Connecticut House Bill HJ00230

Connecticut 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/13/24
• Report Pass: 3/22/24
• Refer: 3/13/24
• Refer: 4/2/24
• Report Pass: 4/9/24

Caption

Resolution Memorializing Congress To Rescind Previous Applications Of The General Assembly Calling For An Article V Convention To Propose Amendments To The Constitution Of The United States.

Impact

The passage of HJ00230 would clarify the state’s current position regarding the constitutional amendment processes through an Article V Convention. By formally rescinding the previous applications, the bill aims to prevent Congress from considering these earlier requests as active, thus halting any potential moves toward a convention focused on those specific issues. This indicates a legislative decision to distance itself from these particular proposals for constitutional amendments, which could have had far-reaching implications for state policies and taxation.

Summary

House Joint Resolution 230 (HJ00230) is a resolution from the General Assembly that memorializes Congress to rescind previous applications for an Article V Convention. These previous applications were made for the purposes of proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution concerning participation in a world federal government and the taxation of state residents by other states. The resolution seeks to nullify the earlier applications, reflecting a shift in the stance of the Connecticut General Assembly on these issues. It specifically mentions the resolutions passed in 1949 and 1958 that previously sought such conventions, signaling a newfound desire to retract them.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HJ00230 appears to be largely supportive within the Assembly, as it reflects a consensus to retract past actions that no longer align with current legislative objectives. The resolution's movement through the necessary legislative processes suggests an acknowledgment of changing perspectives on state and federal relationships, particularly concerning constitutional amendments. However, as with most legislative actions involving constitutional conventions, there may be underlying controversies about the implications of holding such a convention in the future.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise surrounding the amendment processes that HJ00230 seeks to rescind. While the resolution is intended to clarify positions, there are differing opinions on the efficacy and consequences of such amendments if proposed again in the future. Some members may argue that the state should retain the ability to call for constitutional amendments on issues they deem necessary, while others may feel that pursuing such amendments could lead to unintended consequences or complications in state governance.