Connecticut 2023 2023 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01046 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 03/16/2023

                    OFFICE OF FISCAL ANALYSIS 
Legislative Office Building, Room 5200 
Hartford, CT 06106  (860) 240-0200 
http://www.cga.ct.gov/ofa 
sSB-1046 
AN ACT CONCERNING THE REDUCTION OF FOOD WASTE IN 
SCHOOLS.  
 
Primary Analyst: DD 	3/15/23 
Contributing Analyst(s): SB, MR   
 
 
 
 
OFA Fiscal Note 
 
State Impact: 
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 24 $ FY 25 $ 
Department of Energy and 
Environmental Protection 
GF - Potential 
Cost 
See Below See Below 
Note: GF=General Fund  
Municipal Impact: 
Municipalities Effect FY 24 $ FY 25 $ 
Local and Regional School 
Districts 
STATE 
MANDATE
1
 
- Cost 
Potential Potential 
  
Explanation 
The bill results in potential costs for certain school districts by 
establishing several requirements for the disposal of organic material 
(primarily food waste) in public schools, and by establishing a related 
voluntary pilot program.  
The bill requires districts that (1) generate at least 26 tons of organic 
materials annually and (2) are located within 20 miles of a composting 
facility to separate organic materials from other solid waste and ensure 
that those materials are recycled at an authorized composting facility 
                                                
1
 State mandate is defined in Sec. 2-32b(2) of the Connecticut General Statutes, "state 
mandate" means any state initiated constitutional, statutory or executive action that 
requires a local government to establish, expand or modify its activities in such a way 
as to necessitate additional expenditures from local revenues.  2023SB-01046-R000105-FN.DOCX 	Page 2 of 3 
 
 
beginning in FY 24.
2
 It also allows districts that do not meet these 
thresholds to participate in a voluntary pilot program to recycle organic 
material in the same manner.  
Districts subject to the bill's requirements, or districts that choose to 
participate in the voluntary pilot program, will incur costs associated 
with storing and transporting organic materials separately from 
nonorganic materials and with disposing organic materials at 
appropriate facilities. In districts that pay tipping fees to the waste 
management companies they currently use, the cost incurred by the bill 
may be at least partially offset by savings associated with reduced 
tipping fees, as organic waste will no longer be disposed of by those 
companies.  
Current costs for solid waste disposal across ten school districts range 
from $18,000 in a small district (enrollment of 452) to $345,000 in a 
medium sized district (enrollment 9,800), among the 13 districts for 
which information is available. In most instances, these costs made up 
less than half of one percent of the district's annual budget. It is not 
known if any of these districts would meet the bill's thresholds for the 
requirement to separate organic and non-organic waste, rather than the 
option to participate in the voluntary pilot program.  
The bill allows local and regional school districts to share services 
related to the recycling of organic materials. Any savings achieved via 
such service sharing agreements would at least partially offset the costs 
in the bill.  
It is estimated that organic waste (i.e. food scraps) makes up 22% of 
all municipal solid waste generated annually, not specific to school 
districts. In FY 22, the average tip fee was $102 per ton across all waste 
management facilities according to the Department of Energy and 
Environmental Protection (DEEP). 
                                                
2
 Seven such facilities currently exist in the state, located in Berlin, Ellington, New 
Milford, North Haven, Thompson, and two in Southington.  2023SB-01046-R000105-FN.DOCX 	Page 3 of 3 
 
 
The bill requires DEEP to administer the voluntary pilot program for 
organic materials composting for local and regional school districts 
beginning in FY 24. Any administrative cost to DEEP will depend on the 
scope of the program.  
Lastly, the bill requires the State Department of Education (SDE) to 
develop guidelines in FY 24 concerning the implementation of a 
composting station program in schools. This has no fiscal impact, as it is 
anticipated that SDE can develop these guidelines with existing 
resources.  
The Out Years 
The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would 
continue into the future subject to inflation and the volume of organic 
materials sent by schools to composting facilities instead of waste 
management companies