Connecticut 2022 2022 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05382 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 03/29/2022

                     
Researcher: AR 	Page 1 	3/29/22 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
sHB 5382  
 
AN ACT CONCERNING THE INSURANCE HOLDING COMPANY 
ACT.  
 
SUMMARY 
Existing law allows the insurance commissioner to supervise and 
review insurers doing business in Connecticut that are affiliated with an 
insurance holding company system. By law, an “insurance holding 
company system” is two or more affiliated people or companies, one of 
which is an insurance company. In practice, this allows the insurance 
commissioner to require that a holding company system take actions to 
reduce “enterprise risk,” which is a risk to an insurer or its affiliates that 
is likely to impact the insurer’s or holding company’s financial condition 
or liquidity.  
This bill generally adopts the National Association of Insurance 
Commissioners (NAIC) amendments to the Model Insurance Holding 
Company System Regulatory Act on group capital calculations and 
liquidity stress tests for insurers affiliated with an insurance holding 
company. These calculations and test results give regulators insight on 
insurance holding company systems’ financial health.  
In practice, these amendments are necessary to conform to 
international agreements on “worldwide supervisors,” which are states 
and jurisdictions that supervise insurers with affiliates in certain 
international reciprocal jurisdictions (e.g., insurance groups domiciled 
in Connecticut with affiliates in the European Union or the United 
Kingdom). Under these agreements, Connecticut must adopt certain 
standards together with other states. 
The bill also incorporates NAIC amendments that ensure a domestic 
insurance company in receivership that is associated with an insurance 
company holding system continues to receive essential services from an  2022HB-05382-R000171-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: AR 	Page 2 	3/29/22 
 
affiliate that it has contracted with. It: 
1. requires insurers that are in hazardous financial condition and 
are part of an insurance holding company to secure money or a 
bond that covers certain existing obligations and 
2. subjects companies affiliated with, and that have certain 
contractual obligations to, an insurer in receivership to the 
receiver’s authority in certain circumstances. 
With respect to insurers that are part of an insurance holding 
company systems, the bill, in line with NAIC model language, also 
requires agreements within an insurance company holding system to (1) 
keep an insurer’s data accessible, identifiable, and segregated and (2) 
maintain as the insurer’s exclusive property any of its premiums or 
funds held by an affiliate.   
In line with NAIC amendments, the bill integrates third party 
consultants into certain provisions of existing law that govern how, and 
with whom, NAIC can share certain confidential information. 
The bill also expands the definition of “internationally active 
insurance group” for the purposes of insurance holding company 
regulation. Current law defines an “internationally active insurance 
group” as an insurance group that, among other things, writes (1) 
premiums in at least three countries and (2) at least 10% of its gross 
premiums outside the United States. The bill includes in “gross 
premiums” for the purpose of this calculation, administrative service 
fees, associated expenses, and claim payments.  
Finally, the bill makes technical and conforming changes.  
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2022 
GROUP CAPITAL CALCULATIONS 
By law, insurers doing business in Connecticut as part of an insurance 
holding company system must register with the Connecticut insurance 
commissioner.   2022HB-05382-R000171-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: AR 	Page 3 	3/29/22 
 
The bill requires the ultimate controlling person of these insurers to 
file an annual group capital calculation by June 1 annually, and 
concurrently with their registration. The group capital calculation must 
be filed with the lead state commissioner, as determined by certain 
NAIC procedures (e.g., the commissioner of the state in which the 
holding company is domiciled).  (The group capital calculation 
requirement is a financial tool that assists state insurance regulators 
identify risks that may come from from a holding company system.) 
The report must be completed using the NAIC Group Capital 
Calculation Instructions and Reporting Template.  
Exemptions 
The bill exempts from these group capital calculation filing 
requirements an insurance company holding system that: 
1. (a) has only one insurer in its company structure, (b) only writes 
business and is only licensed in its domestic state, and (c) 
assumes no business from any other insurer; 
2. is subject to the group capital requirements applicable to an 
insurance group that owns a, presumably, Federal Reserve 
Board-supervised depository institution (in which case the bill 
requires the lead state commissioner to request the applicable 
capital requirements from the Board; and the insurer loses the 
exemption if information sharing agreements prevent the Board 
from disclosing them);  
3. has a non-U.S. group-wide supervisor from a reciprocal 
jurisdiction that recognizes the U.S. regulatory approach; or 
4. (a) provides information to the lead state commissioner, through 
the group-wide supervisor, that meets certain NAIC financial 
standards and accreditation requirements and that the 
supervisor deems satisfactory to allow the lead state 
commissioner to comply with a specified NAIC group 
supervision approach and (b) whose non-U.S. group-wide 
supervisor that is not in a reciprocal jurisdiction recognizes and  2022HB-05382-R000171-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: AR 	Page 4 	3/29/22 
 
