Connecticut 2022 2022 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00001 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 04/28/2022

                    OFFICE OF FISCAL ANALYSIS 
Legislative Office Building, Room 5200 
Hartford, CT 06106  (860) 240-0200 
http://www.cga.ct.gov/ofa 
sSB-1 
AN ACT CONCERNING CHILDHOOD MENTAL AND PHYSICAL 
HEALTH SERVICES IN SCHOOLS. 
AMENDMENT 
LCO No.: 5715 
File Copy No.: 641 
Senate Calendar No.: 456  
 
Primary Analyst: SB 	4/28/22 
Contributing Analyst(s):  	(FN) 
 
 
 
 
OFA Fiscal Note 
See Fiscal Note Details  
Section 1 results in a significant cost to the Office of Early Childhood 
(OEC) to establish and administer a wage supplement and enhancement 
grant program for early childhood education program operators and 
child care services providers, in FY 23.  
The cost to the state for such grants is dependent on the parameters 
of the program, including eligibility requirements, to be established by 
OEC. The amendment requires that 70% of the appropriation for such 
grants support operators and providers that do not receive state funding 
or state financial assistance, and 30% of the appropriation must be used 
to provide grants to operators and providers that do receive state 
assistance.  Town-based programs could experience a revenue gain 
associated with such grants. Funding may be used to support 
programmatic or administrative needs of providers, but priority will be 
given to those that will use the grant funds exclusively to supplement 
employee salaries. The grant program could apply to more than 19,000 
early child care provider employees. 
Section 2 increases the child care center rate for infant and toddler 
care to $13,500 in FY 23, resulting in an increased cost of $7.8 million for 
existing slots. The amendment also requires OEC to enter into contracts 
for the purpose of expanding the number of infant and toddler spaces,  2022SB-00001-R00LCO05715-FNA.DOCX 	Page 2 of 5 
 
 
which would also be funded at the new $13,500 annual rate per slot. 
The amendment also results in additional OEC staffing costs of up to 
$340,000 (with associated fringe costs of $137,800) to administer the 
wage supplement and enhancement grant program as well as support 
the expansion of infant and toddler seats. 
Sections 3-5 result in significant costs to the State Department of 
Education (SDE) associated with: (1) developing, distributing, and 
analyzing a survey of each local and regional board of education 
concerning the employment of school social workers, school 
psychologists, school counselors and school nurses; and (2) the creation 
of a grant program to local and regional boards of education associated 
with hiring and retention of these workers. SDE does not currently have 
the funding available to complete these requirements.  
SDE would require one full time position to implement the survey 
requirements, resulting in additional personnel costs of $90,000 and 
corresponding fringe benefit costs of $36,477 annually, beginning in FY 
23. 
The cost of the grant program would depend on the scope of the 
program, and the amount of each award, but is anticipated to be over $1 
million annually beginning in FY 24, or until the program is no longer 
operational 
Section 6 requires SDE to study the feasibility of creating a temporary 
human services permit, which results in no fiscal impact as the 
department has sufficient expertise to carry out the study.  
Sections 7-9 authorize a school nurse, or in the absence of a school 
nurse, a qualified school employee, to maintain opioid antagonists to 
administer emergency first aid to a student who is experiencing an 
opioid-related drug overdose. The bill requires a school nurse or 
principal to select multiple qualified school employees to administer an 
opioid antagonist, and at least one such employee must be on school 
grounds during regular school hours when the school nurse is not there.  2022SB-00001-R00LCO05715-FNA.DOCX 	Page 3 of 5 
 
