Connecticut 2025 2025 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07020 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 03/31/2025

                     
Researcher: CR 	Page 1 	3/31/25 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
HB 7020  
 
AN ACT CONCERNING CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS.  
 
SUMMARY 
This bill makes a number of changes to requirements for certified 
public accountants (CPAs). It adds two new ways to satisfy the 
educational requirements and alters the experience required to obtain a 
CPA certificate. The bill also alters the requirements for granting a 
practice privilege to a person with a principal place of business outside 
the state, which permits the person to act as a CPA in the state without 
obtaining a Connecticut CPA certificate. 
Finally, the bill makes technical and conforming changes. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2025 
CPA REQUIREMENTS 
 By law, the State Board of Accountancy can issue a certificate of CPA 
to someone who meets good character, education, experience, and 
examination requirements.  
Education 
Currently, to satisfy the education requirement, a person must (1) 
complete at least 150 semester hours of college education including a 
bachelor’s degree or higher from a college or university acceptable to 
the board and (2) have an accounting or equivalent concentration, as 
determined by the board in a regulation. 
The bill adds two alternate ways to satisfy the education 
requirements: 
1. 120 semester hours of education, a bachelor’s degree or 
equivalent from a college or university acceptable to the board, 
and an accounting concentration or equivalent, as determined by  2025HB-07020-R000361-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: CR 	Page 2 	3/31/25 
 
the board in a regulation; or 
2. 120 semester hours of education, a master’s degree or equivalent 
from a college or university acceptable to the board, and an 
accounting concentration or equivalent, as determined by the 
board in a regulation. 
The bill limits the board’s authority to adopt regulations on education 
requirements to implementing the bill’s requirements, rather than 
allowing the regulations to specify these requirements. 
Experience 
Current law allows the board to adopt regulations to set the 
experience requirements for CPAs and the board’s regulations require 
two years of experience. The bill retains the two-year requirement for 
those who satisfy the education requirements by having 120 semester 
hours of education and a bachelor’s degree with an accounting or 
equivalent concentration but reduces it to one year for someone who 
meets the education requirements using either of the other two options 
described above. 
The bill limits the board’s authority to adopt regulations on 
experience requirements to implementing the bill’s requirements, rather 
than allowing the regulations to specify these requirements. 
PRACTICE PRIVILEGES 
The bill changes how a person with a principal place of business 
outside the state qualifies for a practice privilege in Connecticut that 
permits the person to act as a CPA without obtaining a Connecticut 
license. 
Currently, a person qualifies for practice privileges (with certain 
exceptions for those licensed prior to January 1, 2012) if he or she holds 
a CPA license from another state and the National Association of State 
Boards of Accountancy (NASBA) verifies that: 
1. the other state’s licensure requirements are substantially 
equivalent to those in the Uniform Accountancy Act (an act  2025HB-07020-R000361-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: CR 	Page 3 	3/31/25 
 
developed by NASBA and the American Institute of Certified 
Public Accountants) or  
2. the person’s qualifications are substantially equivalent to those 
in the act. 
The bill eliminates these provisions and instead qualifies a person for 
practice privileges if he or she holds a CPA license from another state 
and meets the good character, education, experience, and examination 
requirements applicable to Connecticut licensees. It allows the board to 
decline to provide a person with some or all of the practice privileges if 
the other state’s good character, education, experience, or examination 
requirements are (1) less stringent than Connecticut’s and (2) 
insufficient to protect Connecticut consumers. 
COMMITTEE ACTION 
General Law Committee 
Joint Favorable 
Yea 22 Nay 0 (03/12/2025)