Connecticut 2023 2023 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06731 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 05/26/2023

                     
Researcher: JO 	Page 1 	5/26/23 
 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
HB 6731 (as amended by House "A")*  
 
AN ACT CONCERNING THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH'S 
RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP OF 
HEALTH CARE FACILITIES.  
 
SUMMARY 
This bill generally expands the circumstances under which licensed 
health care facility or institution (“facility”) ownership changes need 
prior approval from the Department of Public Health (DPH). It does so 
by eliminating exemptions in current law for (1) changes in ownership 
or beneficial ownership of under 10% of the stock of a corporation that 
owns or operates the facility or (2) certain transfers to relatives. As under 
current law, these provisions apply to all DPH-licensed institutions 
(e.g., hospitals, behavioral health facilities, nursing homes, outpatient 
surgical facilities, or home health care agencies). 
The bill requires proposed new owners to submit several documents 
and other information to DPH as part of its review of the transfer, such 
as (1) a copy of the sale or transfer agreement; (2) organizational charts, 
if applicable; and (3) information on certain prior penalties or sanctions 
in any state. The bill allows DPH to inspect facilities before approving 
an ownership change; current law requires an inspection.  
The bill establishes the criteria that the commissioner must consider 
when evaluating an application and sets conditions under which she 
may deny it (for example, if other facilities the person owned or 
operated were subject to specified adverse actions). It prohibits someone 
from applying to acquire ownership in a facility if DPH denied a prior 
application by the person’s relative. 
The bill gives the commissioner the discretion to waive specified 
requirements for certain applicants. It also creates an exemption from 
prior approval requirements for certain transfers involving outpatient  2023HB-06731-R010837-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JO 	Page 2 	5/26/23 
 
surgical facilities or nonprofit hospitals. 
The bill makes related changes by lowering the ownership threshold, 
from 10% to 5%, for certain notification requirements concerning 
nursing home licensing and ownership transfers. 
It also makes technical and conforming changes.  
*House Amendment “A” (1) delays the bill’s effective date by three 
months; (2) makes several changes to the underlying bill, such as 
allowing DPH to waive information submission requirements in certain 
circumstances and exempting certain transfers involving outpatient 
surgical facilities or nonprofit hospitals; and (3) adds the provisions 
lowering the ownership threshold for certain nursing home-related 
notifications.  
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2023 
APPROVAL PROCESS FOR HEALTH CARE FACILITY OWNERSHIP 
CHANGES 
Scope of Requirement 
The bill generally subjects all transfers of ownership or beneficial 
ownership of DPH-licensed health care facilities to prior approval by 
the department. This includes (1) direct ownership changes or (2) 
changes in the ownership of the business entity that owns, operates, or 
maintains the facility.  
The bill does so by eliminating two exemptions from current law. 
First, it eliminates the exemption for changes in ownership or beneficial 
ownership of under 10% of the stock of a corporation that owns, 
operates, or maintains the facility. 
Second, it eliminates the exemption for certain transfers to relatives, 
including relatives by marriage (specifically parents, spouses, children, 
siblings, aunts, uncles, nieces, or nephews). Current law exempts these 
transfers unless they involve (1) at least 10% of the ownership or 
beneficial ownership of the entity that owns, operates, or maintains 
more than one facility; (2) multiple facilities; or (3) a facility that is the  2023HB-06731-R010837-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JO 	Page 3 	5/26/23 
 
subject of a pending complaint, investigation, or licensure action. The 
bill specifies that changes in ownership or beneficial ownership 
resulting in transfers to these relatives to owners or beneficial owners 
are subject to prior approval. 
Similar to current law, the following are not considered to be 
ownership changes and do not require DPH approval: (1) a change in a 
licensee’s legal form of ownership (e.g., a corporation becoming a 
limited liability company) that does not change the beneficial ownership 
or (2) a public stock offering meeting certain requirements (e.g., it does 
not result in someone owning 10% or more of the stock). 
Additionally, the bill provides that, under certain conditions, the 
change in ownership of, or to, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit business entity 
licensed as a hospital is not considered to be an ownership change 
requiring approval. This applies if the ownership transfer is exempt 
from review under the law on nonprofit hospital transfers to for-profit 
entities. As with the other exemptions above, the owner must give DPH 
information about the change, as the department requires, to properly 
identify the current ownership status. 
The bill also exempts from these requirements transfers of ownership 
or beneficial ownership of 10% or less of an outpatient surgical facility 
to a physician, as long as the facility gives DPH information (in a manner 
the commissioner sets) to update the facility’s licensing information. 
Application Process 
Current law requires at least 120 days’ prior notice to DPH before a 
proposed facility ownership change, but it does not specify the 
application process. 
The bill requires the proposed new owner (or current owner, for 
changes in beneficial ownership) to apply within this same timeframe, 
in a way the commissioner sets. The application must include the 
following materials and information: 
1. a cover letter identifying the facility by name, address, county, 
and number and type of licensed beds;   2023HB-06731-R010837-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JO 	Page 4 	5/26/23 
 
