Connecticut 2023 2023 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06880 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 05/25/2023

                     
Researcher: MGS 	Page 1 	5/25/23 
 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
sHB 6880 (as amended by House "A")*  
 
AN ACT CONCERNING ASSORTED REVISIONS AND ADDITIONS 
TO THE EDUCATION STATUTES.  
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS: 
SUMMARY 
§ 1 — LIMITATIONS ON USE OF EDTPA 
Limits the use of the teacher preservice performance assessment, edTPA, to only as an 
accountability measure for teacher preparation programs, retroactive to July 1, 2022 
§ 2 — CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDERS FOR PROHIBITED PRACTICES 
Allows SBLR to issue a cease-and-desist order for certain violations of the teachers 
collective bargaining law 
§ 3 — RAISING THE KINDERGARTEN STARTING AGE 
Raises the age children can start public school kindergarten from age five by January of 
the school year to age five by September of the school year 
§§ 4 & 5 — PLAY-BASED LEARNING DURING PRESCHOOL, 
KINDERGARTEN, AND GR ADES ONE TO FIVE 
Requires schools to provide play-based learning during each regular school day for 
kindergarten and preschool students; requires school boards to permit a teacher to use 
play-based learning during the school day for grades one to five; adds play-based learning 
to educator professional development 
§§ 6-7 — EXIT SURVEY FOR TEACHERS LEAVING THE PROFESSION 
AND TEACHER ATTRITION RATES 
Requires school boards to (1) develop and conduct exit surveys of teachers voluntarily 
leaving employment with the board and (2) add teacher attrition rates to their strategic 
school profile report 
§ 8 — TEACHER PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS ADV ISORY COUNCIL 
Revises and expands the membership of the Teacher Professional Standards Advisory 
Council, including adding the Teacher of the Year and the previous year’s Teacher of the 
Year 
§ 9 — TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM TASK FORCE 
Establishes a task force to analyze the per pupil equity of TRS funding; requires the task 
force to submit its recommendations to the Education and Appropriations committees by 
January 1, 2025 
§§ 10 & 11 — PARAEDUCATOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT  2023HB-06880-R020825-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MGS 	Page 2 	5/25/23 
 
Excludes certain mandated trainings from paraeducator professional development 
programs; requires annual updates to SDE’s guidance and best practices for programs of 
professional development 
§ 11 — PARAEDUCATOR PDEC MEMBERSHIP 
Adds a paraeducator to each school district’s professional development and evaluation 
committee (PDEC) 
§ 12 — IEP REVIEW BY PARAPROFESSIONALS 
Requires paraeducators to review a student’s IEP with a supervisor as needed 
§ 13 — CERTIFICATE ENDORSEMENTS FOR PRES CHOOL AND 
KINDERGARTEN TEACHIN G 
Allows the education commissioner to allow a teacher with a (1) grade one through six 
endorsement to teach kindergarten for a second year without demonstrating enrollment in 
a kindergarten endorsement program or (2) grade one through 12 comprehensive special 
education endorsement to teach preschool in addition to kindergarten as current law 
allows 
§ 14 — ARC PROGRAM EXPANSION 
Requires OHE to expand its ARC program attended by minority teacher incentive 
program grant recipients and hire one full-time permanent employee to administer the 
expanded ARC program 
§ 15 — ADJUNCT ARTS INSTRUCTOR PERMIT 
Allows SBE to additionally issue adjunct instructor permits in the arts to applicants who 
hold a degree higher than a bachelor’s and meet other requirements in existing law 
§ 16 — STUDENT TEACHING EXPERIENCE BY DRG 
Removes the requirement that teacher preparation program participants complete their 
clinical, field, or student teaching experience in two different types of school districts 
according to DRG categorization 
§ 17 — INTEGRATED AND CROSS END ORSEMENTS 
Allows SDE, in cooperation with OHE, to authorize three new endorsements affecting 
early childhood education, special education, and grades kindergarten through three 
teaching positions 
§ 18 — SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS 
Allows local or regional boards of education, under certain circumstances, to employ a 
substitute teacher for up to 60 days without obtaining an SDE-issued substitute 
authorization 
§ 19 — PURCHASING TEACHER RETIREMENT CREDIT 
Removes service at SERC from the 10-year aggregate limit on purchases of TRS 
retirement credit 
§§ 20 & 21 — ADDITIONS TO THE TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT 
SYSTEM 
Expands the TRS to cover teachers employed by an interdistrict magnet school operated by 
(1) a private higher education institution’s board of governors; (2) an SDE-approved, 
third-party nonprofit corporation; or (3) Goodwin University Magnet Schools, Inc. and 
Goodwin University Educational Services, Inc., specifically  2023HB-06880-R020825-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MGS 	Page 3 	5/25/23 
 
