Connecticut 2024 2024 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05005 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 04/26/2024

                    OFFICE OF FISCAL ANALYSIS 
Legislative Office Building, Room 5200 
Hartford, CT 06106  (860) 240-0200 
http://www.cga.ct.gov/ofa 
sHB-5005 
AN ACT EXPANDING PAID SICK DAYS IN THE STATE. 
As Amended by House "B" (LCO 4443) 
House Calendar No.: 232  
 
Primary Analyst: CR 	4/24/24 
Contributing Analyst(s): CW   
Reviewer: CW 
 
 
 
OFA Fiscal Note 
 
State Impact: 
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 25 $ FY 26 $ 
Labor Dept. 	GF - Cost 112,984 203,968 
State Comptroller - Fringe 
Benefits
1
 
GF - Cost 38,768 77,537 
Labor Dept. 	GF - Potential 
Revenue Gain 
Minimal Minimal 
Note: GF=General Fund  
Municipal Impact: None  
Explanation 
The bill, which expands the state's paid sick leave law, results in a 
cost to (1) the Department of Labor (DOL) of $112,984 in FY 25 (partial 
year cost) and $203,968 in FY 26, and (2) the State Comptroller- Fringe 
Benefits account of $38,768 in FY 25 (partial year cost) and $77,537 in FY 
26, as well as a potential minimal revenue gain associated with penalties 
from violations. 
In order to administer the expanded sick leave provisions, DOL 
would require two Wage Enforcement Agents (annualized individual 
cost of $93,984 for salary, $38,768 for fringe benefits, and $8,000 for 
overhead costs). 
                                                
1
The fringe benefit costs for most state employees are budgeted centrally in accounts 
administered by the Comptroller. The estimated active employee fringe benefit cost 
associated with most personnel changes is 41.25% of payroll in FY 25.  2024HB-05005-R010617-FN.docx 	Page 2 of 2 
 
 
Section 8 of the bill prohibits the Office of Policy and Management 
(OPM) from applying holdbacks to personal services expenditures for 
wage enforcement agents within the Department of Labor (DOL) for FY 
25.  To the extent OPM would have applied such holdbacks in FY 25, 
this results in (1) additional Personal Services funds being available to 
DOL for that fiscal year and (2) a commensurate amount of FY 25 
holdbacks being applied against other accounts or agencies. 
House “B” adds provisions that (1) establish a task force to study the 
establishment of paid sick leave tax credits for employers that employ 
five or less individuals in the state, (2) require the Labor Commissioner 
to ensure that necessary wage enforcement duties and responsibilities 
associated with administering paid sick leave are performed within 
available appropriations for FY 25, and (3) prohibit the Office of Policy 
and Management (OPM) from applying holdbacks to personal services 
expenditures for wage enforcement agents within the DOL for FY 25.  
This does not result in any fiscal impact. 
The Out Years 
The ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the 
future subject to inflation, number of violations, and penalties paid.