2. a description of the proposed transaction; 
3. the names of each current owner and proposed new owner or 
beneficial owner;  
4. the names of each owner of any non-publicly traded parent 
corporation of each proposed new owner and beneficial owner;  
5. if applicable, organizational charts for the (a) current owner 
(showing the change in beneficial ownership) and (b) proposed 
new owner, its parent business entity, and its wholly owned 
subsidiaries; 
6. a copy of the sale agreement or other transfer of ownership 
document and any lease or management agreements; 
7. disclosures of whether each proposed new owner was ever 
convicted or pled guilty to fraud, patient or resident abuse or 
neglect, or a crime of violence or moral turpitude; and 
8. various disclosures for certain other facilities (see below).   
Other Facilities. Under the bill, the application also must include the 
name and address of any U.S.-based (including territories) licensed 
health care facility each proposed new owner or beneficial owner 
owned, operated, or managed during the prior five years. The bill 
requires several disclosures related to these facilities.  
The application must disclose any direct or indirect interest arising 
from the person’s ownership, operation, or management of these 
facilities. This includes interests in intermediate entities; parent, 
management, and property companies; and other related entities. 
The application must disclose whether each facility is the subject of a 
pending complaint, investigation, or licensure action by a government 
authority. Additionally, it must disclose whether each facility has been 
subject to the following: 
1. three or more civil penalties imposed through DPH final orders  2023HB-06731-R010837-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JO 	Page 5 	5/26/23 
 
or civil penalties in other states during the prior two years;  
2. Medicare or Medicaid sanctions in any state, other than civil 
penalties of $20,000 or less;   
3. termination or nonrenewal of a Medicare or Medicaid provider 
agreement; 
4. any violations of any state licensing or federal certification 
standard on inappropriate admission denials or discharges; and 
5. any state licensure or federal certification deficiency, during the 
prior five years, that presented a serious risk to the life, safety, or 
quality of care of the facility’s patients or residents.  
Under the bill, these serious risks include deficiencies that led to: 
1. a state or federal agency action to ban, curtail, or temporarily 
suspend facility admissions or suspend or revoke its license; 
2. a Medicare or Medicare decertification, termination, or exclusion 
from participation, including denying payment for new 
admissions solely due to the provider’s failure to correct 
deficiencies or non-compliance with regulatory requirements, 
imposed by DPH or the federal Centers for Medicare and 
Medicaid Services (CMS), due to noncompliance with Medicare 
or Medicaid conditions of participation; 
3. a citation of any deficiency that constitutes a pattern or 
widespread scope of actual harm or immediate jeopardy, or any 
deficiency causing widespread actual harm, as described in 
specified CMS regulations (for these purposes, “immediate 
jeopardy” is a situation where noncompliance with certain CMS 
requirements caused, or is likely to cause, a resident’s serious 
injury, harm, impairment, or death); 
4. a determination, on a second revisit, that the facility failed to 
correct cited deficiencies from a prior survey that led to CMS 
denying payment for new admissions or DPH requiring the  2023HB-06731-R010837-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JO 	Page 6 	5/26/23 
 
