Connecticut Senate Bill SR00016

Connecticut 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/1/23
• Refer: 2/3/23
• Refer: 2/23/23
• Report Pass: 3/1/23

Caption

Resolution Approving The Stipulated Agreement In Dallas Church, By His Next Friend And Father, Jerry Barrios V. State Of Connecticut.

Impact

The passage of SR00016 will facilitate the resolution of the legal matter at hand, allowing the state to comply with the court's ruling and to allocate the necessary funds from the General Fund to cover the agreement. By formalizing this financial commitment within the state budget, the resolution aims to ensure that the state's obligations arising from legal disputes are met promptly and in accordance with judicial processes.

Summary

SR00016 is a Senate Resolution approving the stipulated agreement in the case of 'Dallas Church, by His Next Friend and Father, Jerry Barrios v. State of Connecticut'. The resolution was presented in the Connecticut General Assembly to authorize an expenditure exceeding two million five hundred thousand dollars from the General Fund. This action stems from a legal settlement approved by the Connecticut Superior Court in January 2023, which required the state to fulfill certain financial obligations as part of the settlement terms.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment toward SR00016 appears to be supportive, as evidenced by the unanimous vote in favor (8 yeas, 0 nays) in the Judiciary Committee. The lack of opposition suggests that the resolution is viewed as a necessary step to rectify the legal situation and fulfill the state's financial responsibilities. Committee discussions likely reflected a collaborative approach, emphasizing the importance of upholding judicial settlements.

Contention

While there is no significant public contention reported regarding SR00016, as it pertains to a settlement agreement, it is essential to recognize that such financial decisions can lead to broader discussions on the allocation of state funds. Some stakeholders may raise concerns about the implications of such expenditures on future budgets, particularly if similar legal settlements arise, but these concerns were not the focus in the available discussions surrounding this specific resolution.