Connecticut Senate Bill SB01191

Connecticut 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/3/23
• Refer: 3/3/23
• Report Pass: 3/24/23
• Refer: 4/6/23
• Report Pass: 4/13/23

Caption

An Act Prohibiting The Use Of A Certain Application, Software And Programs On State Government Devices And Requiring Minimum Security Standards And Annual Audits Of Such Devices.

Impact

The legislation will impact the policies governing state employee technology use, focusing on enhancing cybersecurity measures. By restricting access to certain applications, especially those perceived as security threats, the bill aims to protect state data and ensure that state officials are using secure and vetted software for their operations. The establishment of minimum security standards and regular audits reflects a significant step towards creating a more secure digital environment within state government, which is increasingly reliant on technology.

Summary

SB01191 proposes regulations explicitly prohibiting the use of the application TikTok, as well as other software deemed a cybersecurity threat, on state-issued devices for public officials and state employees. The bill mandates the establishment of minimum security standards for these devices and conducts annual audits to ensure compliance with these standards. The intent is to mitigate cybersecurity risks associated with the use of modern applications and technologies in state governance, particularly from potential unauthorized access or data breaches that could endanger sensitive state information.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding SB01191 is mixed, reflecting divided opinions among legislators and public stakeholders. Proponents argue that this bill is necessary for safeguarding state information and maintaining cybersecurity integrity, especially in light of growing concerns around foreign applications like TikTok. Critics, however, may view this as an overreach or overregulation that could impede the use of useful digital tools by state officials. This tension between security and operational flexibility underscores broader debates on technology governance in public administration.

Contention

Key points of contention include the specific targeting of TikTok and potential overreach in prohibiting applications without clear guidelines regarding what constitutes a 'cybersecurity threat'. Opponents may argue that the approach could limit engagement with constituents through popular platforms, while supporters emphasize the need for stricter controls over state technology usage. As the bill progresses, discussions will likely address the balance between necessary security measures and the importance of maintaining open communication channels in public governance.