Connecticut Senate Bill SB00853

Connecticut 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/20/23
• Refer: 1/20/23

Caption

An Act Concerning Revisions To The Affordable Housing Appeals Procedure And Requiring A Study On Building Applications And Building Codes.

Impact

This bill has significant implications for state laws governing affordable housing by authorizing municipalities to establish tax abatements for qualifying market-rate properties. This could incentivize the development of affordable housing by reducing tax burdens and encouraging compliance with income qualification standards outlined in the existing housing statutes. Moreover, it gives municipalities the flexibility to define 'median income', either by choosing the state or local area median income, thereby adjusting local housing strategies to better fit community needs.

Summary

Senate Bill 00853 is an act designed to revise procedures surrounding affordable housing appeals as well as to study building applications and building codes. The bill intends to include certain market-rate properties in the calculation of the ten-percent threshold under the affordable housing appeals procedure, thereby broadening the scope of properties considered for such appeals. Additionally, it aims to enforce stricter regulations that ensure rental rates for affordable housing units are verified through documented agreements, thus enhancing transparency in rental agreements for these properties.

Contention

The proposed changes may provoke contention among stakeholders, particularly regarding the intent behind verifying rental rate documentation and the broadening of appeal thresholds. Proponents argue that these measures will rectify existing issues in the affordable housing market, ensuring that all qualifying properties are fairly considered. Conversely, opponents might raise concerns about potential burdens on developers and the administrative implications of new verification processes, as well as the crux of redefining median income calculations that local communities may view as a loss of control over housing policy.