facsimile or electronic 
transmission, provided proof of delivery can be established. When 
properly served with a warrant issued pursuant to this section, the 
foreign corporation or business entity shall provide to the applicant all 
records or data sought by the warrant within fourteen business days of 
being served with the warrant, unless the judge or judge trial referee 
determines that a shorter or longer period of time is necessary or 
appropriate. 
[(f)] (g) The inadvertent failure of the issuing judge or judge trial 
referee to state on the warrant the time of its issuance shall not in and of 
itself invalidate the warrant. 
Sec. 8. Section 53a-22 of the general statutes, as amended by section 
29 of public act 20-1 of the July special session and section 2 of public act 
21-4, is amended by adding subsection (h) as follows (Effective January 1, 
2022): 
(NEW) (h) In determining whether use of force by a peace officer who 
is a police officer, as defined in subsection (a) of section 29-6d, is justified 
pursuant to this section, the trier of fact may draw an unfavorable 
inference from a police officer's deliberate failure in violation of section 
29-6d, as amended by this act, to record such use of physical force. 
Sec. 9. Section 52-571k of the general statutes is repealed and the 
following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 2021): 
(a) As used in this section: 
(1) "Law enforcement unit" has the same meaning as provided in 
section 7-294a; and 
(2) "Police officer" has the same meaning as provided in section 7- Substitute Senate Bill No. 1093 
 
Public Act No. 21-33 	15 of 21 
 
294a. 
(b) No police officer, acting alone or in conspiracy with another, shall 
deprive any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws 
of this state, or of the equal privileges and immunities under the laws of 
this state, including, without limitation, the protections, privileges and 
immunities guaranteed under article first of the Constitution of the 
state. 
(c) Any person aggrieved by a violation of subsection (b) of this 
section may bring a civil action for equitable relief or damages in the 
Superior Court. A civil action brought for damages shall be triable by 
jury. 
(d) (1) In any civil action brought under this section, governmental 
immunity shall only be a defense to a claim for damages when, at the 
time of the conduct complained of, the police officer had an objectively 
good faith belief that such officer's conduct did not violate the law. 
There shall be no interlocutory appeal of a trial court's denial of the 
application of the defense of governmental immunity. Governmental 
immunity shall not be a defense in a civil action brought solely for 
equitable relief. 
(2) In any civil action brought under this section, the trier of fact may 
draw an adverse inference from a police officer's deliberate failure, in 
violation of section 29-6d, as amended by this act, to record any event 
that is relevant to such action. 
(e) In an action under this section, each municipality or law 
enforcement unit shall protect and save harmless any such police officer 
from financial loss and expense, including legal fees and costs, if any, 
arising out of any claim, demand or suit instituted against such officer 
by reason of any act undertaken by such officer while acting in the 
discharge of the officer's duties. In the event such officer has a judgment  Substitute Senate Bill No. 1093 
 
Public Act No. 21-33 	16 of 21 
 
entered against him or her for a malicious, wanton or wilful act in a 
court of law, such municipality shall be reimbursed by such officer for 
expenses it incurred in providing such defense and shall not be held 
liable to such officer for any financial loss or expense resulting from such 
act. 
(f) In any civil action brought under this section, if the court finds that 
a violation of subsection (b) of this section was deliberate, wilful or 
committed with reckless indifference, the plaintiff may be awarded 
costs and reasonable attorney's fees. 
(g) A civil action brought pursuant to this section shall be commenced 
not later than one year after the date on which the cause of action 
accrues. Any notice of claim provision set forth in the general statutes, 
including, but not limited to, the provisions of subsection (d) of section 
7-101a and subsection (a) of section 7-465 shall not apply to an action 
brought under this section. 
Sec. 10. Subdivision (2) of subsection (e) of section 54-142a of the 
general statutes, as amended by section 3 of public act 21-32, is repealed 
and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective January 1, 2023): 
(2) Convictions for the following offenses shall not be eligible for 
erasure pursuant to this subsection: 
(A) Any conviction designated as a family violence crime, as defined 
in section 46b-38a; [or] 
(B) Any conviction for an offense that is a nonviolent sexual offense 
or a sexually violent offense, each as defined in section 54-250; [.]  
(C) Any conviction for a class D felony offense that is a violation of 
section 53a-60a, 53a-60b, 53a-60c, 53a-64bb, 53a-72a, 53a-90a, 53a-103a, 
53a-181c, 53a-191, 53a-196, 53a-196f, 53a-211, 53a-216, 53a-217a, 53a-322, 
54-251, 54-252, 54-253 or 54-254 or subdivision (1) of subsection (a) of  Substitute Senate Bill No. 1093 
 
