Connecticut 2023 2023 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06620 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 03/30/2023

                     
Researcher: AR 	Page 1 	3/30/23 
 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
sHB 6620  
 
AN ACT PROMOTING COMPETITION IN CONTRACTS BETWEEN 
HEALTH CARRIERS AND HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS.  
 
SUMMARY 
This bill prohibits health care providers, health carriers (i.e., insurers 
and HMOs), health plan administrators, or any agent or entity 
contracting on their behalf from offering, soliciting, requesting, 
amending, renewing, or entering a health care contract on or after 
January 1, 2024, that includes an all-or-nothing clause, anti-steering 
clause, anti-tiering clause, or gag clause. 
The bill makes null and void any of these clauses in a health care 
contract (i.e., an oral or written agreement to provide services under a 
health benefit plan), written policy or procedure, or agreement. 
However, it specifies that (1) all remaining clauses remain in effect for 
the contract’s duration and (2) that it does not modify, reduce, or 
eliminate any existing privacy protections and standards under the 
federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability, Genetic 
Information Nondiscrimination, or federal Americans with Disabilities 
acts. 
The bill authorizes the attorney general to enforce its provisions, 
including by seeking a permanent injunction against violators.  
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2023 
PROHIBITED CLAUSES 
Under the bill, an “all-or-nothing clause” requires health carriers or 
health plan administrators to (1) include all members of a health care 
provider in a network plan or (2) contract with a provider’s affiliate as a 
condition of contracting with the provider.  2023HB-06620-R000326-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: AR 	Page 2 	3/30/23 
 
An “anti-steering clause” restricts a carrier or administrator from 
encouraging an enrollee to get healthcare services from a competing 
hospital or health system, including by offering incentives for enrollees 
to use specific healthcare providers. 
An “anti-tiering clause” (1) restricts health carriers from introducing 
or modifying a tiered network plan or assigning providers to tiers or (2) 
requires a health carrier to assign all health care provider members to 
the same tier. 
A “gag clause” restricts a health care provider, carrier, or 
administrator from disclosing certain information to a government 
entity (or its contractors or agents), enrollee or their treating provider, 
plan sponsor or potential eligible enrollees. The information is any price 
or quality information, including allowed amounts, negotiated rates or 
discounts, fees for services, or other claim related financial obligations. 
It also includes a clause that restricts the ability of a health care provider, 
carrier, or plan administrator to disclose out of pocket costs to enrollees.  
Applicability to Health Care Providers 
The bill defines a health care provider as a physician group with (1) 
eight or more members or (2) less than eight members that are employed 
by or are an affiliate of a hospital, medical foundation, or insurance 
company. A health care provider is also a for-profit or nonprofit entity, 
corporation or organization, parent corporation, member, affiliate, 
subsidy, or entity under common ownership that is authorized by 
Connecticut to bill or receive payment for health care services in the 
normal course of business. It also includes hospitals, hospital-based 
facilities, health systems, freestanding emergency departments, and 
imaging centers.  
ENFORCEMENT 
Under the bill, the attorney general may subpoena any parties to a 
health care contract to require them to submit related records needed to 
investigate suspected violations of the bill. The attorney general may 
seek temporary or permanent injunctions and other relief as appropriate 
to enjoin a health care provider, carrier, administrator, or other  2023HB-06620-R000326-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: AR 	Page 3 	3/30/23 
 
contracting entity from enforcing the prohibited contract clauses. If the 
court determines a contract violation exists, it may grant injunctive relief 
and other relief as justice may require. It may also set a deadline for the 
violating party to comply with an order.  
BACKGROUND 
Related Bill 
sSB 983, favorably reported by the Insurance and Real Estate 
Committee, contains substantially similar contract provisions.  
COMMITTEE ACTION 
Insurance and Real Estate Committee 
Joint Favorable Substitute 
Yea 12 Nay 0 (03/14/2023)