Connecticut 2024 2024 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00307 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 04/18/2024

                     
Researcher: MF 	Page 1 	4/18/24 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
sSB 307 (File 317, as amended by Senate "A")  
 
AN ACT CONCERNING MEDICAID COVERAGE OF BIOMARKER 
TESTING.  
 
SUMMARY 
This bill requires the Department of Social Services (DSS), to the 
extent federal law allows, to provide coverage for biomarker testing to 
diagnose, treat, manage, or monitor a Medicaid enrollee’s disease or 
condition. The bill requires the DSS commissioner to ensure this 
coverage is medically necessary under existing state law applicable to 
Medicaid services (see BACKGROUND).  
The bill requires the commissioner to analyze relevant information 
and use applicable clinical guidelines to inform her medical necessity 
determination for the testing, including medical and scientific evidence 
that demonstrates that a test provides clinical utility (e.g., FDA approval 
or recommendations or other coverage determinations).  
Under existing law, clinical policies, medical policies, clinical criteria, 
and any other generally accepted clinical practice guidelines that DSS 
uses to evaluate a service’s medical necessity are only used as guidelines 
and are not the basis for DSS’s final determination. The bill specifies that 
its provisions do not change these medical necessity provisions in 
existing law. The bill further specifies that its provisions do not limit 
DSS’s ability to require prior authorization to ensure that requested 
testing meets the standards described above. 
The bill requires the DSS commissioner to ensure that Medicaid 
coverage of biomarker testing is provided in a way that limits 
disruptions in care. The bill allows anyone adversely affected by DSS’s 
decisions on this testing to request a fair hearing from the department 
under a process established in existing law (CGS § 17b-60).  
*Senate Amendment “A” (1) requires DSS to ensure coverage is  2024SB-00307-R01-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MF 	Page 2 	4/18/24 
 
medically necessary under existing law rather than conditioning 
coverage on certain evidence to determine medical necessity, (2) 
requires evidence to demonstrate clinical utility and defines this term, 
and (3) adds provisions on limiting disruptions in care and fair hearings. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2024 
BIOMARKER TESTING 
The bill’s coverage requirements apply to biomarker testing, which is 
the analysis of a patient’s tissue, blood, or other biospecimen for 
biomarkers, which are characteristics, like a gene mutation or protein 
expression, that can be objectively measured and evaluated as an 
indicator of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, or 
pharmacologic responses to a specific therapeutic intervention for a 
disease or condition. The testing includes tests for single or multiple 
substances, diseases or conditions, and whole genome sequencing. 
MEDICAL AND SCIENTI FIC EVIDENCE TO SUPP ORT TEST 
COVERAGE 
Under the bill, DSS must use applicable clinical guidelines to inform 
its medical necessity determination for biomarker testing, including 
medical and scientific evidence that demonstrates that a test provides 
clinical utility. Under the bill, a test result has “clinical utility” if it 
provides information used to make a treatment or monitoring strategy 
that informs a patient’s outcome and impacts the clinical decision, and 
it may include both information that is actionable and information that 
cannot be immediately used to make a clinical decision. 
Under the bill, this medical and scientific evidence may include one 
or more of the following: 
1. FDA approval of the test or FDA drug label recommendations to 
conduct the test; 
2. the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ national 
or local coverage determinations for Medicare Administrative 
Contractors;   2024SB-00307-R01-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MF 	Page 3 	4/18/24 
 
3. nationally recognized clinical practice guidelines, which are (a) 
evidence-based guidelines that set standards of care informed by 
a systemic evidence review and cost-benefit analysis of 
alternative care options and (b) developed by independent 
organizations or medical professional societies; or 
4. consensus statements, which are statements developed by an 
independent, multidisciplinary expert panel, aimed at specific 
clinical circumstances and based on the best available evidence 
to optimize clinical care outcomes. 
Both the clinical practice guidelines and the consensus statements 
described above must be developed using transparent methodologies, 
reporting structures, and conflict of interest policies. 
BACKGROUND 
Related Bill 
sHB 5367 (File 282), favorably reported by the Appropriations and 
Human Services committees, requires DSS to provide medically 
necessary Medicaid coverage for rapid whole genome sequencing for 
critically ill infants. 
Medical Necessity 
By law, for DSS’s medical assistance programs (e.g., Medicaid), 
“medically necessary” means health services required to prevent, 
identify, diagnose, treat, rehabilitate, or ameliorate a person’s medical 
condition, or its effects, to attain or maintain achievable health and 
independent functioning. Medically necessary services must be: 
1. consistent with generally accepted medical practice standards; 
2. clinically appropriate in terms of type, frequency, timing, site, 
extent, and duration and considered effective for the person’s 
illness, injury, or disease; 
3. not primarily for the person’s or the health care provider’s 
convenience;  2024SB-00307-R01-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MF 	Page 4 	4/18/24 
 
4. not more costly than an alternative service that is at least as likely 
to produce equivalent therapeutic or diagnostic results for the 
person’s illness, injury, or disease; and  
5. based on an assessment of the person and their medical condition 
(CGS § 17b-259b). 
COMMITTEE ACTION 
Human Services Committee 
Joint Favorable Substitute 
Yea 22 Nay 0 (03/19/2024)