Public Act No. 21-33 	17 of 21 
 
section 53a-189a;  
(D) Any conviction for a class A misdemeanor offense that is a 
violation of section 53a-61a, 53a-64cc or 53a-323; or 
(E) Any conviction for an offense for which the defendant has not 
served or completed serving the sentence imposed for such offense, 
including any period of incarceration, special parole, parole or 
probation, unless and until the applicable time period prescribed in 
subdivision (1) of this subsection has elapsed and the defendant has 
completed serving such sentence. 
Sec. 11. Subsection (c) of section 7-294d of the general statutes is 
repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 
1, 2021): 
(c) (1) The council may refuse to renew any certificate if the holder 
fails to meet the requirements for renewal of his or her certification. 
(2) The council may cancel or revoke any certificate if: (A) The 
certificate was issued by administrative error, (B) the certificate was 
obtained through misrepresentation or fraud, (C) the holder falsified 
any document in order to obtain or renew any certificate, (D) the holder 
has been convicted of a felony, (E) the holder has been found not guilty 
of a felony by reason of mental disease or defect pursuant to section 53a-
13, (F) the holder has been convicted of a violation of section 21a-279, 
(G) the holder has been refused issuance of a certificate or similar 
authorization or has had his or her certificate or other authorization 
cancelled or revoked by another jurisdiction on grounds which would 
authorize cancellation or revocation under the provisions of this 
subdivision, (H) the holder has been found by a law enforcement unit, 
pursuant to procedures established by such unit, to have used a firearm 
in an improper manner which resulted in the death or serious physical 
injury of another person, (I) the holder has been found by a law  Substitute Senate Bill No. 1093 
 
Public Act No. 21-33 	18 of 21 
 
enforcement unit, pursuant to procedures established by such unit and 
considering guidance developed under subsection (g) of this section, to 
have engaged in conduct that undermines public confidence in law 
enforcement, including, but not limited to, discriminatory conduct, 
falsification of reports, issuances of orders that are not lawful orders or 
a violation of the Alvin W. Penn Racial Profiling Prohibition Act 
pursuant to sections 54-1l and 54-1m, provided, when evaluating any 
such conduct, the council considers such conduct engaged in while the 
holder is acting in such holder's law enforcement capacity or 
representing himself or herself to be a police officer to be more serious 
than such conduct engaged in by a holder not acting in such holder's 
law enforcement capacity or representing himself or herself to be a 
police officer; (J) the holder has been found by a law enforcement unit, 
pursuant to procedures established by such unit, to have used physical 
force on another person in a manner that is excessive or used physical 
force in a manner found to not be justifiable after an investigation 
conducted pursuant to section 51-277a, or (K) the holder has been found 
by a law enforcement unit, pursuant to procedures established by such 
unit, to have committed any act that would constitute tampering with 
or fabricating physical evidence in violation of section 53a-155, perjury 
in violation of section 53a-156 or false statement in violation of section 
53a-157b. Whenever the council believes there is a reasonable basis for 
suspension, cancellation or revocation of the certification of a police 
officer, police training school or law enforcement instructor, it shall give 
notice and an adequate opportunity for a hearing prior to such 
suspension, cancellation or revocation. Such hearing shall be conducted 
in accordance with the provisions of chapter 54. Any holder aggrieved 
by the decision of the council may appeal from such decision in 
accordance with the provisions of section 4-183. The council may cancel 
or revoke any certificate if, after a de novo review, it finds by clear and 
convincing evidence (i) a basis set forth in subparagraphs (A) to (G), 
inclusive, of this subdivision, or (ii) that the holder of the certificate 
committed an act set forth in subparagraph (H), (I), (J) or (K) of this  Substitute Senate Bill No. 1093 
 
