Connecticut Senate Bill SJ00070

Connecticut 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/30/23
• Refer: 3/30/23
• Report Pass: 4/28/23
• Engrossed: 5/3/23
• Passed: 5/3/23

Caption

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of Emily H. Wagner, Esquire, Of West Hartford To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

Votes

The votes on SJ00070 highlight the bipartisan support for Wagner's confirmation, with the resolution passing through with 143 votes in favor and none against. This unanimous support suggests a strong consensus on her qualifications and readiness to serve in the role, although the absence of a dissenting vote does not eliminate the possibility of underlying tensions regarding judicial nominations more broadly.

Impact

The resolution, if passed, will enable the official appointment of Wagner, thus filling a judicial vacancy left by her predecessor, the Honorable Kenneth L. Shluger. Appointing qualified judges is a critical function of the legislature, as it directly impacts the administration of justice within the state. Having well-qualified judges like Wagner in the Superior Court potentially enhances the efficiency and fairness of judicial proceedings, influencing various legal outcomes for the state's residents.

Summary

SJ00070 is a resolution proposed in the Connecticut General Assembly to confirm the nomination of Emily H. Wagner, Esquire, of West Hartford, to serve as a judge of the Superior Court. The resolution asserts the approval of her nomination by the Governor, facilitating her tenure for an extended term of eight years once confirmed by both legislative houses. This process is vital as it promotes transparency and accountability regarding judicial appointments, ensuring that qualified individuals occupy positions within the state's judiciary system.

Contention

Discussion around judicial nominations can often be contentious, reflecting differing party values regarding the qualifications necessary for judicial roles and the broader implications of such appointments on the legal landscape. Although the voting outcome indicated broad support for Wagner's confirmation, the potential for partisan disagreements typically accompanies nominations, especially in politically charged environments where judicial philosophy is a central focus.