Connecticut 2024 2024 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00428 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 04/17/2024

                    OFFICE OF FISCAL ANALYSIS 
Legislative Office Building, Room 5200 
Hartford, CT 06106  (860) 240-0200 
http://www.cga.ct.gov/ofa 
sSB-428 
AN ACT CONCERNING BUSINESS REGISTRATIONS FILED WITH 
THE SECRETARY OF THE STATE.  
 
Primary Analyst: TM 	4/16/24 
Contributing Analyst(s): ME, LG, MM, BP   
Reviewer: PR 
 
 
 
OFA Fiscal Note 
 
State Impact: 
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 25 $ FY 26 $ 
Secretary of the State GF - Potential 
Revenue Gain 
Minimal Minimal 
Secretary of the State GF - Cost Approximately 
200,000 
None 
Attorney General 	GF - Potential 
Cost 
Significant Significant 
Judicial Dept. (Probation);  
Correction, Dept. 
GF - Potential 
Cost 
Minimal Minimal 
Resources of the General Fund GF - Potential 
Revenue Gain 
Minimal Minimal 
Note: GF=General Fund 
  
Municipal Impact: 
Municipalities Effect FY 25 $ FY 26 $ 
All Municipalities 	Revenue 
Gain 
Potential Potential 
  
Explanation 
The bill makes various changes in laws that govern certain business 
entities and results in the costs and revenue gains outlined below.  
Sections 17-21, requires companies to file an amendment under 
certain conditions and imposes a $25 fee for doing so, resulting in 
potential revenue to the Secretary of the State (SOTS). The exact revenue 
gain will depend on the number of amended filings created by the bill.   2024SB-00428-R000533-FN.DOCX 	Page 2 of 3 
 
 
Section 36, requires SOTS to develop an electronic system for filing 
and searching for trade name certificates. This has a cost of 
approximately $200,000 to develop and implement. SOTS expects to be 
able to provide the training necessary for municipalities to utilize the 
new system within existing resources.  
Section 39 results in a potential revenue gain to municipalities 
beginning in FY 25 associated with a $20 fee collected by town clerks for 
recording trade name renewals, amendments, and cancellation fees. 
Any revenue gain will depend on the number of filings.    
Sections 41-43 46 and 47, create a requirement for the Office of the 
Attorney General to take certain enforcement actions within a 
designated timeline and results in a potential cost. The cost associated 
depends on the additional staffing and resources required to meet the 
provisions of the bill.   
Section 44 empowers the SOTS to issue interrogatories to LLCs under 
the Connecticut Uniform Limited Liability Company Act or a statutory 
trust operating under the Connecticut Trust Act and any of the trustees 
and results in potential revenue to the Resources of the General Fund. 
The bill requires compliance in response to interrogatories and imposes 
a penalty of $500 for any member, manager, trust, or trustees who fail 
to respond in a manner that is timely, truthful, and complete. The exact 
revenue created and will depend on the number of violations and 
penalties imposed.  
Section 52 expands an existing class D felony for perjury, which 
results in a potential cost to the Department of Correction and the 
Judicial Department for incarceration or probation and a potential 
revenue gain to the General Fund from fines.  On average, the marginal 
cost to the state for incarcerating an offender for the year is $3,300
1
 while 
the average marginal cost for supervision in the community is less than 
                                                
1
  Inmate marginal cost is based on increased consumables (e.g., food, clothing, water, 
sewage, living supplies, etc.)  This does not include a change in staffing costs or utility 
expenses because these would only be realized if a unit or facility opened.  2024SB-00428-R000533-FN.DOCX 	Page 3 of 3 
 
 
$800
2
 each year for adults. 
The Out Years 
The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would 
continue into the future subject to inflation, the number of violations, 
and applications completed.   
                                                
2
 Probation marginal cost is based on services provided by private providers and only 
includes costs that increase with each additional participant.  This does not include a 
cost for additional supervision by a probation officer unless a new offense is 
anticipated to result in enough additional offenders to require additional probation 
officers.