Connecticut House Bill HB05463

Connecticut 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/11/22
• Refer: 3/11/22

Caption

An Act Concerning The Authority Of The Office Of The Attorney General To Bring An Action Against A Seller Who Engages In Price Gouging During A Disaster Or Emergency.

Impact

If enacted, HB 5463 will amend existing statutes to allow the Attorney General to take legal action against sellers who violate the pricing regulations during declared disasters or emergencies. This includes not only price increases that are deemed unfair but also establishes that price adjustments during normal business fluctuations are permissible. The bill is designed to deter predatory pricing practices by holding sellers accountable, thereby potentially lowering instances of price gouging in the state during times of crisis.

Summary

House Bill 5463, titled 'An Act Concerning The Authority Of The Office Of The Attorney General To Bring An Action Against A Seller Who Engages In Price Gouging During A Disaster Or Emergency,' aims to strengthen the enforcement powers of the Attorney General in addressing price gouging during emergencies. The bill defines key terms related to retail pricing, including the concept of 'unconscionably excessive price', which refers to price increases that significantly exceed prior prices without justification due to increased costs of goods or services. This legislation is proposed to provide better protection to consumers during critical times when essential goods may be priced unfairly high.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 5463 revolve around the balance between protecting consumers and the implications for businesses, particularly small retailers. Supporters argue that the bill is essential for consumer protection during emergencies, asserting that price gouging is unethical and can lead to significant harm for vulnerable populations. Opponents, however, express concerns that the bill may impede legitimate price adjustments necessary for covering increased operational costs associated with disasters, asserting that it could disproportionately affect smaller businesses unable to absorb such regulatory burdens.