Connecticut 2023 2023 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01155 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 04/13/2023

                     
Researcher: TA 	Page 1 	4/13/23 
 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
sSB 1155  
 
AN ACT IMPLEMENTING RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE FREEDOM 
OF INFORMATION COMMISSION.  
 
SUMMARY 
This bill makes several unrelated changes to the Freedom of 
Information Act (FOIA), including the following: 
1. limits the applicability of FOIA’s definition of “governmental 
function” so that it applies only to one statute on contracts for 
performing a governmental function, rather than throughout 
FOIA (§§ 1-3); 
2. conforms the law on trainings given by the Freedom of 
Information Commission (FOIC) to current practice (§ 4); 
3. explicitly allows the copying of public records using mobile 
telephones or cameras (§ 6); 
4. allows notices of a special meeting to be sent to a public agency’s 
members electronically (§ 7); and 
5. clarifies which public agencies must be named in an appeal to 
FOIC when a request to inspect or copy a record is denied under 
FOIA’s safety risk exemption (§ 11). 
Additionally, the bill specifies that FOIA’s disclosure exemption for 
records covered by the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy 
Act (FERPA) applies to education records, rather than educational 
records as current law provides (§ 5). This conforms with terminology 
used in FERPA (20 U.S.C. § 1232g(4)). 
Lastly, the bill makes technical and conforming changes. Among 
other things, it amends provisions on the awarding of state government 
information technology contracts to remove erroneous references to (1)  2023SB-01155-R000564-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: TA 	Page 2 	4/13/23 
 
FOIC training and fees for copying public records and (2) the statutory 
list of department heads (§§ 8-10). 
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2023 
§§ 1-3 — GOVERNMENTAL FUNCTION 
Under FOIA, “governmental function” generally includes a public 
agency program’s administration or management by a person that, 
among other things, participates in formulating governmental policies 
or decisions connected to the program’s administration or management. 
It does not include the mere provision of goods or services to a public 
agency without delegated program management or administration 
responsibilities. 
The bill limits this definition’s applicability so that it applies only to 
one statute on contracts for performing a governmental function, rather 
than throughout FOIA as under current law (see BACKGROUND). In 
doing so, the bill clarifies that the statutory definition does not apply at 
common law, where “governmental function” has a similar (though not 
identical) meaning (see BACKGROUND). 
Under current law, “governmental function” also appears in a FOIA 
provision that generally prohibits public agencies from entering into 
contracts that impair the public’s right to inspect or copy records stored 
in a computer system the agency owns, leases, or uses in the course of 
its governmental functions. The bill makes a conforming change by 
eliminating the reference to governmental functions. 
§ 4 — FOIC TRAINING 
The law requires FOIC to hold annual training sessions for members 
of public agencies on FOIA’s provisions (e.g., meeting-related 
requirements). The bill eliminates requirements for FOIC to hold 
training on (1) physical requirements for public records (e.g., standard 
ink) and (2) using electronic nicotine or vapor products. It adds 
requirements for the commission to hold training on (1) contracts for the 
performance of a governmental function, (2) veterans’ military records, 
and (3) court actions involving FOIA. 
§ 6 — USING MOBILE PHONES AND CAMERA S TO MAKE COPIES  2023SB-01155-R000564-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: TA 	Page 3 	4/13/23 
 
The bill explicitly allows individuals to copy public records using 
mobile telephones, cameras, or other portable devices capable of 
capturing an image of a public record. It does so by deeming these 
devices to be “hand-held scanners” as defined in FOIA. 
FOIA allows (1) individuals to use a hand-held scanner to copy 
records and (2) public agencies to charge up to $20 each time an 
individual uses a scanner to copy records at the agency. Currently under 
FOIA, a “hand-held scanner” is a battery-operated electronic scanning 
device that leaves no mark or impression on the records and does not 
unreasonably interfere with the agency’s operations. 
§ 7 — NOTICES OF A SPECIAL MEETING 
Under FOIA, public agencies must give at least 24 hours’ notice of a 
special meeting, unless there is an emergency. A special meeting is one 
held to consider business that (1) was unforeseen when scheduling 
regular meetings and (2) should be addressed before the next regular 
meeting. 
The bill allows notices of a special meeting to be sent to a public 
agency’s members electronically or by mail to their homes. Current law 
requires that the notice be delivered to the member’s home. Current law 
also allows members to waive delivery of the notice by filing a written 
waiver with the agency’s clerk or secretary. The bill allows members to 
submit these waivers electronically or by mail. 
§ 11 — SECURITY APPEALS 
Under FOIA, an executive branch state agency that receives a request 
to disclose records potentially subject to FOIA’s safety risk exemption 
(CGS § 1-210(b)(19)) must consult with the Department of 
Administrative Services (DAS) commissioner before disclosing the 
records. A municipal, regional, or district agency must consult with the 
Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection (DESPP) 
commissioner. In both cases, FOIA allows the applicable commissioner 
to direct the custodial agency to withhold the record from disclosure. 
Under current law, any FOIC appeal of a denial based on FOIA’s 
safety risk exemption must be filed against the state, municipal, 
regional, or district agency that issued the directive to withhold the  2023SB-01155-R000564-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: TA 	Page 4 	4/13/23 
 
record. Under the bill, the appeal must be filed against both the agency 
with custody of the record and the commissioner (DAS or DESPP, as 
applicable) that directed the agency to withhold the record. 
BACKGROUND 
Contract for Performance of a Governmental Function 
By law, each contract exceeding $2.5 million between a public agency 
and a person for the performance of a “governmental function” must 
state that the public agency is entitled to a copy of records and files 
related to the performance of the governmental function. The contract 
must also indicate that these records or files are subject to FOIA and may 
be disclosed by the public agency under FOIA. 
Governmental Function: Common Law 
By law, FOIA applies to non-public entities to the extent they are 
deemed to be the functional equivalent of a public agency (CGS § 1-
200(1)(B)). To determine whether a person is the “functional equivalent” 
of a public agency, courts and FOIC apply a four-part test established 
by the Connecticut Supreme Court in Board of Trustees of Woodstock 
Academy v. FOI Commission, 181 Conn. 544 (1980). One component of this 
test is whether the entity performs a governmental function. 
In applying the functional equivalent test in a 1998 case, the Appellate 
Court held that “Performing a government service pursuant to contract 
does not make an entity a public agency subject to [FOIA]…. The key to 
determining whether an entity is a government agency or merely a 
contractor with the government is whether the government is really 
involved in the core of the program” (Domestic Violence Services of Greater 
New Haven, Inc. v. Freedom of Information Commission, 47 Conn. App. 466 
(1998)). 
COMMITTEE ACTION 
Government Administration and Elections Committee 
Joint Favorable Substitute 
Yea 18 Nay 0 (03/24/2023)