§ 22 — TENURE AND ACCUMULATED SICK LEAVE 
Maintains a teacher’s tenure and accumulated sick leave in the event a new regional 
school district is formed 
§§ 23-27 — TEACHER PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS 
Requires local and regional boards of education to adopt revised teacher evaluation 
programs and SBE to adopt revised program guidelines that use new (1) student 
indicators and assessment methods and (2) teacher feedback mechanisms; removes obsolete 
language 
BACKGROUND 
 
 
SUMMARY 
This bill makes various changes to education laws, as described 
below. 
*House Amendment “A” is a strike-all amendment that replaces the 
underlying bill, thereby removing provisions on boards of education (1) 
making curriculum materials available to parents and guardians; (2) 
posting notice of school meal compliance with federal nutrition 
requirements; (3) allowing teenage fathers to attend adult education; (4) 
making board meeting agendas and documents publicly available; (5) 
giving in-service training on seizures; and (6) supplying free menstrual 
products in restrooms. It also removes provisions on the State 
Department of Education (SDE) (1) making a plan for a statewide 
remote learning school, (2) appointing a parent advisory committee and 
a teacher advisory committee, and (3) supporting after school grant 
recipients.  
EFFECTIVE DATE: Various; see below 
§ 1 — LIMITATIONS ON USE OF EDTPA 
Limits the use of the teacher preservice performance assessment, edTPA, to only as an 
accountability measure for teacher preparation programs, retroactive to July 1, 2022 
Retroactive to July 1, 2022, the bill requires that the state’s teacher 
preservice performance assessment, edTPA, can only be used as an 
accountability measure for teacher preparation programs and bars the 
State Board of Education (SBE) from using edTPA assessment results to 
deny an application for an initial educator certificate. In 2016, SBE 
approved a resolution that required all teacher preparation programs in  2023HB-06880-R020825-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MGS 	Page 4 	5/25/23 
 
the state, whether at four-year institutions or alternate route to 
certification programs, to require satisfactory completion of edTPA by 
all teacher candidates in order to complete a teacher preparation 
program. 
By law, unchanged by the bill, SBE must grant an initial educator 
certificate to any applicant who (1) holds a bachelor’s degree or an 
advanced degree from an accredited institution of higher education; (2) 
has completed (a) a teacher preparation program approved by SBE or 
the appropriate governing body in another state or (b) an alternate route 
to certification program approved by SBE or the appropriate governing 
body in another state, and satisfies the requirements for either a 
temporary 90-day certificate or a resident teacher certificate, both of 
which are short-term certificates; and (3) satisfies the special education 
coursework requirement (CGS § 10-145b). These requirements do not 
consider the results of the edTPA assessment.  
 It is not clear under the bill whether the use of edTPA as an 
accountability measure would mean teacher preparation programs 
could continue to use it as a program requirement.  
The Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning, and Equity created 
edTPA and Pearson Assessments, Inc., scores and administers it across 
the country. It generally costs applicants $300. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: Upon passage 
§ 2 — CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDERS FOR PROHIB ITED 
PRACTICES  
Allows SBLR to issue a cease-and-desist order for certain violations of the teachers 
collective bargaining law 
The bill allows the State Board of Labor Relations (SBLR) to issue a 
cease-and-desist order for certain violations of the teachers collective 
bargaining law (e.g., refusal to negotiate in good faith or retaliating 
against a complainant). Under the bill, when an alleged prohibited 
practice or breach of duty is ongoing, SBLR may order the party 
committing the act or practice to cease and desist from doing it until the 
board makes a determination on the matter.   2023HB-06880-R020825-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MGS 	Page 5 	5/25/23 
 
Currently, SBLR may only issue a cease-and-desist order after 
holding a hearing on the complaint and making a determination.  
By law, boards of education (i.e., “school board”) and an employees’ 
representative organization (i.e., “union”) can file complaints about 
prohibited practice violations with the SBLR. Certified teachers and 
other certified employees may also file complaints about a breach of the 
duty of fair representation.  
Initially, an agent investigates the complaint and may or may not 
issue a report charging there has been a prohibited practice. And if it 
does, SBLR must hold a hearing on the matter. Even if the agent’s report 
recommends dismissing the complaint, or the agent does not make a 
report or issue a complaint, the SBLR can still choose to hold a hearing. 
Under the bill, at this point in the process, the board can issue and 
cause to be served on the party committing the act or practice an order 
requiring the party to cease and desist from the act or practice until the 
board makes a determination. Current law authorizes SBLR to issue a 
cease-and-desist order only after holding a hearing on the complaint. 
The board can also take further action to ensure the prohibited practice 
or breach of duty is stopped and collective bargaining law is properly 
carried out. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2023 
§ 3 — RAISING THE KINDERGARTEN STARTING AGE  
Raises the age children can start public school kindergarten from age five by January of 
the school year to age five by September of the school year 
Current law requires children to be at least age five by January of the 
school year in order to enroll in public school kindergarten. The bill 
instead requires the child turn age five by September of the school year 
in order to enroll in kindergarten. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2024 
§§ 4 & 5 — PLAY-BASED LEARNING DURING PR ESCHOOL, 
KINDERGARTEN, AND GR ADES ONE TO FIVE   2023HB-06880-R020825-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MGS 	Page 6 	5/25/23 
 
