Connecticut House Bill HB06457

Connecticut 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/23
• Refer: 1/23/23

Caption

An Act Concerning The Use Of Self Defense In The Case Of An Imminent Threat Of Use Of Deadly Physical Force.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would have a profound impact on self-defense laws, potentially altering how courts interpret self-defense claims. By removing the duty to retreat, the legislation could lead to an increase in permissible use of deadly force in confrontational situations. This change aims to align the state's self-defense standards with those of other jurisdictions that have adopted similar measures. However, advocates of the bill suggest that this approach may also increase public safety by providing individuals with greater autonomy in self-defense situations.

Summary

House Bill 06457 proposes significant changes to the self-defense laws in the state by amending Section 53a-19 of the general statutes. The bill aims to eliminate the existing requirement that individuals must retreat before using deadly physical force in certain imminent threat situations. Proponents of the bill argue that this change will empower individuals to better protect themselves and others from imminent threats of deadly force or great bodily harm. The language of the bill emphasizes the need for individuals to feel secure and justified in defending themselves without unnecessary constraints, particularly in life-threatening scenarios.

Contention

Despite the support for HB 06457, there are concerns and criticisms from various segments of the community and legislative sphere. Opponents of the bill worry that it may encourage the use of deadly force in non-life-threatening situations and escalate confrontations, leading to greater risks of harm. Critics also argue that removing the retreat requirement could lead to an increase in violent outcomes and does not necessarily address the root causes of violent confrontations. Legislative debate around this bill will likely focus on finding a balance between individual rights to self-defense and public safety considerations.