OFFICE OF FISCAL ANALYSIS
Legislative Office Building, Room 5200
Hartford, CT 06106 (860) 240-0200
http://www.cga.ct.gov/ofa
sSB-1
AN ACT CONCERNING CHILDHOOD MENTAL AND PHYSICAL
HEALTH SERVICES IN SCHOOLS.
As Amended by Senate "A" (LCO 5715)
House Calendar No.: 498
Senate Calendar No.: 456
Primary Analyst: SB 4/29/22
Contributing Analyst(s):
Reviewer: JS
OFA Fiscal Note
State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 23 $ FY 24 $
Various State Agencies GF - See Below See Below See Below
Note: GF=General Fund
Municipal Impact:
Municipalities Effect FY 23 $ FY 24 $
Various Municipalities See Below See Below See Below
The bill makes various changes regarding early childhood programs,
and childhood mental and physical health services in schools. The fiscal
impact of the bill is described below.
Section 1 results in a significant cost to the Office of Early Childhood
(OEC) to establish and administer a wage supplement and enhancement
grant program for early childhood education program operators and
child care services providers, in FY 23.
The cost to the state for such grants is dependent on the parameters
of the program, including eligibility requirements, to be established by
OEC. The bill requires that 70% of the appropriation for such grants
support operators and providers that do not receive state funding or
state financial assistance, and 30% of the appropriation must be used to
provide grants to operators and providers that do receive state 2022SB-00001-R01-FN.DOCX Page 2 of 6
assistance. Town-based programs could experience a revenue gain
associated with such grants. Funding may be used to support
programmatic or administrative needs of providers, but priority will be
given to those that will use the grant funds exclusively to supplement
employee salaries. The grant program could apply to more than 19,000
early child care provider employees.
Section 2 increases the child care center rate for infant and toddler
care to $13,500 in FY 23, resulting in an increased cost of $7.8 million for
existing slots. The bill also requires OEC to enter into contracts for the
purpose of expanding the number of infant and toddler spaces, which
would also be funded at the new $13,500 annual rate per slot.
The bill also results in additional OEC staffing costs of up to $340,000
(with associated fringe costs of $137,800) to administer the wage
supplement and enhancement grant program as well as support the
expansion of infant and toddler slots.
Sections 3-5 result in significant costs to the State Department of
Education (SDE) associated with: (1) developing, distributing, and
analyzing a survey of each local and regional board of education
concerning the employment of school social workers, school
psychologists, school counselors and school nurses; and (2) the creation
of a grant program to local and regional boards of education associated
with hiring and retention of these workers. SDE does not currently have
the funding available to complete these requirements.
SDE would require one full time position to implement the survey
requirements, resulting in additional personnel costs of $90,000 and
corresponding fringe benefit costs of $36,477 annually, beginning in FY
23.
The cost of the grant program would depend on the scope of the
program, and the amount of each award, but is anticipated to be over $1
million annually beginning in FY 24, or until the program is no longer
operational. 2022SB-00001-R01-FN.DOCX Page 3 of 6
Section 6 requires SDE to study the feasibility of creating a temporary
human services permit, which results in no fiscal impact as the
department has sufficient expertise to carry out the study.
Sections 7-9 authorize a school nurse, or in the absence of a school
nurse, a qualified school employee, to maintain opioid antagonists to
administer emergency first aid to a student who is experiencing an
opioid-related drug overdose. The bill requires a school nurse or
principal to select multiple qualified school employees to administer an
opioid antagonist, and at least one such employee must be on school
grounds during regular school hours when the school nurse is not there.
This could result in additional costs to local and regional school districts,
if a school must pay an employee to stay additional hours outside of
their normally scheduled hours, to cover the requirements of the bill.
The cost to a district would be dependent on the number of hours a
school nurse is away during normal school hours and those hours are
outside the normal schedule of the qualified employees. The bill allows
local and regional school districts to maintain opioid antagonists, which
could result in an additional cost associated with purchasing emergency
kits of approximately $22 - $60 per kit. If a district were to purchase 100
kits, the cost would range from $2,220 to $6,000.
Sections 10 and 11 create taskforces and do not result in a fiscal
impact.