Requires schools to provide play-based learning during each regular school day for 
kindergarten and preschool students; requires school boards to permit a teacher to use 
play-based learning during the school day for grades one to five; adds play-based learning 
to educator professional development 
The bill requires each school board to provide play-based learning 
during the instructional time of each regular school day for students in 
kindergarten and preschool. The play-based learning must (1) be 
incorporated and integrated into daily practice; (2) allow for the 
students’ needs to be met through free play, guided play, and games; 
and (3) not involve, predominantly, using mobile electronic devices. 
Additionally, it requires each school board to allow a teacher to use 
play-based learning during the instructional time of a regular school 
day for students in grades one to five, inclusive. The play-based learning 
may be incorporated and integrated into daily practice, and, as with 
kindergarten and preschool, must (1) allow for the students’ needs to be 
met through free play, guided play, and games and (2) predominantly 
not involve using mobile electronic devices. 
Under the bill “play-based learning” means a teaching approach that 
emphasizes play in promoting learning and includes developmentally 
appropriate strategies that can be integrated with existing learning 
standards. It does not mean time spent in recess or as part of a physical 
education course or instruction. 
The bill requires that any play-based learning comply with a 
student’s individualized education program under special education 
law or an accommodation plan under Section 504 of the federal 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. 
A school employee may only prevent or otherwise restrict a student’s 
participation in play-based learning if it is in accord with the school 
board’s policy addressing recess restrictions as a form of discipline.  
Definitions 
Under the bill:  
1. “Free play” means unstructured, voluntary, child-initiated 
activities a child does for self-amusement and have behavioral,  2023HB-06880-R020825-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MGS 	Page 7 	5/25/23 
 
social, and psychomotor rewards, except “free play” may be 
structured to promote activities that are child-directed, joyful, 
and spontaneous.     
2. “Guided play” means learning experiences that combine the 
child-directed nature of free play with a focus on learning 
outcomes and adult guidance. 
3. “Recess” means at least 20 minutes during the regular school day 
for each elementary school student devoted to physical exercise 
as required by law. 
4. “Mobile electronic device” means any hand-held or other 
portable electronic equipment that provides data communication 
between two or more individuals, including a text messaging or 
paging device, a personal digital assistant, a laptop computer, 
equipment that can play a video game or a digital video disk, or 
equipment on which digital images are taken or transmitted. 
5. “Instructional time” means the time of actual school work during 
a regular school day. 
Play-Based Learning and Professional Development 
Additionally, the bill adds play-based learning to educator 
professional development beginning July 1, 2024. Under current law, 
educator professional development must include a number of specific 
topics including refining and improving various effective teaching 
methods that are shared between and among educators. The bill adds 
that this must include play-based learning, as defined in the bill, for 
those teaching preschool or in grades kindergarten through five. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2024, except the professional development 
provision is effective July 1, 2023. 
§§ 6-7 — EXIT SURVEY FOR TEACHERS LEAVIN G THE 
PROFESSION AND TEACH ER ATTRITION RATES 
Requires school boards to (1) develop and conduct exit surveys of teachers voluntarily 
leaving employment with the board and (2) add teacher attrition rates to their strategic 
school profile report  2023HB-06880-R020825-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MGS 	Page 8 	5/25/23 
 
The bill requires each school board, by January 1, 2024, to develop an 
exit survey to be completed by a teacher who is employed by the board 
and voluntarily ceases employment with that board. The survey must 
include questions addressing (1) why the teacher is ceasing 
employment, (2) whether the teacher is leaving the profession, (3) the 
teacher’s demographics, and (4) the subject areas the teacher taught.  
The bill also requires school boards to add teacher attrition rates and 
the exit survey results to the existing strategic school profile report that 
school districts submit to SDE each year. The profile already includes 
information such as student performance, student needs, school 
resources and resource usage, and student discipline. SDE publishes the 
reports on its website. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2023 
§ 8 — TEACHER PROFES SIONAL STANDARDS ADV ISORY 
COUNCIL 
Revises and expands the membership of the Teacher Professional Standards Advisory 
Council, including adding the Teacher of the Year and the previous year’s Teacher of the 
Year 
The bill revises and expands the membership of the Teacher 
Professional Standards Advisory Council. The 17-member council is 
expanded to 19 members by adding the Teacher of the Year and the 
previous year’s Teacher of the Year and by adjusting the number of 
appointments for some of the appointing authorities. In addition, the 
bill changes the qualifiers for several members. 
By law, the council advises SBE, the Education Committee, and the 
governor on teacher preparation, recruitment, retention, certification, 
professional development, and assessment and evaluation. It must 
report by January 15 each year to SBE, the Education Committee, and 
the governor on its activities and recommendations, if any, about the 
teaching profession. 
The membership changes of appointed members are shown in the 
table below. 
  2023HB-06880-R020825-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MGS 	Page 9 	5/25/23 
 