accepts, as the lead state commissioner specifies in regulation, the 
group capital calculation as the world-wide group capital 
assessment for U.S. insurance groups that operate in that 
jurisdiction.  
The bill requires the lead state commissioner to require the group 
capital calculation for the U.S. operation of any non-U.S. based 
insurance holding company system if, after consultation with other 
supervisors or officials, the lead state commissioner determines it is 
appropriate for prudent oversight, solvency monitoring, or ensuring 
market competitiveness. The lead state commissioner may require these 
regardless of the two exemptions for insurance holding company 
systems with non-U.S. group-wide supervisors listed above (items 3 and 
4 above).  
The bill also gives the lead state commissioner the discretion to 
exempt the ultimate controlling person from filing the annual group 
calculation, or to accept a limited group capital filing report in 
accordance with criteria the commissioner specifies in regulation.  
If the commissioner determines an insurance holding company 
system no longer meets one of the exemptions above, it must file the 
group capital calculation at the next annual filing, unless the lead state 
commissioner gives an extension based on reasonable grounds.  
LIQUIDITY STRESS TESTS 
Under the bill, the ultimate controlling person of every insurer 
subject to registration (i.e., insurers affiliated with insurance holding 
companies) that is also scoped into the NAIC liquidity stress test 
framework for that year must file the results of the specified year’s 
liquidity stress test with the lead state commissioner.  (The liquidity 
stress test provides state insurance regulators with information on key 
macro prudential risk.)  
The NAIC liquidity stress test framework includes scope criteria 
applicable to a specific data year. The bill specifies that these scope 
criteria are reviewed at least annually by the NAIC Financial Stability  2022HB-05382-R000171-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: AR 	Page 5 	3/29/22 
 
Task Force (“task force”), and any changes to the framework or to the 
data year take effect on January 1 of the following year.  
The bill requires insurers meeting at least one threshold of the scope 
criteria to be scoped into the NAIC liquidity stress test framework, 
unless the lead state commissioner, in consultation with the task force, 
determines otherwise. Correspondingly, insurers that do not trigger at 
least one scope criteria threshold are scoped out, unless the lead state 
commissioner in consultation with the task force, determines otherwise.  
The performance of, and filing of the results from, a specific year’s 
liquidity stress test must comply with (1) the applicable NAIC liquidity 
stress test framework instructions and reporting guidelines and (2) any 
lead state commissioner determinations made in consultation with the 
task force.  
GROUP CAPITAL CALCULATION AND LIQUIDITY STRESS TEST 
CONFIDENTIALITY 
The bill makes confidential the information reported and provided to 
the lead state commissioner by an insurance holding company system 
(including one supervised by the Federal Reserve Board) for group 
capital calculations and liquidity stress tests. Specifically, the 
information is: 
1. confidential and privileged; 
2. not subject to disclosure under the state’s Freedom of 
Information Act; and 
3. not subject to subpoena, discovery, or admissible in any civil 
action. 
The bill specifies these group capital calculations and the resulting 
group capital ratios, and the liquidity stress tests and its results and 
supporting disclosures, are only regulatory tools for assessing group 
risks and capital adequacy and are not intended to rank insurers or 
insurance holding company systems generally.  
INSURANCE COMPANIES IN HAZARDOUS FINANCIAL CONDITION  2022HB-05382-R000171-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: AR 	Page 6 	3/29/22 
 
