Connecticut 2025 2025 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06229 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 04/14/2025

                    OFFICE OF FISCAL ANALYSIS 
Legislative Office Building, Room 5200 
Hartford, CT 06106  (860) 240-0200 
http://www.cga.ct.gov/ofa 
sHB-6229 
AN ACT CONCERNING A REDUCTION OF SINGLE -USE PLASTICS 
AND POLYSTYRENE WASTE.  
 
Primary Analyst: WL 	4/14/25 
Contributing Analyst(s): SB, DD, ME, CF, LG, EMG, JP   
Reviewer: EMG 
 
 
 
OFA Fiscal Note 
 
State Impact: 
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 26 $ FY 27 $ 
Department of Administrative 
Services;  Various State Agencies 
App Fund - Cost None None 
Consumer Protection, Dept. GF - Cost None None 
State Comptroller - Fringe 
Benefits
1
 
GF - Cost None None 
Resources of the General Fund GF - Potential 
Revenue Gain 
None None 
Various State Agencies All Funds - 
Potential Cost 
None See Below 
Note: App Fund=All Appropriated Funds; GF=General Fund; All Funds=All Funds 
Municipal Impact: 
Municipalities Effect FY 26 $ FY 27 $ 
Local and Regional School 
Districts 
STATE 
MANDATE
2
 
- Cost 
None None 
Various Municipalities STATE 
MANDATE 
- Cost 
None See Below 
  
Explanation 
The bill, which establishes a number of requirements and criteria 
                                                
1
The fringe benefit costs for most state employees are budgeted centrally in accounts 
administered by the Comptroller. The estimated active employee fringe benefit cost 
associated with most personnel changes is 40.71% of payroll in FY 26. 
2
 State mandate is defined in Sec. 2-32b(2) of the Connecticut General Statutes, "state 
mandate" means any state initiated constitutional, statutory or executive action that 
requires a local government to establish, expand or modify its activities in such a way 
as to necessitate additional expenditures from local revenues.  2025HB-06229-R000679-FN.docx 	Page 2 of 4 
 
 
with regard to single-use plastics and polysterene waste, results in the 
following fiscal impacts: 
Section 2 requires water fountains in state and municipal buildings 
to be replaced with water filling stations whenever such water fountains 
need to be replaced, or when capital projects are undertaken in those 
buildings. These requirements conform to current practice for certain 
state agencies, local and regional school districts, and municipalities. 
The requirements result in a cost to the extent state agencies, local and 
regional school districts, and municipalities, do not currently conform 
to these requirements beginning in FY 27. The cost of replacing a water 
fountain with a water filling station is between $5,000 and $10,000 per 
unit, which is $1,000 to $2,000 more than replacing the old fountain with 
a similar water fountain.  
Section 3, which establishes a task force to study the reduction of 
single-use plastics in the state, does not result in a fiscal impact to the 
state or municipalities because the task force has the expertise to carry 
out these requirements.   
The Out Years 
State Impact: 
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 28 $ FY 29 $ FY 30 $ 
Department of 
Administrative 
Services;  
Various State 
Agencies 
App Fund - Cost 1.3 million 1.3 million 1.3 million 
Consumer 
Protection, Dept. 
GF - Cost 101,195 101,195 101,195 
State 
Comptroller - 
Fringe Benefits 
GF - Cost 40,179 40,179 40,179 
Resources of the 
General Fund 
GF - Potential 
Revenue Gain 
See Below See Below See Below 
Various State 
Agencies 
All Funds - 
Potential Cost 
See Below See Below See Below 
Note: App Fund=All Appropriated Funds; GF=General Fund; All Funds=All Funds  
Municipal Impact: 
Municipalities Effect FY 28 $ FY 29 $ FY 30$  2025HB-06229-R000679-FN.docx 	Page 3 of 4 
 
 
Local and 
Regional School 
Districts 
STATE 
MANDATE 
- Cost 
Potential 
Significant 
Potential 
Significant 
Potential 
Significant 
Various 
Municipalities 
STATE 
MANDATE 
- Cost 
See Below See Below See Below 
  
Section 1, effective July 1, 2027, bans polystyrene foodware and 
packaging products and single-use plastic straws, stirrers, and sticks by 
various entities including, state and municipal agencies, schools, 
vendors with government contracts.  
The ban requires the state to renegotiate various food contracts to 
meet the new requirements resulting in a cost of $1.3 million per year 
beginning in FY 28. The ban results in a potential cost to local and 
regional school districts starting in FY 28, to the extent school districts 
are not compliant with the requirements of the bill. School districts may 
have to renegotiate various contracts and may require additional 
equipment and staffing for dishwashing, or need to purchase disposable 
items that comply with the bill.  For districts that do not currently 
comply with the bill's requirements, the costs may be significant. The 
ban may also result in a potential cost to municipalities to the extent they 
have to renegotiate contracts to meet these requirements. 
In addition, Section 1 requires the Department of Consumer 
Protection (DCP) and the Department of Energy and Environmental 
Protection (DEEP)
3
 to regulate and enforce the provisions of the bill 
resulting in a cost to the state.  To meet the requirements of the bill DCP 
would need to hire one state program manager for a salary and other 
expenses cost of $101,195 in FY 28 and $98,695 in FY 29 and FY 30, along 
with an annual associated fringe benefit cost of $40,179.  This employee 
is needed to conduct educational outreach, provide guidance and 
resources to help business and institutions transition to sustainable 
alternatives, and enforce the provisions of the bill.  
                                                
3
It is anticipated that DEEP can meet the requirements of the bill with existing 
resources.  2025HB-06229-R000679-FN.docx 	Page 4 of 4 
 
 
The bill includes a $250 penalty for second and subsequent violations 
resulting in a potential revenue gain to the state to the extent this occurs.