Connecticut House Bill HB06893

Connecticut 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/9/23
• Refer: 3/9/23
• Report Pass: 3/24/23
• Refer: 4/3/23
• Report Pass: 4/11/23
• Engrossed: 6/7/23
• Report Pass: 6/7/23
• Passed: 6/7/23
• Chaptered: 6/21/23
• Enrolled: 6/22/23
• Vetoed: 6/29/23

Caption

An Act Concerning Certain Adjustments To Gross Assessments Of Taxable Real Property.

Impact

The bill stipulates that any person bound by a lease or who has transferred property title can file an appeal against their town's assessment decisions. It emphasizes that these appeals must be filed electronically or in writing and prescribes specific timelines and requirements for notifications regarding appeal hearings. These changes aim to ensure that property owners are better informed of their rights and the appeals process, potentially leading to a fairer evaluation of property taxes.

Summary

House Bill 06893, also known as An Act Concerning Certain Adjustments To Gross Assessments Of Taxable Real Property, aims to modify the process through which property owners may appeal their property tax assessments in Connecticut. The key change proposed by this bill involves the repeal of certain subsections of the existing property tax assessment laws and their replacement with more streamlined rules for filing appeals. The new provisions are designed to enhance the transparency and efficiency of the appeal process for aggrieved taxpayers.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 06893 appears largely positive, particularly among property owners and real estate stakeholders who feel that the modifications promote greater accountability and responsiveness from local assessors. Nonetheless, some concerns have been raised about the efficiency of the appeals process and whether these changes will adequately address all grievances about property assessments in practice, especially in cases with higher-value properties.

Contention

Notable points of contention include whether the bill will effectively balance the interests of taxpayers with the operational needs of local tax authorities. Some critics have argued that while the changes aim to improve accessibility, they may inadvertently lead to an increase in appeals, which could strain local resources and complicate the assessment process. Consequently, future discussions may focus on resource allocation and process efficiency to ensure that both taxpayer rights and municipal capabilities are adequately addressed.