Section 12 results in a cost to the Department of Public Health to
administer a school-based health center expansion grant program in FY
23. It is anticipated that this grant could result in annual costs of
approximately $590,000.
Section 13 results in a potential cost to SDE in FY 23 to provide
additional support and assistance to districts participating in the
Learner Engagement and Attendance Program (LEAP), as SDE does not
currently have the staff or resources available. The potential cost would
be dependent upon the scope of the additional support and assistance.
Section 14 results in a potential cost beginning in FY 23 to various 2022SB-00001-R01-FN.DOCX Page 4 of 6
local and regional boards of education associated with at least 30
minutes of uninterrupted lunch time for certified staff. The cost would
be dependent upon any substitute coverage required to complete the
requirements in the bill.
Section 16 establishes a minority teacher candidate scholarship
program for students from priority school districts. This will result in an
additional cost to the state beginning in FY 23 as SDE does not have
funding available. The scope of the cost would be dependent upon the
number of scholarships awarded and the amount per award but is
anticipated to be significant.
Sections 17-22 rename the minority teacher recruitment task force
and make various procedural, conforming and technical changes that
do not result in a fiscal impact.
Section 23 results in a minimal cost to the State Department of
Education (SDE) associated with an additional durational part-time staff
person in FY 23, with a corresponding salary of approximately $50,000,
to review teacher certification statutes and regulations, and make
recommendations on any obsolete provisions and requirements that
create a barrier to teacher recruitment and retention. SDE does not
currently have the staff available to complete the requirements within
the bill.
Section 24 establishes a career and technical pathways instructor
permit, which does not have a fiscal impact.
Section 25 allows, beginning with the 2024-25 school year, remote
learning for students in grades kindergarten through 12. This could
result in a potential cost to local and regional school districts beginning
in FY 25 if additional virtual or on-line materials and equipment must
be purchased to accommodate students opting to participate in a remote
learning model. However, the bill is permissive; local and regional
school districts are not mandated to participate.
Section 26 adjusts the responsibilities of the State Education Resource 2022SB-00001-R01-FN.DOCX Page 5 of 6
Center (SERC). If the center is not currently providing services in line
with its added responsibilities, then there may be an additional cost
(dependent on the level of new responsibilities required). This section
allows SERC to lease property without the approval of a state agency,
which may result in either a savings or cost to SERC.
Section 27 makes Guilford eligible to participate in the Open Choice
Program, beginning with the 2022-23 school year. This results in a cost
to the state and a corresponding revenue gain to Guilford starting in FY
23. However, it is anticipated that in FY 23, the cost and corresponding
revenue gain would be less than $50,000, and the Open Choice account
has the funds available to cover this additional expense.
Section 28 designates the first $500,000 of excess Open Choice
funding for SERC to use to offer professional development to teachers
and other school personnel in districts receiving Open Choice students.
Additionally, it designates that any such amount over $500,000 will be
used for wrap around services for students participating in the program.
Section 29 establishes the state teacher shortage and retention task
force, which is not anticipated to result in a fiscal impact.
Section 30 requires the Department of Correction, in consultation
with the SDE, to conduct a study concerning the funding and costs of
Unified School District #1, resulting in no fiscal impact to the state. The
agencies have the capacity and expertise to conduct the study.
Section 31 makes a procedural change that does not result in a fiscal
impact.
Sections 32-33 adjust the school curriculum beginning July 1, 2025,
resulting in a cost to the state and a mandate (cost) to local and regional
school districts. The FY 23 budget approved by the Appropriations
Committee provides one position ($100,000 salary and $40,530 fringe
benefits costs) dedicated to inclusion and diversity to aid in this and
other related endeavors. Local and regional school districts will
experience costs in FY 26 to include this new item in the 2022SB-00001-R01-FN.DOCX Page 6 of 6
curriculum. Costs will be dependent upon the size of the district,
whether the district already includes the above studies and the extent
free existing materials from the Internet and other sources can be
used. It is anticipated that no district will experience costs in excess of
$50,000.
Senate "A" removed the original fiscal note and replaced it with the
fiscal impacts described above.
The Out Years
The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would
continue into the future subject to inflation.
explanation and does not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional
knowledge. Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not
necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.