Connecticut 2022 2022 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00416 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 04/06/2022

                     
Researcher: JKL 	Page 1 	4/6/22 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
sSB 416  
 
AN ACT PROMOTING COMPETITION IN CONTRACTS BETWEEN 
HEALTH CARRIERS AND HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS.  
 
SUMMARY 
This bill prohibits certain anticompetitive provisions in health care 
contracts. It also authorizes the insurance commissioner to adopt 
implementing regulations. 
Specifically, the bill prohibits health insurance carriers, health care 
providers, and health plan administrators (i.e., third-party 
administrators or TPAs), or their agents or other entities acting on their 
behalf, from offering, soliciting, requesting, amending, renewing, or 
entering into a health care contract that includes, directly or indirectly, 
(1) all-or-nothing, anti-steering, or anti-tiering clauses or (2) any other 
anticompetitive clause the commissioner adopts in accordance with the 
Uniform Administrative Procedure Act (i.e., in regulations). 
Under the bill, any contract, procedure, or agreement with one of 
these clauses is null and void, except other clauses of a contract remain 
in effect for the duration of the contract term. 
By law, anyone violating a provision of Title 38a of the general 
statutes for which no other penalty is provided is subject to a fine of up 
to $15,000 (CGS § 38a-2). 
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 2023 
DEFINITIONS 
All-Or-Nothing Clause 
Under the bill, an “all-or-nothing clause” is a health care contract 
provision that requires health insurance carriers or TPAs to (1) include 
all members of a health care provider in a network plan or (2) contract 
with the provider’s affiliate as a condition of entering into the contract.  2022SB-00416-R000362-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JKL 	Page 2 	4/6/22 
 
Anti-Steering Clause 
An “anti-steering clause” is a health care contract provision that 
limits the health insurance carrier’s or TPA’s ability to encourage 
enrollees to obtain health care from a hospital’s or health system’s 
competitor, including offering incentives that encourage enrollees to use 
specific providers. 
Anti-Tiering Clause 
The bill defines an “anti-tiering clause” as a health care contract 
provision that (1) restricts the health insurance carrier’s or TPA’s ability 
to introduce or modify a tiered network plan or assign providers into 
tiers or (2) requires the carrier or TPA to place all members of a provider 
in the same tier of a tiered network plan. 
By law, a “tiered network” is a network that places some or all types 
of health care providers and facilities into specific groups to which 
different participating provider reimbursement, access requirements, or 
cost sharing apply for the same health care services (CGS § 38a-472f). 
COMMITTEE ACTION 
Insurance and Real Estate Committee 
Joint Favorable 
Yea 17 Nay 0 (03/22/2022)