Connecticut 2022 2022 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00364 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 04/20/2022

                    OFFICE OF FISCAL ANALYSIS 
Legislative Office Building, Room 5200 
Hartford, CT 06106  (860) 240-0200 
http://www.cga.ct.gov/ofa 
SB-364 
AN ACT CONCERNING HEALTH INSURANCE. 
AMENDMENT 
LCO No.: 4730 
File Copy No.: 315 
Senate Calendar No.: 234  
 
Primary Analyst: MP 	4/19/22 
Contributing Analyst(s):  	(FN) 
 
 
 
 
OFA Fiscal Note 
See Fiscal Note Details  
The amendment strikes the underlying bill and its associated fiscal 
impact. 
 The amendment may result in a cost to the state employee and retiree 
health plan, as well as municipalities that participate in the Partnership 
Plan, and is anticipated to result in a cost to fully insured municipalities 
by creating a rebuttal presumption under the adverse determination 
and utilization review processes that a service ordered by a physician is 
medically necessary.  
The amendment places the burden of proof upon a carrier that a 
service ordered by a physician is not medically necessary, which 
contrasts with current practice. To the extent the amendment results in 
services being rendered that otherwise would have been denied, there 
is a cost 1) to the state for the state employee and retiree health plan and 
2) to fully insured municipalities in the form of higher premiums.  It is 
unclear how the amendment may affect the state employee and retiree 
health plan, as a utilization standard was established pursuant to the 
2017 State Employees Bargaining Agent Coalition (SEBAC) agreement 
and the state plan is governed by the federal Employee Retirement 
Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The cost to fully insured 
municipalities would be reflected in premiums for plan years adopted  2022SB-00364-R00LCO04730-FNA.DOCX 	Page 2 of 2 
 
 
after January 1, 2023.  
The amendment also results in a cost for certain fully insured 
municipal plans that currently require step therapy for conditions 
specified in the amendment, to the extent the amendment results in 
higher prescription drug costs that are passed on in the form of higher 
premiums. The amendment’s provisions prohibiting step therapy in 
certain cases do not result in a fiscal impact to the state employee and 
retiree health plan or municipalities that participate in the Partnership 
Plan, as step therapy is not required by the plans. 
The preceding Fiscal Impact statement is prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely 
for the purposes of information, summarization and explanation and does not represent the intent of the General 
Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose. In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of 
informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge. Whenever applicable, agency data is 
consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any 
specific department.