Connecticut 2024 2024 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05498 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 05/03/2024

                    OFFICE OF FISCAL ANALYSIS 
Legislative Office Building, Room 5200 
Hartford, CT 06106  (860) 240-0200 
http://www.cga.ct.gov/ofa 
sHB-5498 
AN ACT CONCERNING ELECTION SECURITY AND 
TRANSPARENCY, VARIOUS OTHER REVISIONS RELATED TO 
ELECTION ADMINISTRATION AND STATE ELECTIONS 
ENFORCEMENT COMMISSION COMPLAINTS. 
As Amended by House "A" (LCO 5399) 
House Calendar No.: 341  
 
Primary Analyst: TM 	5/3/24 
Contributing Analyst(s):    
Reviewer: PR 
 
 
 
OFA Fiscal Note 
 
State Impact: 
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 25 $ FY 26 $ 
Judicial Dept. (Probation) GF - Potential 
Cost 
Minimal Minimal 
Resources of the General Fund GF - Potential 
Revenue Gain 
Minimal Minimal 
Note: GF=General Fund  
Municipal Impact: 
Municipalities Effect FY 25 $ FY 26 $ 
Various Municipalities Potential 
Cost 
Minimal Minimal 
Various Municipalities Potential 
Savings 
Minimal Minimal 
  
Explanation 
 The bill makes a variety of changes concerning election security and 
administration resulting in the fiscal impacts outlined below. 
Sections 1 and 2, creates a variety of requirements around drop 
boxes, including position and placement, video surveillance, and 
retention of records resulting in a potential municipal cost. The Office of 
the Secretary of the State (SOTS) distributed over 250 drop boxes at the 
beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, to each town in the state. The 
exact cost to municipalities will depend on the additional surveillance  2024HB-05498-R01-FN.DOCX 	Page 2 of 3 
 
 
and the security measures required.  
Section 5 extends existing provisions for designee supported voter 
assistance to patients in nursing homes under certain conditions prior 
to an election, resulting in no fiscal impact to the state.  
Sections 6 and 7 expand existing felonies and create a new class A 
misdemeanor regarding election interference, which results in a 
potential cost to the Department of Correction and the Judicial 
Department for incarceration or probation and a potential revenue gain 
to the General Fund from fines.  On average, the marginal cost to the 
state for incarcerating an offender for the year is $3,300 while the 
average marginal cost for supervision in the community is less than $800 
each year for adults and $1,000 each year for juveniles 
Sections 18-23, conforms current practice regarding removal of 
candidates from printed ballots by expanding the number of ways they 
may do so, resulting in no fiscal impact.  
Section 24, which requires the Chief State's Attorney to report on 
certain complaints, is not anticipated to result in a fiscal impact as the 
Division of Criminal Justice has the expertise to carry out this task. 
Section 26 empowers registrars of voters to appoint themselves as 
moderators in certain conditions for early in-person voting with 
approval of SOTS resulting in potential savings for municipalities. The 
savings would depend on the number of poll workers required to 
facilitate early in person voting, and how many positions may be offset 
by this provision. 
Section 30 requires SOTS to review existing process for how 
languages other than English are translated for appearance on ballots 
where required to do so and create a report, resulting in no fiscal impact.  
Section 31 creates several additional exceptions to information that 
may be disclosed under the Freedom of Information Act and results in 
no fiscal impact.   2024HB-05498-R01-FN.DOCX 	Page 3 of 3 
 
 
House "A" strikes the underlying bill and results in the fiscal impacts 
described above. 
The Out Years 
The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would 
continue into the future subject to inflation.  
 
The preceding Fiscal Impact statement is prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely 
for the purposes of information, summarization and explanation and does not represent the intent of the General 
Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose. In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of 
informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge. Whenever applicable, agency data is 
consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any 
specific department.