Connecticut House Bill HB06495

Connecticut 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/24/23
• Refer: 1/24/23

Caption

An Act Preventing Electric Service Shutoffs During Summer Months For Certain Residential Customers.

Impact

If enacted, HB 6495 will directly amend section 16-262c of the general statutes, strengthening consumer protections against utility cut-offs by placing a specific emphasis on summer season electricity access for those in financial distress. This legislative move underscores the importance of ensuring that electricity remains accessible, particularly in times when low-income families and individuals may struggle to meet their utility bills due to various socio-economic challenges. The bill aims to support public health by mitigating the adverse effects of heat-related illnesses that can occur when electric service is interrupted.

Summary

House Bill 6495 is a proposed legislation aimed at protecting certain residential customers from electric service shutoffs during the summer months, particularly those facing economic hardships. The bill mandates electric distribution companies to refrain from denying or refusing to reinstate electric services for customers who are unable to pay their bills or arrearages during this period. This initiative reflects a growing concern for vulnerable populations who may experience heightened risks during the summer due to extreme heat and the essential nature of maintaining electricity for cooling and other critical needs.

Contention

While the bill seems to be largely popular among proponents advocating for consumer protection and social equity, there may be concerns raised by utility companies regarding the financial implications of restricting shut-offs. Questions may arise regarding how these regulations will be enforced and the potential impact on utilities' revenue. Critics may argue that such measures could result in increased costs for all customers if not balanced properly with the utility's operational needs, raising a discussion about the sustainability of such protections in the face of financial pressures on these companies.