Table: Teacher Professional Standards Advisory Council Appointed Members 
 Current Law 
 
Bill 
Appointing 
Authority 
Member Qualifier and Number of Appointments 
Governor Public member who 
represents business and 
industry  
No change  
State Board of 
Education 
One faculty member or 
administrator of a state-
approved teacher 
preparation program 
 
One public member who 
represents business and 
industry  
Two who are either faculty 
members or administrators of a 
state-approved teacher preparation 
program 
 
House speaker One parent of a public 
school elementary or 
secondary school student  
One parent or guardian of a public 
school elementary or secondary 
school student 
Senate president 
pro tempore 
One member who 
represents business and 
industry 
One administrator of a local or 
regional school board of education 
House majority 
leader 
One school superintendent No change 
Senate majority 
leader  
One member of a local or 
regional board of education  
No change 
House minority 
leader  
One public member  
 
One public school 
administrator 
One superintendent of a regional 
school district 
 
 
Senate minority 
leader  
One parent of a public 
school elementary or 
secondary school student 
One public member   
One parent of a public school 
secondary school student 
 
Connecticut 
Education 
Association 
Four classroom teachers at 
the time of, and during, 
their appointment; two of 
whom are elementary 
school teachers 
Four classroom teachers at the 
time of, and during, their 
appointment; two of whom are 
elementary school teachers, one is 
a secondary school teacher, and 
one is a special education teacher 
American 
Federation of 
Teachers – 
Connecticut  
Two classroom teachers at 
the time of, and during, 
their appointment; one of 
whom is an elementary 
school teacher 
 
Four classroom teachers at the 
time of, and during, their 
appointment; one of whom is an 
elementary school teacher, two are 
secondary school teachers, and 
one is a special education teacher  2023HB-06880-R020825-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MGS 	Page 10 	5/25/23 
 
The bill states that all appointments made after July 1, 2023, are for 
three-year terms. By law, terms are three years. 
The bill also removes an obsolete provision.  
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2023 
§ 9 — TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM TASK F ORCE 
Establishes a task force to analyze the per pupil equity of TRS funding; requires the task 
force to submit its recommendations to the Education and Appropriations committees by 
January 1, 2025  
The bill establishes a 13-member task force to analyze the per-pupil 
equity of Teachers’ Retirement System (TRS) funding. The task force 
must develop recommendations regarding:  
1. the student equity implications of appropriating funds through 
the state TRS laws toward the pension normal cost and the 
unfunded liability amortization payments necessary to fully 
fund the TRS (unfunded liability payments are made due to 
underfunding in previous years);  
2. whether and how much municipalities should contribute to the 
pension normal cost and the unfunded liability amortization 
payments in order to make the General Assembly’s allocations 
more equitable on a per-pupil basis;  
3. whether certain municipalities should be exempted from 
assuming a percentage of the municipal contributions identified 
above due to the following factors: (a) economic distress, (b) 
inability to pay, or (c) low academic performance; and  
4. whether and how the resources generated through municipal 
contributions should be directed by the General Assembly 
toward (a) reducing educational inequities and (b) promoting the 
TRS sustainability. 
Members 
The task force includes the following members, by virtue of their 
positions, or their designees: governor; education commissioner; TRS  2023HB-06880-R020825-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MGS 	Page 11 	5/25/23 
 
executive director; and the Commission on Women, Children, Seniors, 
Equity and Opportunity executive director. The appointed members are 
listed in the table below. 
Table: Task Force to Study the Per-Pupil Equity of TRS Funding Appointees 
Appointing Authority 
(Number of Appointments) 
Member Organization or Other Qualifier 
House speaker (one) American Federation of Teachers-Connecticut 
representative 
 
