Connecticut 2022 2022 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05044 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 04/27/2022

                    OFFICE OF FISCAL ANALYSIS 
Legislative Office Building, Room 5200 
Hartford, CT 06106  (860) 240-0200 
http://www.cga.ct.gov/ofa 
sHB-5044 
AN ACT IMPLEMENTING THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET 
RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING THE USE OF OPIOID 
LITIGATION PROCEEDS. 
As Amended by House "B" (LCO 5386) 
House Calendar No.: 132  
 
Primary Analyst: ES 	4/27/22 
Contributing Analyst(s):    
 
 
 
 
OFA Fiscal Note 
 
State Impact: See Below  
Municipal Impact: Below  
Explanation 
The bill establishes the Opioid Settlement Fund, a separate non-
lapsing fund, as a mechanism for the state to receive opioid litigation 
proceeds finalized after 7/1/21. Expenses made from the fund must be 
used prospectively and only for specified substance use disorder 
abatement purposes.   
The bill results in a cost to the Department of Mental Health and 
Addiction Services (DMHAS) of at least $250,000 associated with a 
Behavioral Health Program Manager and Administrative Assistant (and 
related fringe benefits) required to manage the Committee. Additional 
staffing and support costs may be incurred to carry out the provisions 
of the bill. Costs may be supported by the Opioid Settlement Fund or 
the General Fund. 
The bill requires the Treasurer to annually report on fund balance, 
investments, and earned income for the Opioid Settlement Fund. This is 
not anticipated to result in a cost, as the Treasurer has sufficient 
expertise to create such reports if the monies of the fund are invested 
alongside other cash balances of the state, such as the short-term  2022HB-05044-R01-FN.DOCX 	Page 2 of 2 
 
 
investment fund. 
For context, Connecticut is part of a recently approved $26 billion 
multistate opioid settlement agreement with various prescription drug 
manufacturers. Of that amount, the state is expected to receive 
approximately $300 million over 18 years; municipalities will receive 
15%, or 45 million collectively, of the state’s allocation. As such, this is 
anticipated to result in a significant revenue gain to the state and 
municipalities associated with settlement revenue. 
House "B" strikes the language in the underlying bill and the 
associated impact and results in the fiscal impact described above. 
The Out Years 
The annualized ongoing fiscal impact is dependent on opioid 
litigation settlements and associated proceeds.