Public Act No. 21-33 	19 of 21 
 
subdivision. In any such case where the council finds such evidence, but 
determines that the severity of an act committed by the holder of the 
certificate does not warrant cancellation or revocation of such holder's 
certificate, the council may suspend such holder's certification for a 
period of up to forty-five days and may censure such holder of the 
certificate. Any police officer or law enforcement instructor whose 
certification is cancelled or revoked pursuant to this section may 
reapply for certification no sooner than two years after the date on 
which the cancellation or revocation order becomes final. Any police 
training school whose certification is cancelled or revoked pursuant to 
this section may reapply for certification at any time after the date on 
which such order becomes final. For purposes of this subdivision, a 
lawful order is an order issued by a police officer who is in uniform or 
has identified himself or herself as a police officer to the person such 
order is issued to at the time such order is issued, and which order is 
reasonably related to the fulfillment of the duties of the police officer 
who is issuing such order, does not violate any provision of state or 
federal law and is only issued for the purposes of (I) preventing, 
detecting, investigating or stopping a crime, (II) protecting a person or 
property from harm, (III) apprehending a person suspected of a crime, 
(IV) enforcing a law, (V) regulating traffic, or (VI) assisting in emergency 
relief, including the administration of first aid. 
Sec. 12. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2021) (a) For purposes of this 
section, "criminal act" means criminal act, as defined in section 53a-224 
of the general statutes. 
(b) A person is guilty of enticing a juvenile to commit a criminal act 
if such person is twenty-three years of age or older and knowingly 
causes, encourages, solicits, recruits, intimidates or coerces a person 
under eighteen years of age to commit or participate in the commission 
of a criminal act. 
(c) Enticing a juvenile to commit a criminal act is a (1) class A  Substitute Senate Bill No. 1093 
 
Public Act No. 21-33 	20 of 21 
 
misdemeanor for first offense, and (2) class D felony for any subsequent 
offense. 
Sec. 13. (Effective from passage) (a) The Judicial Branch shall conduct a 
study to determine the feasibility of (1) decreasing the period of time 
between the arrest of a child and such child's initial court appearance, 
in order to increase the likelihood that such child will attend such 
appearance and reduce the likelihood of such child's recidivism, and (2) 
establishing a diversionary program for children who are arrested, in 
which participants shall report to a judge, juvenile probation officer or 
clinical social worker licensed pursuant to chapter 383b of the general 
statutes, on a weekly basis from the period of arrest until the 
adjudication of the matter in order to reduce the likelihood of 
recidivism. 
(b) Not later than January 1, 2022, the Judicial Branch shall report the 
findings of the study conducted pursuant to subsection (a) of this 
section, in accordance with the provisions of section 11-4a of the general 
statutes, to the joint standing committees of the General Assembly 
having cognizance of matters relating to the judiciary and children. 
Sec. 14. Subsection (d) of section 54-91c of the general statutes is 
repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective January 
1, 2023): 
(d) Upon the request of a victim, prior to the acceptance by the court 
of a plea of a defendant pursuant to a proposed plea agreement, the 
state's attorney, assistant state's attorney or deputy assistant state's 
attorney in charge of the case shall provide such victim with the terms 
of such proposed plea agreement in writing. If the terms of the proposed 
plea agreement provide for a term of imprisonment which is more than 
two years or a total effective sentence of more than a two-year term of 
imprisonment, the state's attorney, assistant state's attorney or deputy 
assistant state's attorney in charge of the case shall indicate: (1) The  Substitute Senate Bill No. 1093 
 
Public Act No. 21-33 	21 of 21 
 
maximum period of imprisonment that may apply to the defendant; (2) 
whether the defendant may be eligible to earn risk reduction credits 
pursuant to section 18-98e; [and] (3) whether the defendant may be 
eligible to apply for release on parole pursuant to section 54-125a; and 
(4) whether the defendant may be eligible for automatic erasure of such 
defendant's criminal conviction pursuant to subsection (e) of section 54-
142a, as amended by this act.