Senate president pro 
tempore (one) 
Connecticut Education Association representative 
House majority leader (one) Representative of an advocacy organization 
focused on educational equity 
Senate majority leader (one) Representative of an organization with national 
expertise in both teacher pensions and school 
finance 
House minority leader (two) • Connecticut Association of School 
Business Officials representative 
• Connecticut Association of Public School 
Superintendents representative 
Senate minority leader (two) • Connecticut Conference of Municipalities 
representative 
• Connecticut Association of Boards of 
Education representative 
Black and Puerto Rican 
Caucus chair (one) 
(No specific organization or qualifier) 
 
Any of the appointed members may be a member of the General 
Assembly. All initial appointments must be made no later than 30 days 
after the bill’s passage. Any vacancy will be filled by the appointing 
authority. 
The House speaker and the Senate president pro tempore select the 
chairpersons of the task force from among its members. The 
chairpersons must schedule the first meeting of the task force, which 
must be held no later than 60 days after the bill’s passage. 
The administrative staff of the Education Committee serves as task 
force administrative staff. 
By January 1, 2025, the task force must submit a report on its findings  2023HB-06880-R020825-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MGS 	Page 12 	5/25/23 
 
and recommendations to the Education and Appropriations committees 
and it terminates on the date the report is submitted or January 1, 2025, 
whichever is later. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: Upon passage 
§§ 10 & 11 — PARAEDUCATOR PROFESSIONA L DEVELOPMENT 
Excludes certain mandated trainings from paraeducator professional development 
programs; requires annual updates to SDE’s guidance and best practices for programs of 
professional development 
By law, local and regional boards of education must make available 
an annual, free professional development program of at least 18 hours 
to any paraeducators they employ. Beginning in the 2023-24 school year, 
the bill prohibits trainings that are otherwise mandated (e.g., training 
on blood-borne pathogens, sexual harassment, or Department of 
Children and Families’ policies and procedures) from being part of the 
18 hours. 
Additionally, the bill requires SDE to collaborate with the School 
Paraeducator Advisory Council to develop or update guidance and best 
practices for paraeducator professional development programs, which 
SDE must distribute to each board of education. By law, the School 
Paraeducator Advisory Council advises the education commissioner on 
professional development, staffing strategies, and other relevant issues 
relating to paraprofessionals (CGS § 10-155k). 
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2023 
§ 11 — PARAEDUCATOR PDEC MEMBERSHIP 
Adds a paraeducator to each school district’s professional development and evaluation 
committee (PDEC) 
By law, each local and regional board of education must form a 
professional development and evaluation committee (PDEC) to (1) 
participate in developing or adopting the district’s teacher evaluation 
and support program and (2) develop, evaluate, and annually update 
the district’s comprehensive local professional development plan for 
certified employees.  
Under current law, a PDEC’s members must be teachers,  2023HB-06880-R020825-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MGS 	Page 13 	5/25/23 
 
administrators, and other personnel the board finds appropriate. The 
bill adds at least one paraeducator, chosen by any exclusive bargaining 
representative for paraeducators, to the required PDEC membership. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2023 
§ 12 — IEP REVIEW BY PARAPROFESSIONALS 
Requires paraeducators to review a student’s IEP with a supervisor as needed  
By law, school paraprofessionals, or any other paraprofessional 
providing special education or related services to a student, must be 
allowed to view a student’s individualized education program (IEP). 
The bill adds the requirement that these paraprofessionals review the 
IEP with a supervisor, as needed. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2023 
§ 13 — CERTIFICATE ENDORSEMENTS FOR PRES CHOOL AND 
KINDERGARTEN TEACHIN G 
Allows the education commissioner to allow a teacher with a (1) grade one through six 
endorsement to teach kindergarten for a second year without demonstrating enrollment in 
a kindergarten endorsement program or (2) grade one through 12 comprehensive special 
education endorsement to teach preschool in addition to kindergarten as current law 
allows 
Elementary Endorsements 
By law and unchanged by the bill, if a person holds an elementary 
education endorsement to teach grades one through six, and that 
endorsement was issued on or after July 1, 2017, then the education 
commissioner may allow that person to teach kindergarten for one 
school year. The superintendent for the employing school district must 
request this permission. 
Current law prohibits the commissioner from granting the 
endorsement holder a second year to teach kindergarten unless the 
person demonstrates enrollment in a program to meet the requirements 
for the appropriate kindergarten endorsement. The bill allows the 
employing superintendent to request that the commissioner grant the 
endorsement holder a second year of kindergarten teaching and 
removes the requirement that the holder demonstrate kindergarten 
endorsement program enrollment.  2023HB-06880-R020825-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MGS 	Page 14 	5/25/23 
 
