Connecticut 2025 2025 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06919 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 03/12/2025

                    OFFICE OF FISCAL ANALYSIS 
Legislative Office Building, Room 5200 
Hartford, CT 06106  (860) 240-0200 
http://www.cga.ct.gov/ofa 
HB-6919 
AN ACT REQUIRING NEWBORN SCREENING FOR DUCHENNE 
MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY.  
 
Primary Analyst: NB 	3/10/25 
Contributing Analyst(s):    
Reviewer: JS 
 
 
 
OFA Fiscal Note 
 
State Impact: 
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 26 $ FY 27 $ FY 28 $ 
Public Health, 
Dept. 
GF - Cost None 337,000 319,000 
State 
Comptroller - 
Fringe Benefits
1
 
GF - Cost None 56,000 56,000 
Public Health, 
Dept. 
GF - Potential 
Revenue Gain 
None See Below See Below 
Note: GF=General Fund 
  
Municipal Impact: None  
Explanation 
The bill adds Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) to the state's 
newborn screening panel.  This will result in a cost to the Department of 
Public Health's (DPH's) existing Newborn Screening Program of 
approximately $337,000 in FY 27 and $319,000 in FY 28 (and annually 
thereafter), and an estimated annual cost to the Office of State 
Comptroller for associated fringe benefits of $56,000 beginning in FY 27. 
It is anticipated that DPH will initiate implementation of the 
programmatic expansion during FY 27, to validate testing methods and 
prepare for universal testing starting July 1, 2027. 
                                                
1
The fringe benefit costs for most state employees are budgeted centrally in accounts 
administered by the Comptroller. The estimated active employee fringe benefit cost 
associated with most personnel changes is 40.71% of payroll in FY 26.  2025HB-06919-R000084-FN.DOCX 	Page 2 of 3 
 
 
The costs to DPH reflect the need for two new positions, with a total 
Personal Services annual cost of $137,000: (1) a Chemist 2 to perform this 
new laboratory screening on each year’s birth cohort, at an annual salary 
of $73,000, and (2) a Health Program Assistant 1 to facilitate the new 
screening process, at an annual salary of $64,000.  Fringe benefits costs 
for these positions are $30,000 and $26,000, respectively.  
Additional costs to DPH are anticipated to total $200,000 in FY 27 and 
$182,000 in FY 28 (and annually thereafter).
2
  The expected FY 27 costs, 
which continue with inflation into the out years (except where noted), 
are: (1) DMD testing kits ($150,000), (2) ancillary laboratory supplies and 
are reagents ($18,000), (3) education materials regarding DMD 
symptoms, diagnosis and treatment to be distributed to every 
gynecologist, obstetrician and pediatrician in the state for provision to 
their pregnant and postpartum patients ($7,000), and (4) a one-time FY 
27 expense for Laboratory Information Management System software 
upgrades ($25,000). 
It is uncertain at this time whether any offsetting revenue will be 
generated due to passage of this bill. DPH is currently authorized to 
collect a fee of at least $98 per child from hospitals submitting samples 
for newborn testing.  The exact fee (currently $113) is set at the discretion 
of the commissioner, subject to the Secretary of the Office of Policy and 
Management's approval.  If the agency elects to increase the fee to cover 
the costs of DMD testing, a corresponding General Fund revenue gain, 
which may be significant in magnitude, would occur. 
The Out Years 
The DMD program is nominated for inclusion on the federal 
Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP), which is a list of 
disorders that the Secretary of Health and Human Services recommends 
for states to screen as part of their Newborn Screening Program. If 
added, future DMD screening costs may be eligible for a federal NBS 
                                                
2
FY 28 other expenses cost reflects an estimated 4% increase in product prices annually, 
resulting in increased costs for DMD testing kits ($6,000) and ancillary supplies and 
reagents ($1,000).  2025HB-06919-R000084-FN.DOCX 	Page 3 of 3 
 
 
Propel grant from the Health Resources and Services Administration. 
If DMD screening is not added to the RUSP, the annualized ongoing 
fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to 
inflation.