OFFICE OF FISCAL ANALYSIS
Legislative Office Building, Room 5200
Hartford, CT 06106 (860) 240-0200
http://www.cga.ct.gov/ofa
SB-432
AN ACT CONCERNING STATE CONTRACTS WITH NONPROFIT
HUMAN SERVICES PROVIDERS.
AMENDMENT
LCO No.: 5531
File Copy No.: 397
Senate Calendar No.: 259
Primary Analyst: LG 5/3/24
Contributing Analyst(s): LD (FN)
Reviewer: RW
OFA Fiscal Note
See Fiscal Note Details
The amendment moves out the date by one year and reduces the
frequency from annually to every five years for the Office of Policy and
Management (OPM) to conduct a review of the state purchase of service
contracts with nonprofit human service providers and provide a report.
The amendment also reduces the number of contracts that must be
reviewed by the January 1, 2026, deadline. It requires OPM to review
the contracts for at least two agencies each year.
This reduces the cost to OPM in the underlying bill for four new
positions and a one-time vendor cost. It is expected OPM will need still
need two positions and some costs for a vendor in FY 25 and FY 26 to
meet these and other requirements in the underlying bill.
The amendment additionally requires that OPM include personal
service agreements with nonprofit human service providers within this
review which is not anticipated to change the associated fiscal impact.
The amendment strikes section 3 and its underlying fiscal impact. The
amendment requires private provider organizations to receive payment
within 45 days after the receipt of a claim, or receipt of services,
whichever is later. This is not anticipated to result in a fiscal impact to
the state. 2024SB-00432-R00LCO05531-FNA.DOCX Page 2 of 2
The amendment also eliminates section 4 and its associated fiscal
impact. Section 4 required OPM to conduct a review of the CORE-CT
system and update any features identified during the review. This
resulted in a cost of approximately $1 million for the review.
The preceding Fiscal Impact statement is prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely
for the purposes of information, summarization and explanation and does not represent the intent of the General
Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose. In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of
informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge. Whenever applicable, agency data is
consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any
specific department.