Comprehensive Special Education Endorsements 
Under current law, anyone who holds a teaching certificate with an 
endorsement to teach comprehensive special education in grades one 
through 12 may extend the endorsement to grades kindergarten 
through 12 if the applicant has earned a satisfactory score on either the 
SBE-approved reading instruction exam or a comparable reading 
instruction exam with minimum standards that are equivalent to the 
SBE-approved one.  
Under the bill, anyone who holds this endorsement for grades one 
through 12 may extend it to grades prekindergarten through 12 if they 
meet the above reading instruction exam score requirements. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2023 
§ 14 — ARC PROGRAM EXPANSION 
Requires OHE to expand its ARC program attended by minority teacher incentive 
program grant recipients and hire one full-time permanent employee to administer the 
expanded ARC program 
The bill requires the Office of Higher Education (OHE), within 
available appropriations, to (1) expand its alternate route to certification 
(ARC) program that minority teacher incentive program grant 
recipients attend and (2) hire one full-time permanent employee to 
administer the expanded program. By law, OHE’s minority teacher 
incentive program provides, within available appropriations, up to 
$5,000 in annual grants for up to two years to enroll in the ARC program, 
among other things (CGS § 10a-168a). 
EFFECTIVE DATE: Upon passage 
§ 15 — ADJUNCT ARTS INSTRUCTOR PERMIT 
Allows SBE to additionally issue adjunct instructor permits in the arts to applicants who 
hold a degree higher than a bachelor’s and meet other requirements in existing law 
By law, SBE may issue part-time adjunct instructor permits to 
applicants with specialized training, experience, or expertise in the arts 
if an employing board of education or regional educational service 
center requests it. The permit authorizes its holder to teach art, music, 
dance, theater, or any subject related to the holder’s artistic specialty for  2023HB-06880-R020825-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MGS 	Page 15 	5/25/23 
 
up to 15 hours per week in certain magnet schools. 
Current law requires applicants for this permit to hold a bachelor’s 
degree from an institution that is regionally accredited or accredited by 
OHE or the Board of Regents for Higher Education. The bill expands 
this educational requirement to allow applicants with an academic 
degree that is higher than a bachelor’s to hold the permit. By law and 
unchanged by the bill, applicants must also meet certain work 
experience requirements. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2023 
§ 16 — STUDENT TEACHING EXPERIENCE BY DRG 
Removes the requirement that teacher preparation program participants complete their 
clinical, field, or student teaching experience in two different types of school districts 
according to DRG categorization 
By law, teacher preparation program participants must complete a 
clinical, field, or student teaching experience in a classroom during four 
semesters. The bill removes the requirement that this experience occur 
in two school districts from certain categories of district reference 
groups (DRGs).  
SDE created DRGs to group districts with similar needs and 
socioeconomic characteristics, based on factors including family 
income, parental education and occupation, family structure, poverty, 
language spoken at home, and district enrollment. (According to the 
department, it no longer uses this classification system.) DRGs were 
labeled “A” through “I,” with “A” being the most affluent districts and 
“I” being the least. The bill removes the requirement that program 
participants complete one student teaching experience in a school 
district from groups “A” through “E” and another in a district from 
groups “F” through “I.”  
The bill also removes the requirement that any cooperating teacher 
who is part of the student teaching experience must have earned a 
performance evaluation designation of “exemplary” or “proficient” in 
the prior school year to serve as a mentor to student teachers.   2023HB-06880-R020825-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MGS 	Page 16 	5/25/23 
 
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2023 
§ 17 — INTEGRATED AND CROSS ENDORSEMENTS 
Allows SDE, in cooperation with OHE, to authorize three new endorsements affecting 
early childhood education, special education, and grades kindergarten through three 
teaching positions  
SDE issues endorsements to teachers who hold initial, provisional, or 
professional level teacher certification. These endorsements are added 
to the certificate to signify expertise in a subject area. SDE refers to 
additional endorsements received in other subject areas as cross 
endorsements. 
Beginning on July 1, 2023, the bill allows SDE, in cooperation with 
OHE, to authorize the following new endorsements: (1) Integrated Early 
Childhood/Special Education Birth-Kindergarten, (2) Integrated Early 
Childhood/Elementary Education N-3, and (3) Special Education N-K. 
The bill specifies that the second and third endorsements listed above 
are to be added as a cross endorsement as a replacement for requiring 
full planned program and institutional recommendation. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2023 
§ 18 — SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS 
Allows local or regional boards of education, under certain circumstances, to employ a 
substitute teacher for up to 60 days without obtaining an SDE-issued substitute 
authorization 
The bill allows local or regional boards of education to employ a 
substitute teacher for up to 60 days without obtaining an SDE-issued 
substitute authorization, so long as the substitute teacher is in the same 
assignment for the entire period. By law and unchanged by the bill, 
anyone employed as a substitute teacher must hold a bachelor’s degree 
(which the education commissioner may waive for good cause) and be 
on a list of substitute teachers maintained by the employing board. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2023 
§ 19 — PURCHASING TEACHER RETIREMENT CRE DIT 
Removes service at SERC from the 10-year aggregate limit on purchases of TRS 
retirement credit   2023HB-06880-R020825-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MGS 	Page 17 	5/25/23 
 