 
This could result in additional costs to local and regional school districts, 
if a school must pay an employee to stay additional hours outside of 
their normally scheduled hours, to cover the requirements of the bill. 
The cost to a district would be dependent on the number of hours a 
school nurse is away during normal school hours and those hours are 
outside the normal schedule of the qualified employees. The bill allows 
local and regional school districts to maintain opioid antagonists, which 
could result in an additional cost associated with purchasing emergency 
kits of approximately $22 - $60 per kit. If a district were to purchase 100 
kits, the cost would range from $2,220 to $6,000.  
Sections 10 and 11 create taskforces and do not result in a fiscal 
impact. 
Section 12 results in a cost to the Department of Public Health to 
administer a school-based health center expansion grant program in FY 
23. It is anticipated that this grant could result in annual costs of 
approximately $590,000.  
Section 13 results in a potential cost to SDE in FY 23 to provide 
additional support and assistance to districts participating in the 
Learner Engagement and Attendance Program (LEAP), as SDE does not 
currently have the staff or resources available. The potential cost would 
be dependent upon the scope of the additional support and assistance. 
Section 14 results in a potential cost beginning in FY 23 to various 
local and regional boards of education associated with at least 30 
minutes of uninterrupted lunch time for certified staff. The cost would 
be dependent upon any substitute coverage required to complete the 
requirements in the amendment.  
Section 16 establishes a minority teacher candidate scholarship 
program for students from priority school districts. This will result in an 
additional cost to the state beginning in FY 23 as SDE does not have 
funding available. The scope of the cost would be dependent upon the 
number of scholarships awarded and the amount per award but is 
anticipated to be significant.  2022SB-00001-R00LCO05715-FNA.DOCX 	Page 4 of 5 
 
 
Sections 17-22 rename the minority teacher recruitment task force 
and make various procedural, conforming and technical changes that 
do not result in a fiscal impact. 
Section 23 results in a minimal cost to the State Department of 
Education (SDE) associated with an additional durational part-time staff 
person in FY 23, with a corresponding salary of approximately $50,000, 
to review teacher certification statutes and regulations, and make 
recommendations on any obsolete provisions and requirements that 
create a barrier to teacher recruitment and retention. SDE does not 
currently have the staff available to complete the requirements within 
the bill.  
Section 24 establishes a career and technical pathways instructor 
permit, which does not have a fiscal impact.   
Section 25 allows, beginning with the 2024-25 school year, remote 
learning for students in grades kindergarten through 12. This could 
result in a potential cost to local and regional school districts beginning 
in FY 25 if additional virtual or on-line materials and equipment must 
be purchased to accommodate students opting to participate in a remote 
learning model. However, the bill is permissive; local and regional 
school districts are not mandated to participate. 
Section 26 adjusts the responsibilities of the State Education Resource 
Center (SERC).  If the center is not currently providing services in line 
with its added responsibilities, then there may be an additional cost 
(dependent on the level of new responsibilities required).  This section 
allows SERC to lease property without the approval of a state agency, 
which may result in either a savings or cost to SERC.  
Section 27 makes Guilford eligible to participate in the Open Choice 
Program, beginning with the 2022-23 school year. This results in a cost 
to the state and a corresponding revenue gain to Guilford starting in FY 
23. However, it is anticipated that in FY 23, the cost and corresponding 
revenue gain would be less than $50,000, and the Open Choice account 
has the funds available to cover this additional expense.   2022SB-00001-R00LCO05715-FNA.DOCX 	Page 5 of 5 
 
 
Section 28 designates the first $500,000 of excess Open Choice 
funding for SERC to use to offer professional development to teachers 
and other school personnel in districts receiving Open Choice students. 
Additionally, it designates that any such amount over $500,000 will be 
used for wrap around services for students participating in the program.  
Section 29 establishes the state teacher shortage and retention task 
force, which is not anticipated to result in a fiscal impact.  
Section 30 requires the Department of Correction, in consultation 
with the SDE, to conduct a study concerning the funding and costs of 
United School District #1, resulting in no fiscal impact to the state.  The 
agencies have the capacity and expertise to conduct the study. 
Section 31 makes a procedural change that does not result in a fiscal 
impact.  
Sections 32-33 adjust the school curriculum beginning July 1, 2025, 
resulting in a cost to the state and a mandate (cost) to local and regional 
school districts.  The FY 23 budget approved by the Appropriations 
Committee provides one position ($100,000 salary and $40,530 fringe 
benefits costs) dedicated to inclusion and diversity to aid in this and 
other related endeavors.  Local and regional school districts will 
experience costs in FY 26 to include this new item in the 
curriculum.  Costs will be dependent upon the size of the district, 
whether the district already includes the above studies and the extent 
free existing materials from the Internet and other sources can be 
used.  It is anticipated that no district will experience costs in excess of 
$50,000. 
The preceding Fiscal Impact statement is prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely 
for the purposes of information, summarization and explanation and does not represent the intent of the General 
Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose. In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of 
informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge. Whenever applicable, agency data is 
consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any 
specific department.