The bill adds provisions related to insurance companies that have to 
register as part of an insurance holding company system that the 
commissioner determines are in hazardous financial condition or in a 
condition that would otherwise be grounds for supervision, 
conservation, or delinquency, under applicable existing law or 
regulations.  
Under the bill, the commissioner may require these companies to 
secure and maintain, a (1) deposit, to be held by the commissioner, or 
(2) bond, as the company determines. The deposit or bond must protect 
the insurance company for the duration of the contracts, agreements, or 
conditions that are causing the hazardous financial condition.  
In determining whether the bond or deposit is required, the 
commissioner must consider whether the company’s affiliates are able 
to fulfill its contracts or agreements if the company were liquidated. The 
commissioner sets the bond or deposit amount, which cannot exceed the 
value of the contracts or agreements in any one year. He may also 
specify which contracts or agreements the bond or deposit must cover. 
DATA, RECORD, AND PREMIUM OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL 
The bill specifies that all of an insurance company’s records and data 
held by an affiliate remain property of the insurance company and are 
subject to the company’s control. The records must be identifiable and 
segregated (or readily capable of segregation) from all other persons’ 
records and all of the affiliate’s data. Under the bill, an insurer should 
not pay to segregate commingled records and data. 
At the insurer’s request, the affiliate must allow the receiver to have: 
1. a complete set of any records about the insurer’s business,  
2. access to the operating systems where the data is maintained, and 
3. software that runs the systems (either by assuming the licensing 
agreements or otherwise). 
The bill also restricts the affiliate’s use of this data if it is not operating  2022HB-05382-R000171-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: AR 	Page 7 	3/29/22 
 
the insurer’s business.  
Under the bill, the affiliate must provide a waiver of any landlord lien 
or other encumbrance to give the insurer access to all records and data 
in the event the affiliate defaults on a lease or other agreement.  
Additionally, premiums or other funds that belong to the insurer that 
are collected or held by an affiliate are the insurer’s exclusive property, 
and subject to its control.  The bill specifies that any rights to offsets of 
amounts due to or from an insurer or affiliate are governed by existing 
insurer receivership laws if the insurer goes into receivership. 
REHABILITATOR OR LIQUIDATOR’S AUTHORITY OVER AN 
AFFILIATE 
By law, an insurer that intends to contract with an affiliate for certain 
purposes must notify the commissioner first. Under the bill, an affiliate 
that is party to a management agreement, service contract, tax allocation 
agreement, or cost-sharing arrangement for which the insurer must give 
prior notice to the commissioner is also subject to the: 
1. jurisdiction of any rehabilitation or liquidation order against the 
insurer and 
2. authority of any rehabilitator or liquidator appointed under 
existing law to interpret, enforce, and oversee the affiliate’s 
contractual obligations. 
The commissioner can require an agreement or contract to specify 
that the affiliate consents to this authority. These provisions apply to 
contracts or agreements under which the affiliate performs services for 
the insurer that: 
1. are an integral part of the insurer’s operations, including 
management, administration, accounting, data processing, 
marketing, underwriting, claims handling, investment, or similar 
functions, or 
2. are essential to the insurer’s ability to fulfil its obligations under 
insurance policies.   2022HB-05382-R000171-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: AR 	Page 8 	3/29/22 
 
SHARING INFORMATION WITH THIRD PARTY CONSULTANTS 
Existing law allows the Connecticut insurance commissioner to 
acquire from and share with certain parties confidential information 
related to regulatory reports and insurer oversight, under certain 
conditions. Among others, current law allows him to acquire and share 
this information with NAIC and its affiliates or subsidiaries. The bill 
instead allows this sharing with NAIC and any third-party consultants 
the commissioner designates.  
Existing law requires the Connecticut insurance commissioner, prior 
to acquiring or sharing information, to enter into agreements that 
specify procedures for maintaining the information’s confidentiality. 
The bill also requires these written agreements to: 
1. require the recipient to agree in writing to maintain the 
confidentiality and privileged status of the documents, materials, 
or other information and has verified in writing their legal 
authority to do so (existing law already requires this to be 
affirmed in writing before the commissioner shares information);  
2. prohibit NAIC or third-party consultants the commissioner 
designates from storing information on a permanent database 
after the underlying analysis is completed, excluding certain 
documents related to the liquidity stress tests; and 
3. for certain documents related to the liquidity stress tests and only 
in the case of an agreement with a third-party consultant, provide 
for notice of the consultant’s identity to the applicable insurer.  
COMMITTEE ACTION 
Insurance and Real Estate Committee 
Joint Favorable Substitute 
Yea 16 Nay 0 (03/17/2022)