The law allows TRS members to purchase retirement credit for 
certain service outside the system, such as public school teaching in 
another state or in a federal Defense Department school for military 
dependents. Such purchases allow the TRS members to build additional 
credit toward their retirement provided the service the purchase is 
based on is not used for a retirement benefit of another governmental 
pension system other than Social Security. TRS members are generally 
all certified public school teachers and administrators in the state with 
some additional groups added by statute.   
Generally, these purchases are limited to a total of 10 years, but 
service as a public school teacher in another state is exempt from this 
limit. The law allows for the purchase of retirement credit for service at 
the State Education Resource Center (SERC) before July 1, 2007. The bill 
makes the SERC service and the out-of-state teaching service, combined, 
exempt from the 10 year limit. The credit must be paid for at the present 
value of the full actuarial cost. It also specifies the SERC service is 
deemed service in the public schools of Connecticut. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2023 
§§ 20 & 21 — ADDITIONS TO THE TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT 
SYSTEM 
Expands the TRS to cover teachers employed by an interdistrict magnet school operated by 
(1) a private higher education institution’s board of governors; (2) an SDE-approved, 
third-party nonprofit corporation; or (3) Goodwin University Magnet Schools, Inc. and 
Goodwin University Educational Services, Inc., specifically 
By law, teachers employed at a “public school,” as defined in state 
law, may participate in the TRS. The bill adds to the definition of “public 
school” any interdistrict magnet school that is operated by (1) a private 
higher education institution’s board of governors or (2) an SDE-
approved, third-party nonprofit corporation, so long as the magnet 
school is classified as a public school by the Teachers’ Retirement Board 
(TRB). 
The bill also requires the TRB to (1) classify as public schools all 
schools operated by Goodwin University Magnet Schools, Inc. and 
Goodwin University Educational Services, Inc. and (2) admit each  2023HB-06880-R020825-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MGS 	Page 18 	5/25/23 
 
teacher employed at them. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2023 
§ 22 — TENURE AND ACCUMULAT ED SICK LEAVE  
Maintains a teacher’s tenure and accumulated sick leave in the event a new regional 
school district is formed 
State law maintains a teacher’s tenure and accumulated sick leave in 
the event the school district the teacher works for joins a regional school 
district. The law requires that this change is not deemed an interruption 
of continuous employment, so tenure and accumulated sick leave is 
preserved.  
The bill modifies this to include when a teacher with these 
accumulated rights who works for a school district or a regional school 
district begins working for a new regional school district. As with 
existing law, the teacher must work for a school district or regional 
school district during the school year immediately before, or within 
which, the new regional district is established and continues as an 
employee of the new regional district. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2023 
§§ 23-27 — TEACHER PERFORMANCE EVALUATIO NS 
Requires local and regional boards of education to adopt revised teacher evaluation 
programs and SBE to adopt revised program guidelines that use new (1) student 
indicators and assessment methods and (2) teacher feedback mechanisms; removes obsolete 
language 
By law, each public school district’s superintendent must annually 
evaluate each teacher or have each teacher be evaluated. This refers to 
each professional board of education employee, below the rank of 
superintendent, who holds an SBE-issued certificate or permit. The 
superintendent may conduct formative (i.e., continuous diagnostic) 
evaluations to be used to produce an annual summative (i.e., final) 
evaluation. 
This bill makes various changes in the teacher evaluation laws, 
requiring local and regional boards of education to adopt revised 
teacher evaluation programs and SBE to adopt revised program  2023HB-06880-R020825-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MGS 	Page 19 	5/25/23 
 
guidelines that use new (1) student indicators and assessment methods 
and (2) teacher feedback mechanisms. The bill maintains the option for 
boards of education to adopt SBE’s model teacher evaluation and 
support program, but it requires SBE to ensure that its model program 
aligns with these revised guidelines. 
The bill also removes obsolete language, including references to a 
now obsolete teacher evaluation and support pilot program and a 
UConn study of the pilot program. It also makes technical and 
conforming changes.  
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2023 
Teacher Evaluation and Support Program 
Under current law, the evaluation process must follow the teacher 
evaluation and support program adopted by the district’s board of 
education and be aligned with the State Board of Education’s (SBE) 
guidelines for a model teacher evaluation program. In developing a 
program for the district, the board of education must attempt to reach a 
mutual agreement with the district’s professional development and 
evaluation committee (PDEC). 
SBE Program. By July 1, 2024, the bill requires SBE to adopt revised 
guidelines for a teacher evaluation and support program, in 
consultation with the Performance Evaluation Advisory Council 
(PEAC; see below). It also requires SBE to adopt a revised model teacher 
evaluation and support program that aligns with these guidelines. The 
bill makes the following changes to revise the guidelines that current 
law required SBE to adopt for its model program in 2012: 
1. removes the requirement that the guidelines include (a) four 
performance evaluation designators for teachers (i.e., 
“exemplary,” “proficient,” “developing,” and “below standard”) 
and (b) references to teacher evaluation “scoring systems” to 
determine “ratings”; 
2. requires the guidelines to use student learning, growth, and 
achievement, rather than student academic growth and  2023HB-06880-R020825-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MGS 	Page 20 	5/25/23 
 