facility to curtail admissions; or 
5. a determination that the provider is a poor performer as defined 
by CMS based on a finding of substandard quality of care or 
immediate jeopardy on the current survey and on a survey in 
either of the two prior years.  
Under the bill, “substandard quality of care” means the failure to 
meet specified CMS requirements that constitute either (1) immediate 
jeopardy to resident health or safety; (2) a pattern of or widespread 
actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy; or (3) a widespread 
potential for more than minimal harm, but less than immediate 
jeopardy, with no actual harm. Generally, these requirements concern 
long-term care facility (1) admission, transfer, and discharge rights and 
(2) quality of care in numerous areas (e.g., respiratory care and pain 
management) (42 C.F.R. §§ 483.15 & 483.25). 
Inspection and Compliance With Regulatory Requirements 
The bill allows DPH, after receiving an application for an ownership 
change, to inspect the facility to ensure its compliance with applicable 
laws and regulations. Current law requires an inspection.  
As under current law, the bill conditions DPH’s approval on the 
facility showing that it has complied with all applicable requirements of 
the health care institution statutes, licensure regulations, and other 
applicable regulations. The bill also specifies that approval is 
conditioned upon the proposed new owner or beneficial owner meeting 
the bill’s requirements as to character and competence, quality of care, 
and an acceptable history of regulatory compliance (see below). 
Permissible Waiver 
The bill allows DPH to waive certain requirements.  
For ownership or beneficial ownership changes resulting in a transfer 
to a person related by blood or marriage to an owner or beneficial 
owner, she may waive the requirement to submit specified information 
on other health care facilities they owned or operated during the past 
five years (see above).  2023HB-06731-R010837-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JO 	Page 7 	5/26/23 
 
For ownership or beneficial ownership changes of 5% or less of the 
ownership of a business entity that is a licensed institution, she may 
waive (1) the submission of some or all of the information required 
under the bill or (2) the determination as to the owner’s character, 
competence, and related matters (see below). 
Under the bill, the commissioner must develop a waiver application 
process and the criteria for evaluating waiver requests. When 
developing the application process and criteria, the commissioner must 
consult with long-term care industry representatives. 
Grounds to Deny or Stay an Application 
The bill requires the commissioner, when evaluating an application, 
to consider whether each proposed new owner and beneficial owner 
demonstrates character and competence and quality of care. She must 
also consider whether any licensed facilities they owned, operated, or 
managed (in the U.S. and its territories) has an acceptable history of 
compliance in the past five years with (1) state licensure and regulatory 
requirements and (2) federal requirements. 
Under the bill, the commissioner may deny an application if these 
qualities are not demonstrated, as shown by the following: 
1. the facility was subject to any adverse action listed in the 
application (e.g., termination of a Medicare or Medicaid provider 
agreement or certain licensing or certification deficiencies); 
2. the facility had continuing violations, or a pattern of them, of 
state licensure or federal certification standards; or 
3. the applicant’s criminal conviction or guilty plea to any crime 
listed on the application (e.g., patient abuse or neglect). 
The bill also allows the commissioner to temporarily stay the 
department’s decision on an application if she determines that there are 
certain pending investigations of the applicant’s actions at any facility it 
operates or manages. This applies when th e investigation, if 
substantiated, would constitute a threat to patient or resident life, safety,  2023HB-06731-R010837-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JO 	Page 8 	5/26/23 
 
or quality of care. She may delay the decision until there is a final 
determination of the investigation.  
Additionally, if the commissioner denies an application, the bill 
prohibits the applicant’s relatives from applying to acquire an 
ownership interest in the facility. 
§§ 2 & 3 — NURSING HOME OWNERSHIP INTERESTS 
The bill requires applicants for a nursing home license to give DPH 
the names of anyone with a 5% or greater ownership interest in the 
owner, rather than 10% or greater as under current law. 
The bill makes a related change to the application for a nursing home 
ownership change. Existing law requires DPH to include on the 
application a statement notifying the potential nursing home licensee 
and owner that they (and certain other individuals) may be held civilly 
or criminally liable, or subject to administrative sanctions, for abuse or 
neglect of a resident by a nursing home employee. In addition to certain 
other listed positions, current law applies this notice provision to 
anyone having at least a 10% ownership interest in the nursing home or 
entity that owns it. The bill lowers this threshold to 5%. 
COMMITTEE ACTION 
Public Health Committee 
Joint Favorable 
Yea 25 Nay 12 (03/20/2023) 
 
Human Services Committee 
Joint Favorable 
Yea 14 Nay 7 (04/17/2023)