Connecticut 2022 2022 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05373 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 07/22/2022

                    O F F I C E O F L E G I S L A T I V E R E S E A R C H 
P U B L I C A C T S U M M A R Y 
 
  	Page 1 
PA 22-63—sHB 5373 
Veterans' Affairs Committee 
Judiciary Committee 
 
AN ACT ESTABLISHING CONCURRENT JURISDICT ION WITH THE 
UNITED STATES OVER O FFENSES COMMITTED BY MINORS ON 
FEDERAL MILITARY INS TALLATIONS IN THIS STATE 
 
SUMMARY: This act requires the state to exercise concurrent jurisdiction with the 
United States in matters where (1) a minor has violated federal law while on a U.S. 
Department of Defense (DOD) military installation, (2) the installation is located 
on land that the state previously ceded exclusive jurisdiction over to the federal 
government, and (3) the U.S. Attorney or U.S. District Court for the state waives 
exclusive jurisdiction over that matter.  
Existing law allows the governor to accept back, on behalf of the state, 
concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction over these and other areas where the state has 
ceded exclusive jurisdiction to the federal government.  
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2022 
 
BACKGROUND 
 
Exclusive and Concurrent Jurisdiction  
 
When the federal government has exclusive jurisdiction over land, it means the 
laws and statutes governing those areas are those of the federal government, not the 
state.  
Concurrent jurisdiction means both the state and the federal government 
generally have the independent authority to apply and enforce their laws, so long 
as there is no interference with the federal government’s use of federal land. 
 
Federal Authority to Establish Concurrent Jurisdiction Over Military 
Installations  
 
DOD cannot prosecute individuals who are not subject to the Uniform Code of 
Military Justice (UCMJ), such as minors. As a result, any prosecutions of minors for 
crimes they commit on military installations over which the federal government has 
exclusive jurisdiction generally must occur under federal law. When concurrent 
jurisdiction is established, states’ juvenile courts generally may hear and decide on 
juvenile offenses that occur on these military installations. 
Federal law authorizes the secretaries of the military departments (Army, Navy, 
and Air Force) to relinquish to a state full or partial jurisdiction over lands or 
interests under the secretary’s control in that state. They may do so (1) by filing a 
notice of relinquishment with the governor, which takes effect upon the governor’s 
acceptance of it, or (2) as the state’s laws provide (10 U.S.C. § 2683).