development, as indicators in teacher evaluations; 
3. requires the guidelines to include methods for assessing student 
learning, growth, and achievement rather than student academic 
growth and development; 
4. requires the guidelines to consider control factors tracked by the 
statewide public school information system that may influence 
teacher performance, including student characteristics, student 
attendance, and student mobility; 
5. requires the guidelines to use an evaluator-provided annual 
summary of teacher growth, rather than a scoring system with 
performance evaluation designators, for the minimum 
requirements for teacher evaluation instruments and procedures; 
6. requires the guidelines to address creating individual 
improvement and remediation plans for teachers who need 
additional support, rather than for teachers who have a rating of 
“developing” or “below standard”;  
7. removes the requirement that these individual improvement and 
remediation plans include a summative rating of proficient or 
better as success indicators at the plan’s conclusion; and 
8. requires the guidelines to include a validation procedure for the 
State Department of Education (SDE) or a third party to audit 
remediation plans, rather than audit evaluations with a rating of 
“exemplary” or “below standard” as current law requires. 
District Program. The bill requires each local and regional board of 
education, beginning with the 2024-25 school year, to adopt and 
implement a revised teacher evaluation and support program that 
follows SBE’s revised guidelines. 
As under current law, the bill requires that the program be developed 
through mutual agreement between the board of education and the 
school district’s PDEC. If a board is unable to reach a mutual agreement 
with the PDEC, then both parties must consider SBE’s model program  2023HB-06880-R020825-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MGS 	Page 21 	5/25/23 
 
and may adopt that if they mutually agree. If both parties are still cannot 
reach an agreement, then the board must adopt and implement the 
program it has developed, so long as it is consistent with SBE guidelines. 
The bill allows the education commissioner to waive the requirement 
that a board adopt a program consistent with SBE’s revised guidelines 
for any board that has expressed an intent by July 1, 2024, to adopt a 
program that requires a waiver from these requirements. 
By law, each board of education must provide training and 
orientation programs for evaluators and teachers on the local evaluation 
and support program. The bill requires, beginning with the 2023-2024 
school year, that the training programs and orientation be held at least 
annually, rather than biennially. 
Other Evaluation Process Changes 
The bill also makes the following changes to the state’s teacher 
evaluation process: 
1. requires teachers who do not receive a summative evaluation 
during the school year to be recorded as “not evaluated” rather 
than “not rated” as current law requires and 
2. removes the requirement that superintendents report aggregate 
evaluation ratings to the education commissioner by September 
15 each year. 
PEAC 
Under existing law, PEAC is a council within SDE, led by the 
education commissioner with members from various education interest 
groups. The bill maintains PEAC’s responsibility under current law to 
(1) assist SBE with developing guidelines for a teacher evaluation and 
support program and developing a model program and (2) oversee the 
data collection and evaluation support system; however, it removes the 
requirement that PEAC assist SBE with developing a teacher evaluation 
and support program implementation plan.  
BACKGROUND  2023HB-06880-R020825-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MGS 	Page 22 	5/25/23 
 
Related Bills 
sHB 6757 (File 585), favorably reported by the Education Committee, 
has substantially similar provisions that make changes in the statutes 
governing the teacher evaluation and support program. 
sHB 6879 (File 589), favorably reported by the Education Committee, 
has substantially similar provisions that make changes in the statutes 
governing teacher certificate endorsements for preschool, kindergarten, 
and special education (§§ 1 & 6), the ARC program (§ 3), the adjunct 
instructor permit for the arts (§ 4), student teaching (§ 5), integrated and 
cross-endorsements (§ 8), and substitute teachers (§ 9). 
SB 2, (File 77, as amended by Senate “A”) includes the same play-
based learning provision. 
COMMITTEE ACTION 
Education Committee 
Joint Favorable Substitute 
Yea 44 Nay 0 (03/24/2023) 
 
Appropriations Committee 
Joint Favorable Substitute 
Yea 53 Nay 0 (05/01/2023)